'Crock of Shit' - Classic Confirmation Bias

dflea

pawz said:

dflea said:

RaceBannon said:

Salient points

The Shah was ruthless too. Turns out he had a reason to be. Now we have ruthless mullahs that hate us

I thought we agreed that the devil Saddam was better than the devils that replaced him but now we want to do it again?

pawz never agreed with that. His purple finger sig photo confirmed it. There's so much freedom in Iraq without Saddam that it makes the whole 20 year shit show worthwhile.

I'm man enough to admit when I was wrong. I was wrong about Iraq, and I'm not buying the dog-and-pony show with Syria now.

Any action in that whole fucking region is highly suspect to me.

pawz

More confirmation bias.

creepycoug

RaceBannon said:

Salient points

The Shah was ruthless too. Turns out he had a reason to be. Now we have ruthless mullahs that hate us

I thought we agreed that the devil Saddam was better than the devils that replaced him but now we want to do it again?

Rinse and repeat. We seem to struggle with this particular lesson. OBK has a good poast in this a while back. There are some regions of the globe that are not ready to live the way we live. Unevolved if you will. While they are, they seem to be most stable with an iron fisted leader - one who organically rose to power from within their society - in charge.

dnc

https://twitter.com/EricTheRed79/status/985854662506098689