Here's the piece by JPS from the fake news NYT if anyone is interested in reading.
I for one am not in favoring of removing it from the Constitution, but I do agree with JPS on the history of how it was interpreted for the first 200 years. For over 200 years after the adoption of the Second Amendment, it was uniformly understood as not placing any limit on either federal or state authority to enact gun control legislation. In 1939 the Supreme Court unanimously held that Congress could prohibit the possession of a sawed-off shotgun because that weapon had no reasonable relation to the preservation or efficiency of a “well regulated militia.”
And yet the military uses lots of sawed off shotguns.
I thought they were all 18" to 20" barrels. That's a short barrel shotgun, not a sawed off one. My Remington 870 Tactical has an 18" barrel and was perfectly legal to buy.
They use quite a few shorty guns mounted under barrel on the M4 which itself is a short barreled rifle under current law.
Comments
Texas voters can't get rid of abortion by a vote. The Supremes look poorly upon some restrictions that get voted in or passed by a legislature
Thankfully our founding mothers knew someday we would be fucking stupid enough to give up all our freedoms so they made it really hard to do.
Booze got an amendment passed and then unpassed over about 15 years. Because booze is important.