Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Time to Embarrass Yourself Again!!! Predict UW's 2018 team record!!!

13»

Comments

  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,990
    13-2 or 12-2 or 11-2 (Rose or NY6)
    Oops, forgot to save the results from earlier.


  • SECDAWG
    SECDAWG Member Posts: 5,004
    13-2 or 12-2 or 11-2 (Rose or NY6)
    Sources said:

    PurpleJ said:

    I hope we lose the natty so I can talk mad shit to @oregonblitzkrieg

    That title game loss will make us ELITE
    Puh..13 and 2.

  • Ballz
    Ballz Member Posts: 4,735
    edited August 2018
    10-3
    10-3. The national media and Pac-12 media keep hyping up UW as a Playoff contender and I don't get it. As long as Jake Browning is the starting QB and our #1 WR is Aaron Fuller this team fucking sucks until they don't. The X-factor that could get this team above a 10-3 season is Bush Hamdan. We need him to be the super star we think he is. We need Kyle Shanahan 2.0. We need a simplistic and efficient offense. We need Browning to be a game manager and we need to matriculate the ball down the field. We need to run the ball. We need a lot of easy check down throws to TE's and RB's. We need route concepts that put DB's in vices and give Browning easy reads and safe, timing throws. We probably need to play with a higher tempo because Browning seems way less panicky in uptempo situations.

  • jhfstyle24
    jhfstyle24 Member Posts: 3,255
    Anywhere from 9-4 to 1-11

    10-3. The national media and Pac-12 media keep hyping up UW as a Playoff contender and I don't get it. As long as Jake Browning is the starting QB and our #1 WR is Aaron Fuller this team fucking sucks until they don't. The X-factor that could get this team above a 10-3 season is Bush Hamdan. We need him to be the super star we think he is. We need Kyle Shanahan 2.0. We need a simplistic and efficient offense. We need Browning to be a game manager and we need to matriculate the ball down the field. We need to run the ball. We need a lot of easy check down throws to TE's and RB's. We need route concepts that put DB's in vices and give Browning easy reads and safe, timing throws. We probably need to play with a higher tempo because Browning seems way less panicky in uptempo situations.

    It is because our DBs are so ridiculously loaded and they think Brownsocks is good.

    If Gaskin gets 20 carries a game we go undefeated. I have no faith he will.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    13-2 or 12-2 or 11-2 (Rose or NY6)

    10-3. The national media and Pac-12 media keep hyping up UW as a Playoff contender and I don't get it. As long as Jake Browning is the starting QB and our #1 WR is Aaron Fuller this team fucking sucks until they don't. The X-factor that could get this team above a 10-3 season is Bush Hamdan. We need him to be the super star we think he is. We need Kyle Shanahan 2.0. We need a simplistic and efficient offense. We need Browning to be a game manager and we need to matriculate the ball down the field. We need to run the ball. We need a lot of easy check down throws to TE's and RB's. We need route concepts that put DB's in vices and give Browning easy reads and safe, timing throws. We probably need to play with a higher tempo because Browning seems way less panicky in uptempo situations.

    Uhhh he's terrible when time's running out and we need a score, not sure tempo is the solution
  • SyphilisButter
    SyphilisButter Member Posts: 221
    10-3

    10-3. The national media and Pac-12 media keep hyping up UW as a Playoff contender and I don't get it. As long as Jake Browning is the starting QB and our #1 WR is Aaron Fuller this team fucking sucks until they don't. The X-factor that could get this team above a 10-3 season is Bush Hamdan. We need him to be the super star we think he is. We need Kyle Shanahan 2.0. We need a simplistic and efficient offense. We need Browning to be a game manager and we need to matriculate the ball down the field. We need to run the ball. We need a lot of easy check down throws to TE's and RB's. We need route concepts that put DB's in vices and give Browning easy reads and safe, timing throws. We probably need to play with a higher tempo because Browning seems way less panicky in uptempo situations.

    Almost chinned this because it was great...until your last sentence. When did tempo work well for Jake? Examples.
  • Ballz
    Ballz Member Posts: 4,735
    10-3

    10-3. The national media and Pac-12 media keep hyping up UW as a Playoff contender and I don't get it. As long as Jake Browning is the starting QB and our #1 WR is Aaron Fuller this team fucking sucks until they don't. The X-factor that could get this team above a 10-3 season is Bush Hamdan. We need him to be the super star we think he is. We need Kyle Shanahan 2.0. We need a simplistic and efficient offense. We need Browning to be a game manager and we need to matriculate the ball down the field. We need to run the ball. We need a lot of easy check down throws to TE's and RB's. We need route concepts that put DB's in vices and give Browning easy reads and safe, timing throws. We probably need to play with a higher tempo because Browning seems way less panicky in uptempo situations.

    Almost chinned this because it was great...until your last sentence. When did tempo work well for Jake? Examples.
    When has it not worked well? Browning has always performed better with tempo throughout his career at UW. They have used it as a way to try to spark the offense when they're playing like shit. When they were able to move the ball against Penn State they played with more tempo and sometimes called two plays at once in the huddle and ran them back to back. Coming out of half time against Colorado in which they sucked in the first half they played with more tempo to start the second half and the offense got going. The last couple drives against Utah that won us the game were more uptempo. The second half of the Rutgers game they played more uptempo and started moving the ball better. How did you not notice this?
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    Anywhere from 9-4 to 1-11

    10-3. The national media and Pac-12 media keep hyping up UW as a Playoff contender and I don't get it. As long as Jake Browning is the starting QB and our #1 WR is Aaron Fuller this team fucking sucks until they don't. The X-factor that could get this team above a 10-3 season is Bush Hamdan. We need him to be the super star we think he is. We need Kyle Shanahan 2.0. We need a simplistic and efficient offense. We need Browning to be a game manager and we need to matriculate the ball down the field. We need to run the ball. We need a lot of easy check down throws to TE's and RB's. We need route concepts that put DB's in vices and give Browning easy reads and safe, timing throws. We probably need to play with a higher tempo because Browning seems way less panicky in uptempo situations.



    50 percent pass. 40 percent run.







    10 percent pants shitting.

  • dtd
    dtd Member Posts: 5,243 Standard Supporter
    13-2 or 12-2 or 11-2 (Rose or NY6)
    I don't see 2 conference losses and I don't see UW losing to anyone in the south in the CCG, so that pretty much means an 11 win season.
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,990
    13-2 or 12-2 or 11-2 (Rose or NY6)
    Timely bump
  • NorwegianHusky
    NorwegianHusky Member Posts: 3,425
    Anywhere from 9-4 to 1-11
    Called it?
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,990
    13-2 or 12-2 or 11-2 (Rose or NY6)
    Only 30% of the bored can be correct this year
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,990
    13-2 or 12-2 or 11-2 (Rose or NY6)
    Bump.

    Final record is 10-4... but there was no 10-4 option. Whoops.

    You can proceed to burn down this thread.

    Better luck next year.
  • Doog_de_Jour
    Doog_de_Jour Member Posts: 8,041 Standard Supporter
    10-3
    Hey, I was close!
  • Mad_Son
    Mad_Son Member Posts: 10,194
    10-3

    Hey, I was close!

    Agreed. Really the best possible given the flawed choices.
  • Cougarfs
    Cougarfs Member Posts: 53
    Anywhere from 9-4 to 1-11
    9-4 another boring mediocre season with a couple baffling losses
  • DoogCourics
    DoogCourics Member Posts: 5,739
    15-0 (win natty)
    Did I win?
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,715 Founders Club
    15-0 (win natty)
    What did I pick?
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,715 Founders Club
    15-0 (win natty)
    Ooops
  • Houhusky
    Houhusky Member Posts: 5,537
    10-3
    Oh, I was correct again... unsurprised

    2015, 2017, and 2018 all called correctly