I don't know shit about this dude but I really like this answer
Comments
-
I've been busy with family matters. Too late to the party on this one.creepycoug said:
In the 1960s? Yes. Today? No, those are most decidedly you guys.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Yeah, about that... I'm not the one agitating for revolution, those are your guys.ThomasFremont said:
Where were all the gun toting freedom lovers when privacy rights went *poof*??? Just admit that your little armed revolution fantasy is bullshit. Go play Call of Duty, boy.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Yeah, I'm aware of your side's fetish with these little 'fun facts.' I've been reading your shit philosophy on the DSA website, your side is using the same tactics to attack the 2nd amendment by trying to make the argument that the amendments don't apply to the states. I don't know if there's a legal way to attack this argument, I never claimed to be a constitutional lawyer. Here's what you should keep in mind though.Squirt said:
Um, yes, that's my opinion too, although you seem to have comprehended differently.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Prohibiting flag burning is a violation of free speech. Again, not surprising that 'liberal' leaning judges would err on the side of authoritarianism in their interpretation of the Constitution.Squirt said:
The word "allow" in this context does not carry the same meaning as "authorizes" or "empowers" or "grants power to" or whatever else. It means "does not prohibit." The First Amendment, in the opinion of Justice Stevens and the other dissenters (Justices White, O'Connor, and Rehnquist), does not prohibit the states from criminalizing flag burning.oregonblitzkrieg said:
HTFH. Go back to school little fish.Squirt said:In fact, I disagree with Justice Stevens' conclusion that the First Amendment allows a state to criminalize flag burning.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Here's a fun little test of OBK's constitutional knowledge. Notice that the First Amendment explicitly applies to "Congress," but not the states. How could it be that the states are subject to the First Amendment's protections of free speech?
The 2nd amendment backs up the first amendment. Millions of Americans own guns, will refuse to ever turn them in, and are willing, if need be, to use them to depose any government or checkmate any fascist movement that attempts to infringe on these basic pillars of American freedom. You should consider that unspoken but settled law.
If by some miracle the Democratic party has managed to pull their collective heads out of their collective asses and Troomp doesn't win re-election, you will see it play out quite clearly. In fact, you actually make this point yourself all the tim. Don't back down now. You've been as excited about the prospect of chaotic revolution since the political banter started on this board. Very unmanly to walk it back now.
Where the fuck is @YellowSnow these dayz? -
Get your priorities straight. The fate of the country is being decided here!YellowSnow said:
I've been busy with family matters. Too late to the party on this one.creepycoug said:
In the 1960s? Yes. Today? No, those are most decidedly you guys.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Yeah, about that... I'm not the one agitating for revolution, those are your guys.ThomasFremont said:
Where were all the gun toting freedom lovers when privacy rights went *poof*??? Just admit that your little armed revolution fantasy is bullshit. Go play Call of Duty, boy.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Yeah, I'm aware of your side's fetish with these little 'fun facts.' I've been reading your shit philosophy on the DSA website, your side is using the same tactics to attack the 2nd amendment by trying to make the argument that the amendments don't apply to the states. I don't know if there's a legal way to attack this argument, I never claimed to be a constitutional lawyer. Here's what you should keep in mind though.Squirt said:
Um, yes, that's my opinion too, although you seem to have comprehended differently.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Prohibiting flag burning is a violation of free speech. Again, not surprising that 'liberal' leaning judges would err on the side of authoritarianism in their interpretation of the Constitution.Squirt said:
The word "allow" in this context does not carry the same meaning as "authorizes" or "empowers" or "grants power to" or whatever else. It means "does not prohibit." The First Amendment, in the opinion of Justice Stevens and the other dissenters (Justices White, O'Connor, and Rehnquist), does not prohibit the states from criminalizing flag burning.oregonblitzkrieg said:
HTFH. Go back to school little fish.Squirt said:In fact, I disagree with Justice Stevens' conclusion that the First Amendment allows a state to criminalize flag burning.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Here's a fun little test of OBK's constitutional knowledge. Notice that the First Amendment explicitly applies to "Congress," but not the states. How could it be that the states are subject to the First Amendment's protections of free speech?
The 2nd amendment backs up the first amendment. Millions of Americans own guns, will refuse to ever turn them in, and are willing, if need be, to use them to depose any government or checkmate any fascist movement that attempts to infringe on these basic pillars of American freedom. You should consider that unspoken but settled law.
If by some miracle the Democratic party has managed to pull their collective heads out of their collective asses and Troomp doesn't win re-election, you will see it play out quite clearly. In fact, you actually make this point yourself all the tim. Don't back down now. You've been as excited about the prospect of chaotic revolution since the political banter started on this board. Very unmanly to walk it back now.
Where the fuck is @YellowSnow these dayz? -
What's ironic is that you think the poast is ironic.USMChawk said:
Ironic that in the post you talk about other people’s intelligence you show you can’t count to 6.creepycoug said:Let me clear about
twoseven things:
1. I didn't watch the video.
2. I don't know who this guy is.
3. I don't care about 1. or 2.
4. I'm brilliant, handsome and fucking successful af.
5. The 2001 Miami Hurricanes would beat the ever loving shit out of the 1995 Nebraska Cornhuskers; I know this now because @Mosster47 said they couldn't.
7. I put people in my inner and extended social circles into two camps: those who understand civil protest, and those who do not.
8. Categorically, and w/o exception, every single person, EVERY - SINGLE - ONE, in the second group, range from not super smart to really fucking stupid. Tribal (hi @Swaye ), yes. Smart. No. I like them, I look out for them and I want them to be ok. But I know they're stupid, and that they probably can't help it.
@salemcoog , I still love you man. We still kewg homies, now & forever. And I know we've been doing so well; but today we may have to have our first love spat in months.
Sad. Sad, really.
Sorry.
-
I know. It's whitey. It's all whitey.RaceBannon said:
You're such a victimcreepycoug said:
Always about the hispanics with you.RaceBannon said:
I was just doing the job that illegal immigrants wouldn't. Straight out of high school.creepycoug said:
Kreist, you're from Olympia. Fish for steelhead for Peterman's sake. Herring is disgusting.RaceBannon said:I fished for herring at Paul's Bait
@dflea should weigh in on this.
Guess which fish feeds on herring hence their use as bait
Raysiss!!!!!!!!!!
Try being a victor instead -
Especially white hispanicscreepycoug said:
I know. It's whitey. It's all whitey.RaceBannon said:
You're such a victimcreepycoug said:
Always about the hispanics with you.RaceBannon said:
I was just doing the job that illegal immigrants wouldn't. Straight out of high school.creepycoug said:
Kreist, you're from Olympia. Fish for steelhead for Peterman's sake. Herring is disgusting.RaceBannon said:I fished for herring at Paul's Bait
@dflea should weigh in on this.
Guess which fish feeds on herring hence their use as bait
Raysiss!!!!!!!!!!
Try being a victor instead -
Hey butthole,salemcoog said:
Fishstick, despite my offer for help for his condition, no doubt ran his drift boat on the rocks again.creepycoug said:
Kreist, you're from Olympia. Fish for steelhead for Peterman's sake. Herring is disgusting.RaceBannon said:I fished for herring at Paul's Bait
@dflea should weigh in on this.
Sincerely,
Group 2 Vice President.
The only dent in my drift boat is from the original owner.
The dent in your forehead is from banging it against the headboard while you get plowed.
The only herring I eat is the chunk of pickled herring I eat on New years Eve to comply with family tradition. I've tried to make it a habit to not eat the bait. -
Zittles -
When everyone pretends to be stupid it’s hard to tell when someone truly is. Except hondo, he makes it pretty easy.creepycoug said:
What's ironic is that you think the poast is ironic.USMChawk said:
Ironic that in the post you talk about other people’s intelligence you show you can’t count to 6.creepycoug said:Let me clear about
twoseven things:
1. I didn't watch the video.
2. I don't know who this guy is.
3. I don't care about 1. or 2.
4. I'm brilliant, handsome and fucking successful af.
5. The 2001 Miami Hurricanes would beat the ever loving shit out of the 1995 Nebraska Cornhuskers; I know this now because @Mosster47 said they couldn't.
7. I put people in my inner and extended social circles into two camps: those who understand civil protest, and those who do not.
8. Categorically, and w/o exception, every single person, EVERY - SINGLE - ONE, in the second group, range from not super smart to really fucking stupid. Tribal (hi @Swaye ), yes. Smart. No. I like them, I look out for them and I want them to be ok. But I know they're stupid, and that they probably can't help it.
@salemcoog , I still love you man. We still kewg homies, now & forever. And I know we've been doing so well; but today we may have to have our first love spat in months.
Sad. Sad, really.
Sorry. -
They're the worst!!!!!!!!RaceBannon said:
Especially white hispanicscreepycoug said:
I know. It's whitey. It's all whitey.RaceBannon said:
You're such a victimcreepycoug said:
Always about the hispanics with you.RaceBannon said:
I was just doing the job that illegal immigrants wouldn't. Straight out of high school.creepycoug said:
Kreist, you're from Olympia. Fish for steelhead for Peterman's sake. Herring is disgusting.RaceBannon said:I fished for herring at Paul's Bait
@dflea should weigh in on this.
Guess which fish feeds on herring hence their use as bait
Raysiss!!!!!!!!!!
Try being a victor instead -
Rest in Power Trayvoncreepycoug said:
They're the worst!!!!!!!!RaceBannon said:
Especially white hispanicscreepycoug said:
I know. It's whitey. It's all whitey.RaceBannon said:
You're such a victimcreepycoug said:
Always about the hispanics with you.RaceBannon said:
I was just doing the job that illegal immigrants wouldn't. Straight out of high school.creepycoug said:
Kreist, you're from Olympia. Fish for steelhead for Peterman's sake. Herring is disgusting.RaceBannon said:I fished for herring at Paul's Bait
@dflea should weigh in on this.
Guess which fish feeds on herring hence their use as bait
Raysiss!!!!!!!!!!
Try being a victor instead
