Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Softy being questioned on Twitter about Peter's Call
@Softykjr one of my favorites: you guys ignoring peter last night when he presented valid points as to why sark should go
@JKing79 listened to every call. Nobody gets ignored.
@Softykjr you answered with the "who would you hire" question and he presented two pretty good options..then was ignored\
@JKing79 just wanted his answer. Not going to talk about candidates until there's an opening. And every call doesn't need a response
@Softykjr no but that call needed a response cause a lot of fans feel like he does..but its your show and you disagree fair enough
Does JKing post here?
0 ·
Comments
He didn't even try and acknowledge them and quickly got to the next call hoping everyone would forget that call.
But hes wrong about waiting till the end of the season. 28 hours ago this team still had a shot at a 9-3 season. Now, going 0-4 in the 4 toughest games, the season that is over, is officially over and a failure. The rest of the way all the talk should be about firing Sark. Anything else is just worthless.
I think this team is heading towards a 6-6 season with a 3-6 conference record. For all this Don James talk he only had two losing conference seasons when he went 3-4 in his second year and 3-5 in 1988 which he almost lost his job.
Lambrights worst conference record was 4-4(got him fired btw in 1998), Slick Rick's was 4-4(also last year at UW). Even Gilby in 2003 went 4-4. Ty Willingham was 3-6 in 2006 so that is the par that Sark would be in if he loses out which I think he will.
When he loses next week he'll have had a worst conference record than Lambo and Slick Rick had when they were fired and worse than Gilby in 2003.
If he is on your show then he actually has to face the music. When it becomes uncomfortable he won't be able to boot you.
He's talking a good game but he won't ever show. I'd love to see him on there without the protection of the mute button so he has to actually defend his stupidity.
He brings up who beat the better team, schedule, we played common opponents better, blah blah blah. Completely ignores who has the better conference record and overall record.