Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
WOOF!!!1!
Comments
-
Man, for a while here “Woof” had lost its potency, glad to see someone cutting some fentanyl into this batch!
-
Never felt better about our? chances.bananasnblondes said:
Eklund literally wrote yesterday that he feels Ngata has lost interest in UW. I love watching these intra-recruiting blog manager tiffs unfoldNEsnake12 said:Neighbor2972 said:Roof is being annoying and coy on twatter, something else could be coming
"Yeah my favorite color is orange" - Ngata, probably -
Flights are cheaper :-)AtomicDawg said:
Great time of year to go to Scottsdale.pat_hm said:Eklund was going to explain it all in the blog later in the week. Wanted to talk to the kid first unlike some of these other sites. They’ll be a pod too w/ recruiting talk once Kim gets back from Scottsdale. Fetters has the crud. Look for that late next week. Until then keep it locked to the boards for more news. It’s about to get crazy.
-
Looks like we finally got our big back...er.
Not the fastest is he? Seems to handle blockers well and has good quickness though. Obviously strength and hitting/tackling aren't a problem.
He also looks like a better QB prospect than some of the guys we've had to suffer through. -
This doesn't fit the "we? don't offer in-state kids" narrative...
-
Nope.DawgWagonDan said:This doesn't fit the "we? don't offer in-state kids" narrative...
It does fit the "be careful about offering in state kids because if you do they're liable to accept it within 5 hours" concept though. -
The problems has been "Why wait on offering the in state kids you know are going to be 4* and 5* recruits. There is no value in letting out of state schools come in and be their first offer especially when you know you are eventually going to offer.dnc said:
Nope.DawgWagonDan said:This doesn't fit the "we? don't offer in-state kids" narrative...
It does fit the "be careful about offering in state kids because if you do they're liable to accept it within 5 hours" concept though.
-
Agreed. Being diligent and thorough is a good thing, especially in-state. We? are not "OU" with our? offers and I am fine with our? current approach. Pete offers after they vet the recruits. This kid was MVP at their camps. Nothing wrong with that IMHO. The day we? lack several kids from Warshington in a single class is the day we? can panic; but I understand panic is the only commodity on these boredsdnc said:
Nope.DawgWagonDan said:This doesn't fit the "we? don't offer in-state kids" narrative...
It does fit the "be careful about offering in state kids because if you do they're liable to accept it within 5 hours" concept though.in spring so...
*self corrected -
Neighbor2972 said:
Roof is being annoying and coy on twatter, something else could be coming
