The fucktard discussion is not just on ****man.com

Houhusky

http://www.reddit.com/r/huskies/comments/1qx193/sarkfacts/

check out the reused doog arguments over on reddit, We also get some FREE PUB from doog favorite supercanuck

HFNY

I see the Duchess of Doogs, "supercanuck" made his way onto the Reddit conversation. Man, SSWS must have pictures of supercanuck doing snuff porn or something...his devotion to his dear leader just doesn't make any sense.

MadHusky

The season is not over. If we win the rest of the games and win the bowl game. People will be quiet about it.
Sark has been a tremendous recruiter. Sure, his play-calling and game management are suspect at times but unless people have better candidates then there's no point of talking about it.

dhdawg

spoooooooooooky said:

I don't think that even winning the rest of our games (and going 5-4 again) will be enough to satisfy most fans.
Yeah, Sark's recruiting on both lines has really been impressive... (/sarcasm)

kingwhipsy said:

Are you a Ducks fan?

LOL

jecornel

majority of doog nation wanted Cyler as the starter in August.

[Deleted User]

monroecougdad said:

Christ...

But record is such a terrible way of judging how good a team is. Let's say a week ago I said that Keith Price would have been out for half of the UCLA game, and I asked the people in this thread to set a spread on the game. Even as homers I don't think we would see an average spread of less than 5 or 6.
So Washington performed 4-5 points worse than expected. Why does that cause such an uproar? Washington performed as expected, or at least reasonably close to it. Having people make passive-aggressive posts like this is only showing how emotional people are getting about this which IMO is not a good way to make coaching decisions.

Fag

Sounds like that moron Myk who refuses to aknowledge W-L and always tries to bring up obscure stats to show that Sark is better than his average record indicates.

doogsinparadise

"You know, I tried writing a constructive and well written comment to defend Sark but I'm done wasting my breath. If the Sark haters want him gone so bad, then so be it. I don't think people on that train realize what firing a coach does to a team. Whatever happens, happens. Good luck to this sub, I'm out. Seriously depressing." -- thatonekidunusual

This has to be a whoosh, If you're going to bash losing, than I'm out style

doogsinparadise

HFNY said:

I see the Duchess of Doogs, "supercanuck" made his way onto the Reddit conversation. Man, SSWS must have pictures of supercanuck doing snuff porn or something...his devotion to his dear leader just doesn't make any sense.

"Some of us feel like Sarkisian over achieved in '09 and '10 and is under-achieving in '12 and '13." -supercanuck

MelloDawg

He_Needs_More_Time said:

monroecougdad said:

Christ...

But record is such a terrible way of judging how good a team is. Let's say a week ago I said that Keith Price would have been out for half of the UCLA game, and I asked the people in this thread to set a spread on the game. Even as homers I don't think we would see an average spread of less than 5 or 6.
So Washington performed 4-5 points worse than expected. Why does that cause such an uproar? Washington performed as expected, or at least reasonably close to it. Having people make passive-aggressive posts like this is only showing how emotional people are getting about this which IMO is not a good way to make coaching decisions.

Fag

Sounds like that moron Myk who refuses to aknowledge W-L and always tries to bring up obscure stats to show that Sark is better than his average record indicates.

If you would like obscure facts, we now are using PPG against ranked opponents to find a silver lining around the shitcloud of a season we're having, Softy's minon RBC says so. I hear we're doing well with that advanced metric.

[Deleted User]

MelloDawg said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

monroecougdad said:

Christ...

But record is such a terrible way of judging how good a team is. Let's say a week ago I said that Keith Price would have been out for half of the UCLA game, and I asked the people in this thread to set a spread on the game. Even as homers I don't think we would see an average spread of less than 5 or 6.
So Washington performed 4-5 points worse than expected. Why does that cause such an uproar? Washington performed as expected, or at least reasonably close to it. Having people make passive-aggressive posts like this is only showing how emotional people are getting about this which IMO is not a good way to make coaching decisions.

Fag

Sounds like that moron Myk who refuses to aknowledge W-L and always tries to bring up obscure stats to show that Sark is better than his average record indicates.

If you would like obscure facts, we now are using PPG against ranked opponents to find a silver lining around the shitcloud of a season we're having, Softy's minon RBC says so. I hear we're doing well with that advanced metric.

At least the Doogman Doogs are idiots but the Softy Doogs are the white trash element of our fan base that I really hate.

End of the day we are 0-4 against current ranked opponents. I'm sure RBC is excluding ASU and including Boise bc Doogs love to skew facts.

Also I don't want to hear about point differential as Sark benefited from luck the previous three seasons where his expected W-L was worse than his actual W-L meaning he got lucky.

TierbsHsotBoobs

supercanuck said:

Makes perfect sense if you're capable of interpreting FEI, F/+ or SRS.

I'll leave you to it ladies. ;-)

I heard this is the place to get my racism and porn fix.. amirite?

So you agree with us that Sark should have been fired in 2011.

Welcome to the board and LEAVE!