Two things no one is talking about re: Allburn

dnc

1. Auburn only returns 13 starters from last year's team.

2. That team lost 4 games last year.

Win this damn game Pete.

The_Midnight_Tiger

Lol remind me who the 4 teams are again I forgot! also, what were they rated and which ones went to the playoffs

PurpleBaze

The_Midnight_Tiger said:

Lol remind me who the 4 teams are again I forgot! also, what were they rated and which ones went to the playoffs

LEAVE!!

dnc

The_Midnight_Tiger said:

Lol remind me who the 4 teams are again I forgot! also, what were they rated and which ones went to the playoffs

You lost to Ed Orgeron.

hth

RaceBannon

UW's losses the last two seasons

USC
Bama
ASU
Stanford
Penn State

Oh wait they still count as losses

UW falls in the category of teams that beat Auburn

Auburn falls in the category of teams that beat UW

CuntWaffle

The_Midnight_Tiger said:

Lol remind me who the 4 teams are again I forgot! also, what were they rated and which ones went to the playoffs

What are you a fucking 16 year old girl?

GrandpaSankey

The_Midnight_Tiger said:

Lol remind me who the 4 teams are again I forgot! also, what were they rated and which ones went to the playoffs

RaceBannon

CuntWaffle said:

The_Midnight_Tiger said:

Lol remind me who the 4 teams are again I forgot! also, what were they rated and which ones went to the playoffs

What are you a fucking 16 year old girl?</p>

Pics?

AU2xguy

1) Who cares how many starters return? For example, some of those lost starters are on the D-line. AU rotates 8-9 there without a drop off. The starting RT was an all-conference player at another school last year. Returning starters is highly over-rated without context.

2) Half of the losses were to teams in the CFP. And that team still beat two of the four CFP participants in the regular season and was #2 in the country heading into conference championship weekend. Not like they were total dog crap. Remind me again, how many CFP teams played last season? And if we're talking 2017 losses, I present to you Arizona State.

With that, UW probably wins because we'll pull a classic Auburn move and get totally dominated on a big stage.

dnc

AU2xguy said:

1) Who cares how many starters return? For example, some of those lost starters are on the D-line. AU rotates 8-9 there without a drop off. The starting RT was an all-conference player at another school last year. Returning starters is highly over-rated without context.

2) Half of the losses were to teams in the CFP. And that team still beat two of the four CFP participants in the regular season and was #2 in the country heading into conference championship weekend. Not like they were total dog crap. Remind me again, how many CFP teams played last season? And if we're talking 2017 losses, I present to you Arizona State.

With that, UW probably wins because we'll pull a classic Auburn move and get totally dominated on a big stage.

The Arizona State loss is well documented here. It gets talked about plenty.

I'm just saying everyone talks about Auburn in hushed tones and I bet most people here don't realize they dropped four games last year. Everyone in the world knows they beat Bama and Georgia. Few people know they dropped 4.

And I agree context matters on returning starters but all that being said I'd rather have our returning starter situation than yours.

You guys have a big advantage at QB, a strong advantage at WR, a small one at DL and a pretty big one in location of the game. We have the advantage everywhere else, including the sidelines.

Should be a good one.

AU2xguy

dnc said:

AU2xguy said:

1) Who cares how many starters return? For example, some of those lost starters are on the D-line. AU rotates 8-9 there without a drop off. The starting RT was an all-conference player at another school last year. Returning starters is highly over-rated without context.

2) Half of the losses were to teams in the CFP. And that team still beat two of the four CFP participants in the regular season and was #2 in the country heading into conference championship weekend. Not like they were total dog crap. Remind me again, how many CFP teams played last season? And if we're talking 2017 losses, I present to you Arizona State.

With that, UW probably wins because we'll pull a classic Auburn move and get totally dominated on a big stage.

You guys have a big advantage at QB, a strong advantage at WR, a small one at DL and a pretty big one in location of the game. We have the advantage everywhere else, including the sidelines.

Should be a good one.

I disagree with you here on some our "advantages". The UW secondary will likely shut down our WRs for the most part. For AU to win, it will have be done primarily on the ground. The reverse is true for UW. I highly doubt they will be able to run on AU, but if Browning gets time, the secondary can be gotten.

In all seriousness, if anyone here is looking to drink prior to the game, let me know. I'll be at a bar in downtown ATL with friends that opens at 9 a.m. Would love to shoot the shit and throw a few back with folks.

dnc

AU2xguy said:

dnc said:

AU2xguy said:

1) Who cares how many starters return? For example, some of those lost starters are on the D-line. AU rotates 8-9 there without a drop off. The starting RT was an all-conference player at another school last year. Returning starters is highly over-rated without context.

2) Half of the losses were to teams in the CFP. And that team still beat two of the four CFP participants in the regular season and was #2 in the country heading into conference championship weekend. Not like they were total dog crap. Remind me again, how many CFP teams played last season? And if we're talking 2017 losses, I present to you Arizona State.

With that, UW probably wins because we'll pull a classic Auburn move and get totally dominated on a big stage.

You guys have a big advantage at QB, a strong advantage at WR, a small one at DL and a pretty big one in location of the game. We have the advantage everywhere else, including the sidelines.

Should be a good one.

I disagree with you here on some our "advantages". The UW secondary will likely shut down our WRs for the most part. For AU to win, it will have be done primarily on the ground. The reverse is true for UW. I highly doubt they will be able to run on AU, but if Browning gets time, the secondary can be gotten.

In all seriousness, if anyone here is looking to drink prior to the game, let me know. I'll be at a bar in downtown ATL with friends that opens at 9 a.m. Would love to shoot the shit and throw a few back with folks.

Just to clarify, I meant your WRs are better than ours, not that they're better than our secondary. If you want to get into specific matchups like that I think your take is good but we might surprise you on the ground. None of us trust Browning to beat you so if that's what has to happen we're probably screwed.

Southerndawg

dnc said:

AU2xguy said:

dnc said:

AU2xguy said:

1) Who cares how many starters return? For example, some of those lost starters are on the D-line. AU rotates 8-9 there without a drop off. The starting RT was an all-conference player at another school last year. Returning starters is highly over-rated without context.

2) Half of the losses were to teams in the CFP. And that team still beat two of the four CFP participants in the regular season and was #2 in the country heading into conference championship weekend. Not like they were total dog crap. Remind me again, how many CFP teams played last season? And if we're talking 2017 losses, I present to you Arizona State.

With that, UW probably wins because we'll pull a classic Auburn move and get totally dominated on a big stage.

You guys have a big advantage at QB, a strong advantage at WR, a small one at DL and a pretty big one in location of the game. We have the advantage everywhere else, including the sidelines.

Should be a good one.

I disagree with you here on some our "advantages". The UW secondary will likely shut down our WRs for the most part. For AU to win, it will have be done primarily on the ground. The reverse is true for UW. I highly doubt they will be able to run on AU, but if Browning gets time, the secondary can be gotten.

In all seriousness, if anyone here is looking to drink prior to the game, let me know. I'll be at a bar in downtown ATL with friends that opens at 9 a.m. Would love to shoot the shit and throw a few back with folks.

Just to clarify, I meant your WRs are better than ours, not that they're better than our secondary. If you want to get into specific matchups like that I think your take is good but we might surprise you on the ground. None of us trust Browning to beat you so if that's what has to happen we're probably screwed.

I think Auburn's DL is outstanding. Running against them won't be easy. Brownshorts is going to have to get the ball to Gaskin and Ahmed in space while he's under pressure to loosen things up or we're screwed. So, we're screwed.

AU2xguy

Southerndawg said:

dnc said:

AU2xguy said:

dnc said:

AU2xguy said:

1) Who cares how many starters return? For example, some of those lost starters are on the D-line. AU rotates 8-9 there without a drop off. The starting RT was an all-conference player at another school last year. Returning starters is highly over-rated without context.

2) Half of the losses were to teams in the CFP. And that team still beat two of the four CFP participants in the regular season and was #2 in the country heading into conference championship weekend. Not like they were total dog crap. Remind me again, how many CFP teams played last season? And if we're talking 2017 losses, I present to you Arizona State.

With that, UW probably wins because we'll pull a classic Auburn move and get totally dominated on a big stage.

You guys have a big advantage at QB, a strong advantage at WR, a small one at DL and a pretty big one in location of the game. We have the advantage everywhere else, including the sidelines.

Should be a good one.

I disagree with you here on some our "advantages". The UW secondary will likely shut down our WRs for the most part. For AU to win, it will have be done primarily on the ground. The reverse is true for UW. I highly doubt they will be able to run on AU, but if Browning gets time, the secondary can be gotten.

In all seriousness, if anyone here is looking to drink prior to the game, let me know. I'll be at a bar in downtown ATL with friends that opens at 9 a.m. Would love to shoot the shit and throw a few back with folks.

Just to clarify, I meant your WRs are better than ours, not that they're better than our secondary. If you want to get into specific matchups like that I think your take is good but we might surprise you on the ground. None of us trust Browning to beat you so if that's what has to happen we're probably screwed.

I think Auburn's DL is outstanding. Running against them won't be easy. Brownshorts is going to have to get the ball to Gaskin and Ahmed in space while he's under pressure to loosen things up or we're screwed. So, we're screwed.

Quick passes out of the backfield could be the death of us if Browning goes that route.

PurpleBaze

AU2xguy said:

Southerndawg said:

dnc said:

AU2xguy said:

dnc said:

AU2xguy said:

1) Who cares how many starters return? For example, some of those lost starters are on the D-line. AU rotates 8-9 there without a drop off. The starting RT was an all-conference player at another school last year. Returning starters is highly over-rated without context.

2) Half of the losses were to teams in the CFP. And that team still beat two of the four CFP participants in the regular season and was #2 in the country heading into conference championship weekend. Not like they were total dog crap. Remind me again, how many CFP teams played last season? And if we're talking 2017 losses, I present to you Arizona State.

With that, UW probably wins because we'll pull a classic Auburn move and get totally dominated on a big stage.

You guys have a big advantage at QB, a strong advantage at WR, a small one at DL and a pretty big one in location of the game. We have the advantage everywhere else, including the sidelines.

Should be a good one.

I disagree with you here on some our "advantages". The UW secondary will likely shut down our WRs for the most part. For AU to win, it will have be done primarily on the ground. The reverse is true for UW. I highly doubt they will be able to run on AU, but if Browning gets time, the secondary can be gotten.

In all seriousness, if anyone here is looking to drink prior to the game, let me know. I'll be at a bar in downtown ATL with friends that opens at 9 a.m. Would love to shoot the shit and throw a few back with folks.

Just to clarify, I meant your WRs are better than ours, not that they're better than our secondary. If you want to get into specific matchups like that I think your take is good but we might surprise you on the ground. None of us trust Browning to beat you so if that's what has to happen we're probably screwed.

I think Auburn's DL is outstanding. Running against them won't be easy. Brownshorts is going to have to get the ball to Gaskin and Ahmed in space while he's under pressure to loosen things up or we're screwed. So, we're screwed.

Quick passes out of the backfield could be the death of us if Browning goes that route.

EsophagealFeces

AU2xguy said:

dnc said:

AU2xguy said:

1) Who cares how many starters return? For example, some of those lost starters are on the D-line. AU rotates 8-9 there without a drop off. The starting RT was an all-conference player at another school last year. Returning starters is highly over-rated without context.

2) Half of the losses were to teams in the CFP. And that team still beat two of the four CFP participants in the regular season and was #2 in the country heading into conference championship weekend. Not like they were total dog crap. Remind me again, how many CFP teams played last season? And if we're talking 2017 losses, I present to you Arizona State.

With that, UW probably wins because we'll pull a classic Auburn move and get totally dominated on a big stage.

You guys have a big advantage at QB, a strong advantage at WR, a small one at DL and a pretty big one in location of the game. We have the advantage everywhere else, including the sidelines.

Should be a good one.

I disagree with you here on some our "advantages". The UW secondary will likely shut down our WRs for the most part. For AU to win, it will have be done primarily on the ground. The reverse is true for UW. I highly doubt they will be able to run on AU, but if Browning gets time, the secondary can be gotten.

In all seriousness, if anyone here is looking to drink prior to the game, let me know. I'll be at a bar in downtown ATL with friends that opens at 9 a.m. Would love to shoot the shit and throw a few back with folks.

Classy poast.

Alexis

EsophagealFeces said:

AU2xguy said:

dnc said:

AU2xguy said:

1) Who cares how many starters return? For example, some of those lost starters are on the D-line. AU rotates 8-9 there without a drop off. The starting RT was an all-conference player at another school last year. Returning starters is highly over-rated without context.

2) Half of the losses were to teams in the CFP. And that team still beat two of the four CFP participants in the regular season and was #2 in the country heading into conference championship weekend. Not like they were total dog crap. Remind me again, how many CFP teams played last season? And if we're talking 2017 losses, I present to you Arizona State.

With that, UW probably wins because we'll pull a classic Auburn move and get totally dominated on a big stage.

You guys have a big advantage at QB, a strong advantage at WR, a small one at DL and a pretty big one in location of the game. We have the advantage everywhere else, including the sidelines.

Should be a good one.

I disagree with you here on some our "advantages". The UW secondary will likely shut down our WRs for the most part. For AU to win, it will have be done primarily on the ground. The reverse is true for UW. I highly doubt they will be able to run on AU, but if Browning gets time, the secondary can be gotten.

In all seriousness, if anyone here is looking to drink prior to the game, let me know. I'll be at a bar in downtown ATL with friends that opens at 9 a.m. Would love to shoot the shit and throw a few back with folks.

Classy poast.

I heard Auburn fans give standing ovations after losses.

AU2xguy

Alexis said:

EsophagealFeces said:

AU2xguy said:

dnc said:

AU2xguy said:

1) Who cares how many starters return? For example, some of those lost starters are on the D-line. AU rotates 8-9 there without a drop off. The starting RT was an all-conference player at another school last year. Returning starters is highly over-rated without context.

2) Half of the losses were to teams in the CFP. And that team still beat two of the four CFP participants in the regular season and was #2 in the country heading into conference championship weekend. Not like they were total dog crap. Remind me again, how many CFP teams played last season? And if we're talking 2017 losses, I present to you Arizona State.

With that, UW probably wins because we'll pull a classic Auburn move and get totally dominated on a big stage.

You guys have a big advantage at QB, a strong advantage at WR, a small one at DL and a pretty big one in location of the game. We have the advantage everywhere else, including the sidelines.

Should be a good one.

I disagree with you here on some our "advantages". The UW secondary will likely shut down our WRs for the most part. For AU to win, it will have be done primarily on the ground. The reverse is true for UW. I highly doubt they will be able to run on AU, but if Browning gets time, the secondary can be gotten.

In all seriousness, if anyone here is looking to drink prior to the game, let me know. I'll be at a bar in downtown ATL with friends that opens at 9 a.m. Would love to shoot the shit and throw a few back with folks.

Classy poast.

I heard Auburn fans give standing ovations after losses.

Know this is a joke, but I've seen it happen. 2009 loss vs Bama. We had no business making that game as competitive as it was.

dnc

AU2xguy said:

Alexis said:

EsophagealFeces said:

AU2xguy said:

dnc said:

AU2xguy said:

1) Who cares how many starters return? For example, some of those lost starters are on the D-line. AU rotates 8-9 there without a drop off. The starting RT was an all-conference player at another school last year. Returning starters is highly over-rated without context.

2) Half of the losses were to teams in the CFP. And that team still beat two of the four CFP participants in the regular season and was #2 in the country heading into conference championship weekend. Not like they were total dog crap. Remind me again, how many CFP teams played last season? And if we're talking 2017 losses, I present to you Arizona State.

With that, UW probably wins because we'll pull a classic Auburn move and get totally dominated on a big stage.

You guys have a big advantage at QB, a strong advantage at WR, a small one at DL and a pretty big one in location of the game. We have the advantage everywhere else, including the sidelines.

Should be a good one.

I disagree with you here on some our "advantages". The UW secondary will likely shut down our WRs for the most part. For AU to win, it will have be done primarily on the ground. The reverse is true for UW. I highly doubt they will be able to run on AU, but if Browning gets time, the secondary can be gotten.

In all seriousness, if anyone here is looking to drink prior to the game, let me know. I'll be at a bar in downtown ATL with friends that opens at 9 a.m. Would love to shoot the shit and throw a few back with folks.

Classy poast.

I heard Auburn fans give standing ovations after losses.

Know this is a joke, but I've seen it happen. 2009 loss vs Bama. We had no business making that game as competitive as it was.

Nebraska classy

RaceBannon

For the Auburn fan

Husky lore is a game at Nebraska in 1991 where after a crisp 36 to 21 come from behind win over the Huskers the Husker fans rose as one to give the DAWGS a standing O. That's where Nebraska classy comes from

Our fans gave the DAWGS a standing O for losing to LSU after Owen 12 but looking like a football team again.

Gilbystaint

AU2xguy said:

dnc said:

AU2xguy said:

1) Who cares how many starters return? For example, some of those lost starters are on the D-line. AU rotates 8-9 there without a drop off. The starting RT was an all-conference player at another school last year. Returning starters is highly over-rated without context.

2) Half of the losses were to teams in the CFP. And that team still beat two of the four CFP participants in the regular season and was #2 in the country heading into conference championship weekend. Not like they were total dog crap. Remind me again, how many CFP teams played last season? And if we're talking 2017 losses, I present to you Arizona State.

With that, UW probably wins because we'll pull a classic Auburn move and get totally dominated on a big stage.

You guys have a big advantage at QB, a strong advantage at WR, a small one at DL and a pretty big one in location of the game. We have the advantage everywhere else, including the sidelines.

Should be a good one.

I disagree with you here on some our "advantages". The UW secondary will likely shut down our WRs for the most part. For AU to win, it will have be done primarily on the ground. The reverse is true for UW. I highly doubt they will be able to run on AU, but if Browning gets time, the secondary can be gotten.

In all seriousness, if anyone here is looking to drink prior to the game, let me know. I'll be at a bar in downtown ATL with friends that opens at 9 a.m. Would love to shoot the shit and throw a few back with folks.

Gotta love southern hospitality.