Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

NBA Playoff Megathread

1…113114116118119…121

Comments

  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,508 Standard Supporter
    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    BleachedAnusDawg said:

    LeBron is in the top-2 discussion now. If you use the championships metric as the most important measure of GOAT you are FS. Bob Horry says hi.

    For getting swept like old dirt in the finals?
    But...but...he broke his hand....


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Gladstone
    Gladstone Member Posts: 16,425
    ahh there it is, now just throw teq of 'defending sark into year 5 ' fame and salem 'derplord' coog in here and then we can put on a festival

    what other lowest common denominator context-deprived team stats can we throw out there, boys

    at least winners win, right?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,919
    allpurpleallgold said:

    Did the Warriors really just have Steph jack up shots to win the MVP? 12-27 in a 25 point blow out? Lol. Is there anything this team does that isn’t fraudulent?

    Winners win.



    Losers pick them apart. Let’s review. A couple weeks ago, Curry was their best player and it wasn’t even close. And Durant never passes the ball and was the reason the Thunder couldn’t get over the Hump.

    Is anything you say ever right?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,919
    Gladstone said:

    ahh there it is, now just throw teq of 'defending sark into year 5 ' fame and salem 'derplord' coog in here and then we can put on a festival

    what other lowest common denominator context-deprived team stats can we throw out there, boys

    at least winners win, right?

    You sound like a Coug after AC.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,223
    Gladstone said:

    ahh there it is, now just throw teq of 'defending sark into year 5 ' fame and salem 'derplord' coog in here and then we can put on a festival

    what other lowest common denominator context-deprived team stats can we throw out there, boys

    at least winners win, right?

    I was not defending Sark in Year 5 ... but go ahead and enjoy that parade on Tuesday
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,386 Standard Supporter
    Tequilla said:

    Gladstone said:

    ahh there it is, now just throw teq of 'defending sark into year 5 ' fame and salem 'derplord' coog in here and then we can put on a festival

    what other lowest common denominator context-deprived team stats can we throw out there, boys

    at least winners win, right?

    I was not defending Sark in Year 5 ... but go ahead and enjoy that parade on Tuesday
    You did.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BaldwinIV
    BaldwinIV Member Posts: 797
    yes lebron is primarily responsible for the make up of the team

    but you cant scratch two sticks together and make gold. kyrie irving left and in return they got an average point guard, a bench player, and a complete nothing. its widely reported lebron wanted the cavs to trade their pick for deandre

    and this is all besides the point. lebron literally had one of the best seasons in history, in any context, and given what i listed many still believe he needed an excuse for getting swept in the finals lmfao

    it is literally 4 hall of famers against lebron, the magically disappearing and randomly appearing kevin love, and the nba's version of a YMCA team. why the fuck would lebron need an excuse? it's clear to virtually everyone he's the best player on the planet for simply making the finals

    some of ya'll should just admit you hate him because you're MJ fans and feel threatened
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,223
    Gladstone said:

    ahh there it is, now just throw teq of 'defending sark into year 5 ' fame and salem 'derplord' coog in here and then we can put on a festival

    what other lowest common denominator context-deprived team stats can we throw out there, boys

    at least winners win, right?

    I was not defending Sark in Year 5 ... but go ahead and enjoy that parade on Tuesday
    RoadDawg55 said:

    Tequilla said:

    Gladstone said:

    ahh there it is, now just throw teq of 'defending sark into year 5 ' fame and salem 'derplord' coog in here and then we can put on a festival

    what other lowest common denominator context-deprived team stats can we throw out there, boys

    at least winners win, right?

    I was not defending Sark in Year 5 ... but go ahead and enjoy that parade on Tuesday
    You did.
    Actually I didn’t ... I was one of the most vocal regarding firing him.

    Too many confuse what I said Sark needed to do to keep his job after Year 5 as a sign of defending him ... not even close to the same thing
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,386 Standard Supporter
    Tequilla said:

    Gladstone said:

    ahh there it is, now just throw teq of 'defending sark into year 5 ' fame and salem 'derplord' coog in here and then we can put on a festival

    what other lowest common denominator context-deprived team stats can we throw out there, boys

    at least winners win, right?

    I was not defending Sark in Year 5 ... but go ahead and enjoy that parade on Tuesday
    RoadDawg55 said:

    Tequilla said:

    Gladstone said:

    ahh there it is, now just throw teq of 'defending sark into year 5 ' fame and salem 'derplord' coog in here and then we can put on a festival

    what other lowest common denominator context-deprived team stats can we throw out there, boys

    at least winners win, right?

    I was not defending Sark in Year 5 ... but go ahead and enjoy that parade on Tuesday
    You did.
    Actually I didn’t ... I was one of the most vocal regarding firing him.

    Too many confuse what I said Sark needed to do to keep his job after Year 5 as a sign of defending him ... not even close to the same thing
    I remember you back to dawgman defending Sark. I'm sure you had some criticisms of him in your tl,dr posts, but you didn't call for him to very fired until the middle of year 5.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,223
    RoadDawg55 said:

    Tequilla said:

    Gladstone said:

    ahh there it is, now just throw teq of 'defending sark into year 5 ' fame and salem 'derplord' coog in here and then we can put on a festival

    what other lowest common denominator context-deprived team stats can we throw out there, boys

    at least winners win, right?

    I was not defending Sark in Year 5 ... but go ahead and enjoy that parade on Tuesday
    RoadDawg55 said:

    Tequilla said:

    Gladstone said:

    ahh there it is, now just throw teq of 'defending sark into year 5 ' fame and salem 'derplord' coog in here and then we can put on a festival

    what other lowest common denominator context-deprived team stats can we throw out there, boys

    at least winners win, right?

    I was not defending Sark in Year 5 ... but go ahead and enjoy that parade on Tuesday
    You did.
    Actually I didn’t ... I was one of the most vocal regarding firing him.

    Too many confuse what I said Sark needed to do to keep his job after Year 5 as a sign of defending him ... not even close to the same thing
    I remember you back to dawgman defending Sark. I'm sure you had some criticisms of him in your tl,dr posts, but you didn't call for him to very fired until the middle of year 5.
    I was very critical of him after Year 3 and then he fired his defensive staff to buy himself more time

    After Pete kicked his ass in Vegas it was fairly clear that he wasn’t the right coach to take UW to the next level ... that being said really hard for an AD to fire him at that point

    Again, I think where you (and others) confuse what I say is that I don’t just randomly half ass call for people to be fired. I tend to treat those discussions as part of a resume and body of work.

    What we will never know is whether Sark would have got fired after Year 5 (he should have) ... so praise be to Pat Haden
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter