Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Which Doogism irks your ire the most?

2

Comments

  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,426 Standard Supporter
    The Grinolds Groaner: state matter-of-factly that instate recruiting is fine despite face-slapping evidence to the contrary

    Fetters is a troll. He just likes to argue. Kim plugging his ears and closing his eyes is the worst. He acts like there are no problems.

    Hey Kim how is our OL holding up?

    I also remember Kim and other Doogs saying "UW will win 10 games this year if Keith Price has a good year."

    Well he hasn't thrown a pick since the Oregon game yet UW is 2-2 in the last four games. This year proved us all right and Kim wrong that Price isn't the problem.

    He has a 19-4 TD-INT ratio yet the team is headed towards yet another underachieving season.
    I had forgotten all about Kim and others saying this was a 10 win team if Price had a good season until Chest mentioned it on the podcast. Price has had a very good season, and we are still a 7-6 team. It doesn't matter who plays QB. Sark's always gonna Sark.
  • The Fleenor Fallacy: minimize the great Don James' accomplishments in an attempt to prop up Sarkisian
    This is a really good poll. First poll on here I've actually struggled with making a choice.

    I wonder if these Doogs know deep down inside after they press "submit" on their comment that they know they are full of shit.

    No way these fucks can actually believe the crap they are writing.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    HFNY said:

    I agree with CollegeDoog (had to pick one so picked JohnB for his sneering contempt for anyone who challenges the conventional "wisdom").

    Still, it's like picking the ugliest girl in a room full of ugly chicks...a race to the bottom:

    image

    Brb. JO
  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,790 Founders Club
    The Grinolds Groaner: state matter-of-factly that instate recruiting is fine despite face-slapping evidence to the contrary

    This is a really good poll. First poll on here I've actually struggled with making a choice.

    I wonder if these Doogs know deep down inside after they press "submit" on their comment that they know they are full of shit.

    No way these fucks can actually believe the crap they are writing.

    It was hard to choose because The Field wasn't an option.
  • Dardanus
    Dardanus Member Posts: 2,623
    edited November 2013
    The Eklund Emasculation: throw the players under the bus at every opportunity and never hold the multimillionaire coach responsible
    The The Eklund Emasculation bugs me because they are acknowledging that there IS a problem, but then push the blame around to everyone except the coach.

    Why are they so protective of the guy who gets paid tons of money to do a job, but are quick to blame players, officials, or even assistants (who are under the direction of the head coach)?
  • MelloDawg
    MelloDawg Member Posts: 6,917
    The MykFS Malaise: ignore glaring W-L statistics and cite obscure, irrelevant data to justify continued mediocrity
    I've been getting Myk's argument a lot regarding scoring more PPG against ranked opponents and other such metrics, while ignoring the win-loss record.
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,815 Swaye's Wigwam
    The Grinolds Groaner: state matter-of-factly that instate recruiting is fine despite face-slapping evidence to the contrary
    All aspects of teen boy stalking discussion by SE, Fetters and especially Grinolds. Fetters and Ecklund constantly and unashamedly contradicting themselves on the topic is hard to stomach, but Grinolds takes the cake every time he opens his mouth. He says the same thing every time, which basically amounts to "shut the fuck up and stop thinking for yourselves. I'm telling you that everything is fine."
  • Gladstone
    Gladstone Member Posts: 16,425
    The Fleenor Fallacy: minimize the great Don James' accomplishments in an attempt to prop up Sarkisian
    MelloDawg said:

    I've been getting Myk's argument a lot regarding scoring more PPG against ranked opponents and other such metrics, while ignoring the win-loss record.

    Yep. Madness.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    The Section14A Slapper: extreme passive-aggressiveness. Has superiority complex despite having every reason to have inferiority complex
    HFNY said:

    I agree with CollegeDoog (had to pick one so picked JohnB for his sneering contempt for anyone who challenges the conventional "wisdom").

    Still, it's like picking the ugliest girl in a room full of ugly chicks...a race to the bottom:

    image

    You just summed up Pool Boy's interview and hiring process perfectly.
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 69,862 Founders Club
    The Eklund Emasculation: throw the players under the bus at every opportunity and never hold the multimillionaire coach responsible
    Tequilla said:

    Recruiting ...

    Simply b/c all you have to do is look at how far behind our OL/DL play is compared to the rest of the team and that's driven by the quality of recruiting in these areas wasn't good enough in the first 2-3 years of Sark's tenure and he's paying for it now


    Amen and hallelujah