Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Elite 8 (1960's) - #1 The Beatles vs #2 The Rolling Stones

YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,435 Founders Club



Elite 8 (1960's) - #1 The Beatles vs #2 The Rolling Stones 54 votes

#1 The Beatles
46%
DerekJohnsonFire_Marshall_BillHuskyJWThomasFremontMad_SonDennis_DeYoungUWhuskytskeetYouKnowItGladstoneCokeGreaterThanPepsiTheHBchuckoregonblitzkriegTequillaBad_MotherDuckeruziLebamDawgDoog_de_JourBearsWiinjhfstyle24 25 votes
#2 The Rolling Stones
53%
CFetters_Nacho_LoverSwayewhlinderSoutherndawgRoadDawg55DeepSeaZAZDuckPurpleJBlackiedncdfleaPurpleThrobberDude61GrundleStiltzkinKaepskneebrentsEwaDawgAlexisPitchfork51theknowledge 29 votes
«13

Comments

  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,435 Founders Club
    #2 The Rolling Stones
    The is the one the great all tim rock and roll debate. I was a Beatle freak as a kid and all through most of HS. Then my senior I bought "Let it Bleed" on CD because I though the album cover looked really cool. Everything changed for my after listening to that record and things have never been the same since.
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,435 Founders Club
    #2 The Rolling Stones

    The Beatles led the Stones around by the nose.

    The Stones have some great shit, but they were always riding on the wave and the Beatles always created the wave.

    I always think of it as the Beatles changed the culture and the Stones reflected the culture.

    Hence this as a no-brainer for me.

    Beatles are the most influential rock of all time, but the Stones are a very close second IMHO . The Stones were the original harder sounding rock group with a bad boy image. Jagger is the OG front man and everyone that came after was influenced by his shtick (borrowed heavily of course from James Brown and other bad ass blicks). What tips scales for me with the Stones is the duration of the time period where they were commercially and artistically relevant far exceeds that of anyone else in the business. They basically were a top 2 band in the world from 1964 to 1981 so almost two decades. No other artist in the Elite 8 here can touch that. Plus Beggars, Let it Bleed, Sticky and Exile is the greatest 4 album winning streak in rock history.
  • UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 15,824 Swaye's Wigwam
    #2 The Rolling Stones
    I'd still rather listen to a Stones album if you put a gun to my head so they got the vote.
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,880
    #1 The Beatles
    Beatles are more influential and that goes a long way to me

    There’s some Stones stuff I really like (led by Paint it Black) and other stuff that I am indifferent to.

    For me an easy call
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,885
    #2 The Rolling Stones
    Beatles were great. But the Stones were better.
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,435 Founders Club
    #2 The Rolling Stones
    salemcoog said:

    Beatles were great. But the Stones were better.

    Probably the smartest thing anyone has said in the several years I've been here.
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,435 Founders Club
    #2 The Rolling Stones
    We need more time Stones fans but not to fear time is on our side.
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,226 Standard Supporter
    #2 The Rolling Stones

    We need more time Stones fans but not to fear time is on our side.

    You got your alt handles laying in wait?
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,435 Founders Club
    #2 The Rolling Stones

    We need more time Stones fans but not to fear time is on our side.

    You got your alt handles laying in wait?
    @JerryHallDawg ??
  • NEsnake12NEsnake12 Member Posts: 3,792
    #2 The Rolling Stones

    We need more time Stones fans but not to fear time is on our side.

    I tied it.

    My Grandpa was in college during the mid to late 60s, Stones are his all time favorite. He's had me listening to them with him since I was in diapers. Love never faded for me.
  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 26,950
    #2 The Rolling Stones
    Gregorian chanting > top 8
  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,494 Founders Club
    #2 The Rolling Stones
    @Cohen12 is warming up in the bullpen.
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,435 Founders Club
    #2 The Rolling Stones
    Swaye said:

    @Cohen12 is warming up in the bullpen.

    Where the frick is @89ute in the most important pole of his life?


  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 26,950
    #2 The Rolling Stones

    Swaye said:

    @Cohen12 is warming up in the bullpen.

    Where the frick is @89ute in the most important pole of his life?


    The temple?
  • BleachedAnusDawgBleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 11,557
    #1 The Beatles
    Stones voters have no actual, logical claim to say they are better than The Beatles. They are The Beatles' little brother. You faggots are all voting for Oregon over UW in this poll!
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,435 Founders Club
    #2 The Rolling Stones

    Stones voters have no actual, logical claim to say they are better than The Beatles. They are The Beatles' little brother. You faggots are all voting for Oregon over UW in this poll!

    Faggots my arse. I can guarantee-god-damned-tee you I've spent more hours listening to Beatles records in the past 30 years than any man, women, or child (hi @backthepack ) here.
  • Dennis_DeYoungDennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    #1 The Beatles

    Stones voters have no actual, logical claim to say they are better than The Beatles. They are The Beatles' little brother. You faggots are all voting for Oregon over UW in this poll!

    Faggots my arse. I can guarantee-god-damned-tee you I've spent more hours listening to Beatles records in the past 30 years than any man, women, or child (hi @backthepack ) here.
    Wrong.
  • backthepackbackthepack Member Posts: 19,861
    #2 The Rolling Stones

    Stones voters have no actual, logical claim to say they are better than The Beatles. They are The Beatles' little brother. You faggots are all voting for Oregon over UW in this poll!

    Faggots my arse. I can guarantee-god-damned-tee you I've spent more hours listening to Beatles records in the past 30 years than any man, women, or child (hi @backthepack ) here.

Sign In or Register to comment.