I already see the Jim Mora up as the first candidate. When are you guys going to give the hire-the-alum-especially-from-Don-James-era trick a rest?
I like him as a HC here but I think Deruyter would be my #1. Looking at his games I see a team without a lot of talent in year 2 but they do nothing but win.
I already see the Jim Mora up as the first candidate. When are you guys going to give the hire-the-alum-especially-from-Don-James-era trick a rest?
I like him as a HC here but I think Deruyter would be my #1. Looking at his games I see a team without a lot of talent in year 2 but they do nothing but win.
I already see the Jim Mora up as the first candidate. When are you guys going to give the hire-the-alum-especially-from-Don-James-era trick a rest?
I like him as a HC here but I think Deruyter would be my #1. Looking at his games I see a team without a lot of talent in year 2 but they do nothing but win.
also Franklin from vanderbilt should be on the list. Not many coaches can win 9 games at vandy
It's definitely impressive at school like Vanderbilt, but it's a little misleading. He feasted on the bottom feeders of the SEC like Kentucky, and the OOC was the usual p**** SEC mix of teams like Wake Forest and Furman ( I'm too lazy to look it up but all four teams were weak). In fact I think either 8, We're all 9 of the winds were against below .500 teams.
Yeah, I looked back at Vandy's results under Franklin, it's misleading alright. He's done some good things down there in three seasons though, considering it's Vandy. This season they beat Georgia (#15 at the time). I realize Florida blows donkey this year, but they smoked the Gators 34-17 (in Gainesville, for the 1st time since 1945), snapping a 22 game losing streak vs UF.
I already see the Jim Mora up as the first candidate. When are you guys going to give the hire-the-alum-especially-from-Don-James-era trick a rest?
I like him as a HC here but I think Deruyter would be my #1. Looking at his games I see a team without a lot of talent in year 2 but they do nothing but win.
he is better than Sark, but so are a lot of guys.
but how many of them can we realistically poach?
I don't get any reason why Mora would ditch a gig like UCLA where he is obviously doing pretty well and being paid well. If you guys think loyalty to the big purple W is enough reason, think again.
That 3-25 when trailing at halftime stat is great. More facts the better. The hard core doogs will never change but a lot of the casual fans that never hear that need to be aware of this. You can spin 3-25.
My proudest stat that I could come up with. Really proves what we all thought that UW is a front running program under Sark.
This picture really says it all. Basically Sark's first four years were on the same par as Ty's 2006 and 2007, just he won the close games and Ty didn't.
Also looking at recruiting rankings six of the last seven years we've been in the top 30 and top 4 in the conference so no reason why UW isn't better than they are today.
Also I keep hearing you can't fire Sark because it will hurt recruiting yet as you see the lazy recruiter Ty produced classes of 35th, 29th and 14th and Gilbertson produced 22nd and 55th(lame duck status).
So if those turds can get pretty good classes to come here odds are anyone can.
Yep the site has already been mentioned on DM.com...at least one of the mods weighed in regarding your efforts...he sniffed at it and shook his head with breathtaking sophistication.
Yep the site has already been mentioned on DM.com...at least one of the mods weighed in regarding your efforts...he sniffed at it and shook his head with breathtaking sophistication.
Sounds like @BiggusDickus has some screenshots he needs to post of them ragging on the site.
I will be posting details on an inaugural meeting soon. For anyone in the Seattle metro area
Working on access to a certain bunker on campus with special meaning. Users will be PM'd a unique password and asked to recite on site to keep infiltrators out. This event will be catered by Dicks and a keg of Raindog to wash it down
Three point plan will be discussed and implemented
I will be posting details on an inaugural meeting soon. For anyone in the Seattle metro area
Working on access to a certain bunker on campus with special meaning. Users will be PM'd a unique password and asked to recite on site to keep infiltrators out. This event will be catered by Dicks and a keg of Raindog to wash it down
Three point plan will be discussed and implemented
Excellent. Well done getting the site up. My worthless opinion:
tone down some of the swearing if we're going to be sending this out to donors, media, fence-sitters and other such people who might be turned off by the foul language. Not that Lil' Kim doesn't deserve to be labeled a fucktard, he does, but we can keep that shit on HH. Keep the page as professional as possible, no exclamation marks, don't say 'pro-Sark stupidity', just have a 'fact sheet' section, 'coaching candidates' section and a 'debunking pro-Sarkisian arguments' section. We can aggregate all of the relevant facts and debunking points in this thread, or at least together on this forum.
To appeal to the broadest base we should keep it as classy as possible, just emphasize what our rightful place is in CFB and how the failures of the current regime are more than enough to justify a firing.
IMO Pete Lembo and Chuck Martin should be on the candidate list too. Among many others.
If anyone wants to make a logo, please do. I was thinking a Donald Trump "you're fired" pic combined with Sark's head.
We all know the list of reasons why Sark should be gone is endless and abundant. Therefore it will take me some time to organize the site. I'm thinking we'll have various sections. We'll have one on coaching candidates as well as a section that debunks all the stupid arguments originating from the usual suspects.
Send me your due diligence on anything (OL recruiting, coaching records, etc) and I'll post it on the site in the appropriate section.
My crappy website is more about DM.c than it is about Sark. While it may be useful to link to me from within posts from time to time, I'm not sure you want a banner link to "northwest football fucktards."
In essence, I agree with the folks saying that the presentation should be less breathless and angry, and more reason and logic. You're going after the persuadables, while the folks who think Sark and Pool Boy should be shitcanned are already posting here, for the most part.
I can tell you that keeping the site up-to-date will require some work and effort. If you can get a couple of people involved, that would probably help.
The subhead "UW Deserves & Can Do A Lot Better" could probably be crispened up, maybe simply "Mediocrity Is Not the Standard at Washington" or something like that.
Good work out of the gate. I'm looking forward to your website's development over the next few weeks.
Excellent. Well done getting the site up. My worthless opinion:
tone down some of the swearing if we're going to be sending this out to donors, media, fence-sitters and other such people who might be turned off by the foul language. Not that Lil' Kim doesn't deserve to be labeled a fucktard, he does, but we can keep that shit on HH. Keep the page as professional as possible, no exclamation marks, don't say 'pro-Sark stupidity', just have a 'fact sheet' section, 'coaching candidates' section and a 'debunking pro-Sarkisian arguments' section. We can aggregate all of the relevant facts and debunking points in this thread, or at least together on this forum.
To appeal to the broadest base we should keep it as classy as possible, just emphasize what our rightful place is in CFB and how the failures of the current regime are more than enough to justify a firing.
IMO Pete Lembo and Chuck Martin should be on the candidate list too. Among many others.
I'll be checking out the site more today but I want to emphasize what Gladstone said.
As much as we mock Kim, he has a point when he labeled us a fringe element. I don't think we're as fringe as he says but most people look at us, this site, our conversations and shake their heads. They might agree with us on some topics but we're too RUFF around the edges for most people.
Additionally, we are, for the most part, a bunch of negative, cynical, sarcastic assholes. Again, most people see that and shake their heads.
People want to feel good about themselves and the program. 7-6 is better than 0-12. It's not great but UW is staying out of the news and the perception is that it's a clean program so most people can point to it and say, "yeah, Sark's not great but he's improving and the program looks good." They want to feel good about themselves.
If Kim is right and we're a fringe group, I think we represent 10-20% of the fan population. Uber-Doogs like SF14AFS and Huskyclaus are on the other end of the spectrum representing another 10-20% of the fan population.
That leaves 60-80% of the fan population somewhere in the middle. They want to feel good about themselves and the football program. Most of them don't have the time to do the critical thinking necessary to understand why Sark isn't the guy. They know UW can do better but they don't have time to do the work to find out why or how. They listen to the so-called analysis from ESPN and KJR but don't take apart that analysis to see if it's based on sound logic and evidence.
With all that said, any site aimed at improving the the coaching situation at UW needs to be positive and simple. It doesn't need to be HH-lite. Leave the negativity and swearing here.
Comments
I think Boobs almost made him TDOTW.
Oh I hope next year Doogs will be saying "You have no idea the damage that Sarkisian had done".
Has this site been mentioned yet on Doogman? I'll have to post a link of this site to some Doog fucktards on twitter.
This picture really says it all. Basically Sark's first four years were on the same par as Ty's 2006 and 2007, just he won the close games and Ty didn't.
Also looking at recruiting rankings six of the last seven years we've been in the top 30 and top 4 in the conference so no reason why UW isn't better than they are today.
Also I keep hearing you can't fire Sark because it will hurt recruiting yet as you see the lazy recruiter Ty produced classes of 35th, 29th and 14th and Gilbertson produced 22nd and 55th(lame duck status).
So if those turds can get pretty good classes to come here odds are anyone can.
I will be posting details on an inaugural meeting soon. For anyone in the Seattle metro area
Working on access to a certain bunker on campus with special meaning. Users will be PM'd a unique password and asked to recite on site to keep infiltrators out. This event will be catered by Dicks and a keg of Raindog to wash it down
Three point plan will be discussed and implemented
- Lux sit
tone down some of the swearing if we're going to be sending this out to donors, media, fence-sitters and other such people who might be turned off by the foul language. Not that Lil' Kim doesn't deserve to be labeled a fucktard, he does, but we can keep that shit on HH. Keep the page as professional as possible, no exclamation marks, don't say 'pro-Sark stupidity', just have a 'fact sheet' section, 'coaching candidates' section and a 'debunking pro-Sarkisian arguments' section. We can aggregate all of the relevant facts and debunking points in this thread, or at least together on this forum.
To appeal to the broadest base we should keep it as classy as possible, just emphasize what our rightful place is in CFB and how the failures of the current regime are more than enough to justify a firing.
IMO Pete Lembo and Chuck Martin should be on the candidate list too. Among many others.
My crappy website is more about DM.c than it is about Sark. While it may be useful to link to me from within posts from time to time, I'm not sure you want a banner link to "northwest football fucktards."
In essence, I agree with the folks saying that the presentation should be less breathless and angry, and more reason and logic. You're going after the persuadables, while the folks who think Sark and Pool Boy should be shitcanned are already posting here, for the most part.
I can tell you that keeping the site up-to-date will require some work and effort. If you can get a couple of people involved, that would probably help.
The subhead "UW Deserves & Can Do A Lot Better" could probably be crispened up, maybe simply "Mediocrity Is Not the Standard at Washington" or something like that.
Good work out of the gate. I'm looking forward to your website's development over the next few weeks.
As much as we mock Kim, he has a point when he labeled us a fringe element. I don't think we're as fringe as he says but most people look at us, this site, our conversations and shake their heads. They might agree with us on some topics but we're too RUFF around the edges for most people.
Additionally, we are, for the most part, a bunch of negative, cynical, sarcastic assholes. Again, most people see that and shake their heads.
People want to feel good about themselves and the program. 7-6 is better than 0-12. It's not great but UW is staying out of the news and the perception is that it's a clean program so most people can point to it and say, "yeah, Sark's not great but he's improving and the program looks good." They want to feel good about themselves.
If Kim is right and we're a fringe group, I think we represent 10-20% of the fan population. Uber-Doogs like SF14AFS and Huskyclaus are on the other end of the spectrum representing another 10-20% of the fan population.
That leaves 60-80% of the fan population somewhere in the middle. They want to feel good about themselves and the football program. Most of them don't have the time to do the critical thinking necessary to understand why Sark isn't the guy. They know UW can do better but they don't have time to do the work to find out why or how. They listen to the so-called analysis from ESPN and KJR but don't take apart that analysis to see if it's based on sound logic and evidence.
With all that said, any site aimed at improving the the coaching situation at UW needs to be positive and simple. It doesn't need to be HH-lite. Leave the negativity and swearing here.