Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
The harshest condemnation of Browning...
...is that this was actually one of the very best games he’s played at Washington. He was less indecisive (until the final series). He converted many tough third downs in a very hostile environment. His deep balls were brisk and on target. He even ran effectively when he had to.
For me, his performance against Auburn ranks up there with his Stanford ‘16 and his Oregon ‘16. This is what peak Browning looks like. And it’s not good enough to win a playoff-type game.
35 ·
Comments
Once the clock got low and it was do or die, locked back up.
Are there really any teams we can’t beat with either Haener or the freshmen? Get them some experience. We’ve seen The current QB’s ceiling. Let’s find out the ceilings of the other ones.
It’s like he visualizes the possible mistake before the possible success on these critical plays. By the time he processes, it is to late. I know the QB needs to be mindful but he also needs to trust and let it go.
You guys have definitely succeeded in lowering the bar for browning here, that's for sure.
Fuck off. This is real life. Make the playoff every year.
Bitching at Browning because Browning has limitations that he can’t change is FS in my mind at this point
I would say he did a good job managing the game but the 2 turnovers were inexcusable
The bar is set so fucking low it’s like “he converted a couple third downs!! He’s not so bad!!!”
I’ve said it all offseason, Jake is the 2007 of QBs. As long as he doesn’t go 0-12 people will defend him.
Name one fucking play where Jake made a throw like the one Stidham made to the Italian Stallion over Miller. Name one.
Oh, you can’t.
Stidham is a good (not great) quality CFB QB.
Stidham is basically the average of what we should expect. Jake isn’t even close.