Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Round 2 (late 1970's to mid 1980s) - #2 Fleetwood Mac vs #7 Queen

YellowSnow
YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,856 Founders Club





Round 2 (late 1970's to mid 1980s) - #2 Fleetwood Mac vs #7 Queen 43 votes

#2 Fleetwood Mac
34%
CirrhosisDawgDeepSeaZAZDuckDennis_DeYoungCokeGreaterThanPepsichuckoregonblitzkriegDooglesGrundleStiltzkinKaepskneeBasemanYellowSnow89uteEl_KJoey 15 votes
#7 Queen
65%
CFetters_Nacho_LoverFire_Marshall_BillSwayeSoutherndawgBennyBeaverRoadDawg55Mad_SonPurpleJUWhuskytskeetYouKnowItdncdfleaTequillaBad_MotherDuckerJaWarrenJaHookerAlexisIPukeOregonGrellowLebamDawgDoog_de_JourBearsWiin 28 votes
«1

Comments

  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,856 Founders Club
    #2 Fleetwood Mac
    Not sure how this match up will play out. Seems that it could be a close one.
  • Peterman
    Peterman Member Posts: 675
    #7 Queen
    Freddie is my favorite gay of all tim
  • Dennis_DeYoung
    Dennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    #2 Fleetwood Mac
    I’m going with the Mac. Close call, though.
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,856 Founders Club
    #2 Fleetwood Mac

    I’m going with the Mac. Close call, though.

    Queen had a lot of brilliant songs no doubt BUT they never had a complete album on par with, say, Rumors or Fleetwood Mac (1975). You can't get an album like Rumors without major sloppy seconds amongst band members.
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,842 Swaye's Wigwam
    #2 Fleetwood Mac
    Pretty much everything Nicks and Buckingham wrote was aimed at the other. Call it soft or sappy or whatever if you want. I used to brush them aside as soft, sentimental rock but they meant that shit and a lot of it hits pretty hard.

    Plus they we're really good live and Buckingham was an underrated guitarist.
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,856 Founders Club
    #2 Fleetwood Mac
    chuck said:

    Pretty much everything Nicks and Buckingham wrote was aimed at the other. Call it soft or sappy or whatever if you want. I used to brush them aside as soft, sentimental rock but they meant that shit and a lot of it hits pretty hard.

    Plus they we're really good live and Buckingham was an underrated guitarist.

    I used to be a Fleetwood Mac hater because of 1992 and "Don't Stop Believing". Then I got over myself and grew to love them. Steely Dan and Fleetwood Mac are two of the bigger course corrections in my rock listening.
  • Dennis_DeYoung
    Dennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    #2 Fleetwood Mac

    I’m going with the Mac. Close call, though.

    Queen had a lot of brilliant songs no doubt BUT they never had a complete album on par with, say, Rumors or Fleetwood Mac (1975). You can't get an album like Rumors without major sloppy seconds amongst band members.
    Basically this. I am really into easy listening pop-rock. So, there’s that too.