Collusion isn't a crime

2001400ex

http://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1023904111866077184

RaceBannon

And?

insinceredawg

This sounds convincing.

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1024263146008207361

2001400ex

RaceBannon said:

And?

Collusion isn't a crime. Are you illiterate?

RaceBannon

So it's not a crime

What the fuck is your point

2001400ex

RaceBannon said:

So it's not a crime

What the fuck is your point

I'm just giving you information. Like Jake Browning is hell bent on proving naysayers wrong.

Sledog

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

So it's not a crime

What the fuck is your point

I'm just giving you information. Like Jake Browning is hell bent on proving naysayers wrong.

Post up the U.S. code for collusion.

Sledog

The American people say "fuck off"!

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/07/31/fox-news-takes-biggest-bite-out-basic-cable-in-july-including-shark-week.html

ThomasFremont

Sledog said:

The American people say "fuck off"!

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/07/31/fox-news-takes-biggest-bite-out-basic-cable-in-july-including-shark-week.html

Let’s take cues from people watching cable news. That’s the smart thing to do.

DawgFader

Bluntness

PostGameOrangeSlices

Hondo still playing checkers

Sledog

ThomasFremont said:

Sledog said:

The American people say "fuck off"!

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/07/31/fox-news-takes-biggest-bite-out-basic-cable-in-july-including-shark-week.html

Let’s take cues from people watching cable news. That’s the smart thing to do.

What no link to the US code concerning collusion?

This is the problem when one starts an investigation without a crime. No crime was identified nor committed yet voila an investigation of unlimited scope to find a crime. That's backwards boys and girls. A is committed and then we look for a suspect based on evidence. We don't find a suspect and then look for a crime.

ThomasFremont

Sledog said:

ThomasFremont said:

Sledog said:

The American people say "fuck off"!

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/07/31/fox-news-takes-biggest-bite-out-basic-cable-in-july-including-shark-week.html

Let’s take cues from people watching cable news. That’s the smart thing to do.

What no link to the US code concerning collusion?

This is the problem when one starts an investigation without a crime. No crime was identified nor committed yet voila an investigation of unlimited scope to find a crime. That's backwards boys and girls. A is committed and then we look for a suspect based on evidence. We don't find a suspect and then look for a crime.

Without a crime? We already have multiple guilty pleas in the books. Tick...tick...tick...

2001400ex

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

Hondo still playing checkers

I got my Kings on. Bitch.

Sledog

ThomasFremont said:

Sledog said:

ThomasFremont said:

Sledog said:

The American people say "fuck off"!

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/07/31/fox-news-takes-biggest-bite-out-basic-cable-in-july-including-shark-week.html

Let’s take cues from people watching cable news. That’s the smart thing to do.

What no link to the US code concerning collusion?

This is the problem when one starts an investigation without a crime. No crime was identified nor committed yet voila an investigation of unlimited scope to find a crime. That's backwards boys and girls. A is committed and then we look for a suspect based on evidence. We don't find a suspect and then look for a crime.

Without a crime? We already have multiple guilty pleas in the books. Tick...tick...tick...

Really? Which one was for collusion?

ThomasFremont

Sledog said:

ThomasFremont said:

Sledog said:

ThomasFremont said:

Sledog said:

The American people say "fuck off"!

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/07/31/fox-news-takes-biggest-bite-out-basic-cable-in-july-including-shark-week.html

Let’s take cues from people watching cable news. That’s the smart thing to do.

What no link to the US code concerning collusion?

This is the problem when one starts an investigation without a crime. No crime was identified nor committed yet voila an investigation of unlimited scope to find a crime. That's backwards boys and girls. A is committed and then we look for a suspect based on evidence. We don't find a suspect and then look for a crime.

Without a crime? We already have multiple guilty pleas in the books. Tick...tick...tick...

Really? Which one was for collusion?

LIPO

Kaepsknee

ThomasFremont said:

Sledog said:

ThomasFremont said:

Sledog said:

The American people say "fuck off"!

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/07/31/fox-news-takes-biggest-bite-out-basic-cable-in-july-including-shark-week.html

Let’s take cues from people watching cable news. That’s the smart thing to do.

What no link to the US code concerning collusion?

This is the problem when one starts an investigation without a crime. No crime was identified nor committed yet voila an investigation of unlimited scope to find a crime. That's backwards boys and girls. A is committed and then we look for a suspect based on evidence. We don't find a suspect and then look for a crime.

Without a crime? We already have multiple guilty pleas in the books. Tick...tick...tick...

But nothing that takes down a presidency though, right?

RaceBannon

We have a dog and pony show to give Tommy a talking point