Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

PM to Fans of loser schools (WSU, Oregon, ASU, et all)

1235789

Comments

  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,286
    haie said:

    Whatever about Oregon. They were good. Probably underachieved.

    But I love the Playoff smack.

    You got fucking destroyed against a b1g team full of freshmen. Jesus

    You're not talking about that Ohio State team and Ezekial Elliott?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,286
    edited May 2018
    Doogles said:

    Doogles said:

    Rubberfist said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    Winning on the field is the standard of the current era. You can't 'win' something that's handed out by default. Voted natties are for doogs living in the past. It's all they can cling too after the heartbreaking Bama loss.

    So the 1995 Nebraska team was illegitimate because they didn’t win it on the field?
    Anyone who doubts Tommy Frasier and Lawrence Phillips in the same backfield can shut the fuck up.





    Can we hyper analyze this. Look at that 6 foot 220 running back make that cut back, break about 7 tackles, and high step it in. How demoralizing it must be to be an SEC DB and watch a bigger man run past you.

    Meanwhile Tommie Frazier breaks another 11 tackles and is so board with the lack of competition he actually looks back to see if people are still competing. And they weren't.

    That was the biggest game of Steve Spurriers career and that Hall of Fame coach couldn't make them try. Mid 90s Nebraska is GOAT imo.
    Bull shit.

    Just as a little refresher, that Florida defense was as soft as the French resistance. That game is the reason Bob Stoops was hired to be D coordinator at Florida. Once that happened, it was lights out.

    Phillips was a CLASSIC Nebraska I back. They are unbelievable bullies at what they do until you take it away. What you need to take it away isn't complicated: you need the athletes who can, without struggling, run sideline to sideline with you, and who can handle a physical inside running game, because that explains about 99.5% of Nebraska's offense in those days.

    Note, too, how many Nebraska I backs were shit in the NFL once they had to start running between the tackles and actually show some vision and moves. NFL defenses blow that Power I option shit right the fuck up just organically with personnel. Let me explain further. Rich Alexis (member him?) would have been a great Nebraska I back. What ever happened to Rich?

    A fast and physical defense could have handled that team. Tommie ran it as good as anyone ever, but you're getting carried away. The 01, 91, 86 and 89 Miami defenses shut that shit down COLD. 91 Washington shuts that shit down COLD. Probably some of the mid-90s Florida State defenses do too - Boulware, Brooks and those guys. No way you're running around them, and if you punch them in the mouth up the middle, they punch back.

    You are basing all this hype on a show against a soft as fuck defense.

    And I'm not sure where you're getting that it was Spurrier's biggest game. He coached in a few. He beat Peyton Manning every year he played at Tennessee. He beat Gene Stallings at Alabama 5 out of 6 times. And he won a title in the Sugar in 1996. Why is a loss his biggest gayme? You must be a Husker fan.

    In terms of GOAT, the 2001 Miami team beats that Nebraska team. Miami was better at more things and had a more balanced offense.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 26,148 Standard Supporter
    lol just off the top of my head, I can think of four or five NFL players from the 91 team's offense

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,286
    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    lol just off the top of my head, I can think of four or five NFL players from the 91 team's offense

    While the comment that the 91 team with no offense shows somebody didn't do their homework, I'm struggling to figure out who they were.

    Kennedy had a real career. If you're counting Bruener then, yeah, he did too. Weren't the rest of the guys either cup 'o coffee or career journeymen? Berry and Bryant didn't really have careers, nor did McKay or Bailey. Who are you thinking about? Maybe Cunningham? I think he started for a while. The real NFL success of that crew, offense or defense, was Lincoln. Almost all of the other guys didn't pan out.

    You're probably also thinking of Brunnell, but he didn't play that year.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter