Dear Athletic Department, another reason to let Sark go (SHORT)

TierbsHsotBoobs

If you folks can't find a coach better than Sark, you should all be let go instead.

MisterEm

8-18 versus ranked teams.
1-12 on the road versus .500 teams
22-21 in conference.

The cake is burnt.

Next.

Haid_D_Salaami

MisterEm said:

8-18 versus ranked teams.
1-12 on the road versus .500 teams
22-21 in conference.

The cake is burnt.

Next.

Consider this shit.... If it wasn't for the addition of CU to the conference, Sark would have had to play UCLA on the road last year and USC (resurgent after the shitcanning of Sark's twin) this year.

He would likely have a losing conference record....in fucking YEAR 6!

CokeGreaterThanPepsi

I only voted you down because you said what I said in much less words. Fucker

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

If you folks can't find a coach better than Sark, you should all be let go instead.

TierbsHsotBoobs

CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

I only voted you down because you said what I said in much less words. Fucker

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

If you folks can't find a coach better than Sark, you should all be let go instead.

You made the case for firing Sark. I made the case for firing Woodward if he keeps Sark.

Abundance.

HeretoBeatmyChest

MisterEm said:

8-18 versus ranked teams.
1-12 on the road versus .500 teams
22-21 in conference.

The cake is burnt.

Next.

What are those #'s excluding 2009 & 2010. Remember in 2009 he beat USC, Cal, Arizona may have been ranked. 2010 he beat Nebraska and USC. It must be a lot worse in year 3,4, & 5.