Kingsley Ah You Suamataia, 2021 4* OL, Orem (HS), UT (Offered 6/22/18)
Comments
-
This is starting to sound like Sark.RoadDawg55 said:
Yep. Baccallia and Lucciano’s bad plays vs Cal. Change those and we win.CallMeBigErn said:
Just so we're clear, UW has recruited better than Oregon every year since 2016, per 247 average recruit rankings, and that doesn't look to be changing this year or next. Recruiting is not the issue right now. We're about 5 plays from being 7-1 at least and the narrative would be completely different. Football is a cruel mistress.whuggy said:
Oh I get that. My comment was based more on what appears to be a pretty buttoned up UW football culture. It is okay for kids to have some fun. Jeez if you can't get a little loose at a recruiting photo shoot then what the hell? I think Oregon offering 300 kids is stupid but there are a number of elements in their recruiting approach that they are clearly better at.BleachedAnusDawg said:
That kind of stuff might be attractive to some kids, but not all. I think there needs to be a small reality accepted that not every kid will want to go to UW regardless of how Pete sells the program. You can't change your sales pitch based on who you're selling to every time you contact a recruit. Or, maybe you can and that's how you end up making 400 offers each cycle.whuggy said:
How about a small dose of honesty here. The kid looks like he is having a great time in that video. While ours look like manikins next to the cardboard cutout. It would be nice if Pete remembered that kids play this game for fun and loosened up a couple of degrees. Then again. This program isn't for everybody.BleachedAnusDawg said:
That doesn't really seem to be why this kid is interested in Oregon over UW.animate said:Kids are kids. Peterman is fucking up the whole recruiting vibe because of seniority and stupid ass playcalling and personnel decisions straight from Benny Hill.
How do you expect to be recruiting when you lose to Oregon, keep Kingsley's cousin Puka on the bench when he's your best receiver outside of black beast ... While you play fucktard baccelia over and over ...
This shit comes back to bite you in the ass Peterman! Get your shit together. "It's not for everyone" fuck off.
Losing isn't for everyone. Gaining a bad rep isn't for everyone either ... that's why people go elsewhere to winners ...
I'm not a recruiting expert at all, but people need to accept that we are never going to get every kid we want regardless of what Pete does or does not do.
3rd and 2 vs Oregon. Even if we converted there was a ways to go, but it was big. Early on, Pleasant’s drop and the late hit by Turner on Herbert the first drives of the game.
Change those 3 and we are 7-1 despite the holes in the roster. -
The dooging is real.FremontTroll said:
This is starting to sound like Sark.RoadDawg55 said:
Yep. Baccallia and Lucciano’s bad plays vs Cal. Change those and we win.CallMeBigErn said:
Just so we're clear, UW has recruited better than Oregon every year since 2016, per 247 average recruit rankings, and that doesn't look to be changing this year or next. Recruiting is not the issue right now. We're about 5 plays from being 7-1 at least and the narrative would be completely different. Football is a cruel mistress.whuggy said:
Oh I get that. My comment was based more on what appears to be a pretty buttoned up UW football culture. It is okay for kids to have some fun. Jeez if you can't get a little loose at a recruiting photo shoot then what the hell? I think Oregon offering 300 kids is stupid but there are a number of elements in their recruiting approach that they are clearly better at.BleachedAnusDawg said:
That kind of stuff might be attractive to some kids, but not all. I think there needs to be a small reality accepted that not every kid will want to go to UW regardless of how Pete sells the program. You can't change your sales pitch based on who you're selling to every time you contact a recruit. Or, maybe you can and that's how you end up making 400 offers each cycle.whuggy said:
How about a small dose of honesty here. The kid looks like he is having a great time in that video. While ours look like manikins next to the cardboard cutout. It would be nice if Pete remembered that kids play this game for fun and loosened up a couple of degrees. Then again. This program isn't for everybody.BleachedAnusDawg said:
That doesn't really seem to be why this kid is interested in Oregon over UW.animate said:Kids are kids. Peterman is fucking up the whole recruiting vibe because of seniority and stupid ass playcalling and personnel decisions straight from Benny Hill.
How do you expect to be recruiting when you lose to Oregon, keep Kingsley's cousin Puka on the bench when he's your best receiver outside of black beast ... While you play fucktard baccelia over and over ...
This shit comes back to bite you in the ass Peterman! Get your shit together. "It's not for everyone" fuck off.
Losing isn't for everyone. Gaining a bad rep isn't for everyone either ... that's why people go elsewhere to winners ...
I'm not a recruiting expert at all, but people need to accept that we are never going to get every kid we want regardless of what Pete does or does not do.
3rd and 2 vs Oregon. Even if we converted there was a ways to go, but it was big. Early on, Pleasant’s drop and the late hit by Turner on Herbert the first drives of the game.
Change those 3 and we are 7-1 despite the holes in the roster.
-
How that can be true? Sark's teams either won or got ass blasted.FremontTroll said:
This is starting to sound like Sark.RoadDawg55 said:
Yep. Baccallia and Lucciano’s bad plays vs Cal. Change those and we win.CallMeBigErn said:
Just so we're clear, UW has recruited better than Oregon every year since 2016, per 247 average recruit rankings, and that doesn't look to be changing this year or next. Recruiting is not the issue right now. We're about 5 plays from being 7-1 at least and the narrative would be completely different. Football is a cruel mistress.whuggy said:
Oh I get that. My comment was based more on what appears to be a pretty buttoned up UW football culture. It is okay for kids to have some fun. Jeez if you can't get a little loose at a recruiting photo shoot then what the hell? I think Oregon offering 300 kids is stupid but there are a number of elements in their recruiting approach that they are clearly better at.BleachedAnusDawg said:
That kind of stuff might be attractive to some kids, but not all. I think there needs to be a small reality accepted that not every kid will want to go to UW regardless of how Pete sells the program. You can't change your sales pitch based on who you're selling to every time you contact a recruit. Or, maybe you can and that's how you end up making 400 offers each cycle.whuggy said:
How about a small dose of honesty here. The kid looks like he is having a great time in that video. While ours look like manikins next to the cardboard cutout. It would be nice if Pete remembered that kids play this game for fun and loosened up a couple of degrees. Then again. This program isn't for everybody.BleachedAnusDawg said:
That doesn't really seem to be why this kid is interested in Oregon over UW.animate said:Kids are kids. Peterman is fucking up the whole recruiting vibe because of seniority and stupid ass playcalling and personnel decisions straight from Benny Hill.
How do you expect to be recruiting when you lose to Oregon, keep Kingsley's cousin Puka on the bench when he's your best receiver outside of black beast ... While you play fucktard baccelia over and over ...
This shit comes back to bite you in the ass Peterman! Get your shit together. "It's not for everyone" fuck off.
Losing isn't for everyone. Gaining a bad rep isn't for everyone either ... that's why people go elsewhere to winners ...
I'm not a recruiting expert at all, but people need to accept that we are never going to get every kid we want regardless of what Pete does or does not do.
3rd and 2 vs Oregon. Even if we converted there was a ways to go, but it was big. Early on, Pleasant’s drop and the late hit by Turner on Herbert the first drives of the game.
Change those 3 and we are 7-1 despite the holes in the roster. -
I was thinking this same thing.CallMeBigErn said:
How that can be true? Sark's teams either won or got ass blasted.FremontTroll said:
This is starting to sound like Sark.RoadDawg55 said:
Yep. Baccallia and Lucciano’s bad plays vs Cal. Change those and we win.CallMeBigErn said:
Just so we're clear, UW has recruited better than Oregon every year since 2016, per 247 average recruit rankings, and that doesn't look to be changing this year or next. Recruiting is not the issue right now. We're about 5 plays from being 7-1 at least and the narrative would be completely different. Football is a cruel mistress.whuggy said:
Oh I get that. My comment was based more on what appears to be a pretty buttoned up UW football culture. It is okay for kids to have some fun. Jeez if you can't get a little loose at a recruiting photo shoot then what the hell? I think Oregon offering 300 kids is stupid but there are a number of elements in their recruiting approach that they are clearly better at.BleachedAnusDawg said:
That kind of stuff might be attractive to some kids, but not all. I think there needs to be a small reality accepted that not every kid will want to go to UW regardless of how Pete sells the program. You can't change your sales pitch based on who you're selling to every time you contact a recruit. Or, maybe you can and that's how you end up making 400 offers each cycle.whuggy said:
How about a small dose of honesty here. The kid looks like he is having a great time in that video. While ours look like manikins next to the cardboard cutout. It would be nice if Pete remembered that kids play this game for fun and loosened up a couple of degrees. Then again. This program isn't for everybody.BleachedAnusDawg said:
That doesn't really seem to be why this kid is interested in Oregon over UW.animate said:Kids are kids. Peterman is fucking up the whole recruiting vibe because of seniority and stupid ass playcalling and personnel decisions straight from Benny Hill.
How do you expect to be recruiting when you lose to Oregon, keep Kingsley's cousin Puka on the bench when he's your best receiver outside of black beast ... While you play fucktard baccelia over and over ...
This shit comes back to bite you in the ass Peterman! Get your shit together. "It's not for everyone" fuck off.
Losing isn't for everyone. Gaining a bad rep isn't for everyone either ... that's why people go elsewhere to winners ...
I'm not a recruiting expert at all, but people need to accept that we are never going to get every kid we want regardless of what Pete does or does not do.
3rd and 2 vs Oregon. Even if we converted there was a ways to go, but it was big. Early on, Pleasant’s drop and the late hit by Turner on Herbert the first drives of the game.
Change those 3 and we are 7-1 despite the holes in the roster.
5-4
5 close wins. 4 anal rape losses -
Sark would always say his 7-6 squad was just a few plays from winning ten games or the conference or whatever.CallMeBigErn said:
How that can be true? Sark's teams either won or got ass blasted.FremontTroll said:
This is starting to sound like Sark.RoadDawg55 said:
Yep. Baccallia and Lucciano’s bad plays vs Cal. Change those and we win.CallMeBigErn said:
Just so we're clear, UW has recruited better than Oregon every year since 2016, per 247 average recruit rankings, and that doesn't look to be changing this year or next. Recruiting is not the issue right now. We're about 5 plays from being 7-1 at least and the narrative would be completely different. Football is a cruel mistress.whuggy said:
Oh I get that. My comment was based more on what appears to be a pretty buttoned up UW football culture. It is okay for kids to have some fun. Jeez if you can't get a little loose at a recruiting photo shoot then what the hell? I think Oregon offering 300 kids is stupid but there are a number of elements in their recruiting approach that they are clearly better at.BleachedAnusDawg said:
That kind of stuff might be attractive to some kids, but not all. I think there needs to be a small reality accepted that not every kid will want to go to UW regardless of how Pete sells the program. You can't change your sales pitch based on who you're selling to every time you contact a recruit. Or, maybe you can and that's how you end up making 400 offers each cycle.whuggy said:
How about a small dose of honesty here. The kid looks like he is having a great time in that video. While ours look like manikins next to the cardboard cutout. It would be nice if Pete remembered that kids play this game for fun and loosened up a couple of degrees. Then again. This program isn't for everybody.BleachedAnusDawg said:
That doesn't really seem to be why this kid is interested in Oregon over UW.animate said:Kids are kids. Peterman is fucking up the whole recruiting vibe because of seniority and stupid ass playcalling and personnel decisions straight from Benny Hill.
How do you expect to be recruiting when you lose to Oregon, keep Kingsley's cousin Puka on the bench when he's your best receiver outside of black beast ... While you play fucktard baccelia over and over ...
This shit comes back to bite you in the ass Peterman! Get your shit together. "It's not for everyone" fuck off.
Losing isn't for everyone. Gaining a bad rep isn't for everyone either ... that's why people go elsewhere to winners ...
I'm not a recruiting expert at all, but people need to accept that we are never going to get every kid we want regardless of what Pete does or does not do.
3rd and 2 vs Oregon. Even if we converted there was a ways to go, but it was big. Early on, Pleasant’s drop and the late hit by Turner on Herbert the first drives of the game.
Change those 3 and we are 7-1 despite the holes in the roster.
I think it was 2013 fall camp he had a press conference that was lampooned on here because Sark said something like he considered the 2012 team a 10 win team. -
I remember thatFremontTroll said:
Sark would always say his 7-6 squad was just a few plays from winning ten games or the conference or whatever.CallMeBigErn said:
How that can be true? Sark's teams either won or got ass blasted.FremontTroll said:
This is starting to sound like Sark.RoadDawg55 said:
Yep. Baccallia and Lucciano’s bad plays vs Cal. Change those and we win.CallMeBigErn said:
Just so we're clear, UW has recruited better than Oregon every year since 2016, per 247 average recruit rankings, and that doesn't look to be changing this year or next. Recruiting is not the issue right now. We're about 5 plays from being 7-1 at least and the narrative would be completely different. Football is a cruel mistress.whuggy said:
Oh I get that. My comment was based more on what appears to be a pretty buttoned up UW football culture. It is okay for kids to have some fun. Jeez if you can't get a little loose at a recruiting photo shoot then what the hell? I think Oregon offering 300 kids is stupid but there are a number of elements in their recruiting approach that they are clearly better at.BleachedAnusDawg said:
That kind of stuff might be attractive to some kids, but not all. I think there needs to be a small reality accepted that not every kid will want to go to UW regardless of how Pete sells the program. You can't change your sales pitch based on who you're selling to every time you contact a recruit. Or, maybe you can and that's how you end up making 400 offers each cycle.whuggy said:
How about a small dose of honesty here. The kid looks like he is having a great time in that video. While ours look like manikins next to the cardboard cutout. It would be nice if Pete remembered that kids play this game for fun and loosened up a couple of degrees. Then again. This program isn't for everybody.BleachedAnusDawg said:
That doesn't really seem to be why this kid is interested in Oregon over UW.animate said:Kids are kids. Peterman is fucking up the whole recruiting vibe because of seniority and stupid ass playcalling and personnel decisions straight from Benny Hill.
How do you expect to be recruiting when you lose to Oregon, keep Kingsley's cousin Puka on the bench when he's your best receiver outside of black beast ... While you play fucktard baccelia over and over ...
This shit comes back to bite you in the ass Peterman! Get your shit together. "It's not for everyone" fuck off.
Losing isn't for everyone. Gaining a bad rep isn't for everyone either ... that's why people go elsewhere to winners ...
I'm not a recruiting expert at all, but people need to accept that we are never going to get every kid we want regardless of what Pete does or does not do.
3rd and 2 vs Oregon. Even if we converted there was a ways to go, but it was big. Early on, Pleasant’s drop and the late hit by Turner on Herbert the first drives of the game.
Change those 3 and we are 7-1 despite the holes in the roster.
I think it was 2013 fall camp he had a press conference that was lampooned on here because Sark said something like he considered the 2012 team a 10 win team.
Ty was the 5 plays away from winning an individual game guy -
The fact that Sark had so many blowout losses made it more ridiculous but it’s the same fallacious reasoning.
Out of 150+ plays in a game you are picking out the two or three that went the worst for you and ignoring any luck that went the other way. -
A little bit. We’re 5-3 and that’s the fact. People said this shit to fluff up Sark, especially in 2012 when doogs hammered that we should have been 9-4. Kim was the main one to always post it.FremontTroll said:
This is starting to sound like Sark.RoadDawg55 said:
Yep. Baccallia and Lucciano’s bad plays vs Cal. Change those and we win.CallMeBigErn said:
Just so we're clear, UW has recruited better than Oregon every year since 2016, per 247 average recruit rankings, and that doesn't look to be changing this year or next. Recruiting is not the issue right now. We're about 5 plays from being 7-1 at least and the narrative would be completely different. Football is a cruel mistress.whuggy said:
Oh I get that. My comment was based more on what appears to be a pretty buttoned up UW football culture. It is okay for kids to have some fun. Jeez if you can't get a little loose at a recruiting photo shoot then what the hell? I think Oregon offering 300 kids is stupid but there are a number of elements in their recruiting approach that they are clearly better at.BleachedAnusDawg said:
That kind of stuff might be attractive to some kids, but not all. I think there needs to be a small reality accepted that not every kid will want to go to UW regardless of how Pete sells the program. You can't change your sales pitch based on who you're selling to every time you contact a recruit. Or, maybe you can and that's how you end up making 400 offers each cycle.whuggy said:
How about a small dose of honesty here. The kid looks like he is having a great time in that video. While ours look like manikins next to the cardboard cutout. It would be nice if Pete remembered that kids play this game for fun and loosened up a couple of degrees. Then again. This program isn't for everybody.BleachedAnusDawg said:
That doesn't really seem to be why this kid is interested in Oregon over UW.animate said:Kids are kids. Peterman is fucking up the whole recruiting vibe because of seniority and stupid ass playcalling and personnel decisions straight from Benny Hill.
How do you expect to be recruiting when you lose to Oregon, keep Kingsley's cousin Puka on the bench when he's your best receiver outside of black beast ... While you play fucktard baccelia over and over ...
This shit comes back to bite you in the ass Peterman! Get your shit together. "It's not for everyone" fuck off.
Losing isn't for everyone. Gaining a bad rep isn't for everyone either ... that's why people go elsewhere to winners ...
I'm not a recruiting expert at all, but people need to accept that we are never going to get every kid we want regardless of what Pete does or does not do.
3rd and 2 vs Oregon. Even if we converted there was a ways to go, but it was big. Early on, Pleasant’s drop and the late hit by Turner on Herbert the first drives of the game.
Change those 3 and we are 7-1 despite the holes in the roster.
I’m just commenting that we were close. They should have been wins. Stanford was the only game we got beaten pretty soundly. I still think Pete has absolutely sucked this year and fucked over the season. -
The ILBs have been so bad it’s like the defense is playing a man down a lot of times.FremontTroll said:The fact that Sark had so many blowout losses made it more ridiculous but it’s the same fallacious reasoning.
Out of 150+ plays in a game you are picking out the two or three that went the worst for you and ignoring any luck that went the other way.
I don’t think it’s unfair to say things would look way different on the defense if just RS senior BBK were playing this year instead of basically playing a man down. It’s just that this year, even mediocre/average ILB play would be a massive improvement for the entire defense.
ATBS, this year it’s the WRs and ILB, in the past it’s been kicking or QB, by the time they fix ILB it will be something else. -
I think the defense has been trending down for a bit now. Not as glaring as this year but Penn State and Ohio State went through them like a hot knife through butter. We actually played good defense against Bama,
Thus year we are struggling more in league consistently instead of a 2017 Stanford once in awhile
