New York Times wins the Dave Samek Profiles in Courage Award

DerekJohnson

All these years they said nothing about Weinstein. But when the tide turned and it was safe to pile on, then they began their exposes. And now their colleagues award them for their courageous work. Ridiculous and pathetic.

https://apnews.com/d3139792c89b4e06942b26d6c3c8bbe8/Times,-New-Yorker-win-Pulitzer-for-Weinstein-scandal

HardlyClothed

“When the tide turned and it was safe to pile on”

If I remember correctly it was their Weinstein story that started the me too movement.

DerekJohnson

HardlyClothed said:

“When the tide turned and it was safe to pile on”

If I remember correctly it was their Weinstein story that started the me too movement.

The groundswell was already occurring. Forty people in that industry watched Weinstein walk out of a room with a 16 year old girl and nobody stepped up and did or said anything.

2001400ex

DerekJohnson said:

HardlyClothed said:

“When the tide turned and it was safe to pile on”

If I remember correctly it was their Weinstein story that started the me too movement.

The groundswell was already occurring. Forty people in that industry watched Weinstein walk out of a room with a 16 year old girl and nobody stepped up and did or said anything.

And that was the NY times fault?

PurpleThrobber

DerekJohnson said:

HardlyClothed said:

“When the tide turned and it was safe to pile on”

If I remember correctly it was their Weinstein story that started the me too movement.

The groundswell was already occurring. Forty people in that industry watched Weinstein walk out of a room with a 16 year old girl and nobody stepped up and did or said anything.

YKW. She's probably 18 by now. Can even round up from 17 1/2.

2001400ex

PurpleThrobber said:

DerekJohnson said:

HardlyClothed said:

“When the tide turned and it was safe to pile on”

If I remember correctly it was their Weinstein story that started the me too movement.

The groundswell was already occurring. Forty people in that industry watched Weinstein walk out of a room with a 16 year old girl and nobody stepped up and did or said anything.

YKW. She's probably 18 by now. Can even round up from 17 1/2.

Look at her bush, she got hair..

BennyBeaver

DerekJohnson said:

HardlyClothed said:

“When the tide turned and it was safe to pile on”

If I remember correctly it was their Weinstein story that started the me too movement.

The groundswell was already occurring. Forty people in that industry watched Weinstein walk out of a room with a 16 year old girl and nobody stepped up and did or said anything.

That’s a fucking retarded post Derek.

What industry? The newspaper industry? Or Hollywood? Or they’re all the same to you?

Small town newspaper “writer” jealousy.

HardlyClothed

DerekJohnson said:

HardlyClothed said:

“When the tide turned and it was safe to pile on”

If I remember correctly it was their Weinstein story that started the me too movement.

The groundswell was already occurring. Forty people in that industry watched Weinstein walk out of a room with a 16 year old girl and nobody stepped up and did or said anything.

It’s disingenuous to say that the groundswell was occurring when they were the ones that started it. Then Louis CK, Charlie Rose, Matt Lauer etc.

The story wasn’t just about Weinstein’s crimes but his ability to silence accusers due to his powerful status. He hired ex-Mossad agents to prevent the victims from talking to the media. So your criticism is that the NYT didn’t get that story earlier? Ok then how about the failures of every other media outlet especially those in LA or those that cover Hollywood?

Kaepsknee

HardlyClothed said:

DerekJohnson said:

HardlyClothed said:

“When the tide turned and it was safe to pile on”

If I remember correctly it was their Weinstein story that started the me too movement.

The groundswell was already occurring. Forty people in that industry watched Weinstein walk out of a room with a 16 year old girl and nobody stepped up and did or said anything.

It’s disingenuous to say that the groundswell was occurring when they were the ones that started it. Then Louis CK, Charlie Rose, Matt Lauer etc.

The story wasn’t just about Weinstein’s crimes but his ability to silence accusers due to his powerful status. He hired ex-Mossad agents to prevent the victims from talking to the media. So your criticism is that the NYT didn’t get that story earlier? Ok then how about the failures of every other media outlet especially those in LA or those that cover Hollywood?

Sounds like you've never taken that pussy.


Because sometimes uze got tu take that pussy.

RaceBannon

NBS sat on the story which kind of blows the apologists out of the water

BennyBeaver

RaceBannon said:

NBS sat on the story which kind of blows the apologists out of the water

National Boy Stockers?

RaceBannon

And?

BennyBeaver

Thud

2001400ex

RaceBannon said:

NBS sat on the story which kind of blows the apologists out of the water

I'm socked Fox news didn't break the story earlier. I thought they were the real journalists.

Southerndawg

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

NBS sat on the story which kind of blows the apologists out of the water

I'm a loadsocked Fox news didn't break the story earlier. I thought they were the real journalists.

FTFY

Pitchfork51

Wtf is the point of being powerful if you can't use that power to fuck hot Tang and silence them afterwards


Otherwise he'd have to go the other route and not look like a disgusting piece of shit