Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Stanford's success destroys any Doog argument.

Gladstone
Gladstone Member Posts: 16,425
edited November 2013 in Hardcore Husky Board
Literally every fucking one. Yet these mental midgets continually roll out the same excuses. Just reply 'Stanford' and walk away. I would kill to have had a run like they've had the past few years:

12-1 Orange Bowl
11-2 Fiesta Bowl
12-2 Rose Bowl

All built on tough-as-nails physicality, power run game, and fundamentals. The blueprint for success hasn't changed. Run the ball. Stop the run. Tackle. Wear other teams out.

Fuck. The nerdy school on the Farm has become UW under Don James, while we drown in fat frat boy mediocrity and run a pussy offense and don't do anything particularly well.. Fuck this administration. Fuck this staff. Fuck this fanbase.

Oh and before anyone coy mentions 0-12, Stanford's 1-11 2006 team was far worse than our 2008 team. Guess who their only win was that year? Against a heartless suddenly seniored UW squad.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«13

Comments

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    You'd like to think that but Doogs bring up how you can't blame a kid for ever going to Stanford.

    Doogs always find a way to excuse shitty coaching at UW
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Meek
    Meek Member Posts: 7,031
    I'm a pathetic Husky fan and my wife is a hardcore Cal Bear yet... we both love football and despite the emotional pain of it, we actually have Stanford season tickets because they play the kind of football we like to watch.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited November 2013
    This existence of this loathed rival in the conference is a good thing. The conference can't make a fundamental change to "big boy football" any more than the SEC make a fundamental change to "high octane smoke and mirrors football." Not without a full decade or more to work with. We're stuck with what we have built and now we have to go back to the lab like good chemists and tweak it until we find a way to make it work against those kind of teams. Not sure what the answer is exactly, but pretty sure it involves the following universal truth: big fast guys + field goals > small fast guys that go for it on every 4th down inside enemy territory without consideration for who the enemy is.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Gladstone
    Gladstone Member Posts: 16,425
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    You'd like to think that but Doogs bring up how you can't blame a kid for ever going to Stanford.

    Doogs always find a way to excuse shitty coaching at UW

    For a thousand years people always said you couldn't recruit elite kids to Stanford because (A) admissions and (B) the type of kids who wanted to go to Stanford were soft and finesse.

    Now the script has been completely flipped and admissions are used by doogs in favor of Stanford? It should be 1000x easier for UW-type kids to play mean and nasty than Stanford-type kids. Of course, coaching is EVERYTHING and that salient point escapes every doog's stupid head.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    Meek said:

    I'm a pathetic Husky fan and my wife is a hardcore Cal Bear yet...

    I don't think a hardcore Cal bear fan could stomach attending so many Stanford games. Then again Cal sucks major ass, so perhaps this is possible.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Your_Mom
    Your_Mom Member Posts: 393
    I'm glad to see that some of you guys that were humping Oregon's leg, are finally humping Stanford's leg... because now you get what some of us have been getting for a while... Stanford plays real football... Oregon plays a blurgimmick.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,573
    edited November 2013
    Your_Mom said:

    I'm glad to see that some of you guys that were humping Oregon's leg, are finally humping Stanford's leg... because now you get what some of us have been getting for a while... Stanford plays real football... Oregon plays a blurgimmick.

    You have to be the biggest dumbfuck I have ever encountered on a message board. Of course you have to have better guys upfront, but that doesn't mean you have to play a pro-style offense with those linemen. Stanford's O-line could play spread if Shaw wanted to, but he doesn't have the personnel on the skill positions to run it well. So he packs everyone inside and runs at you. You put Oregon's skill positions and spread offense with Stanford's offensive front, you have an unstoppable force. Calling Oregon's offense a gimmick is why idiots like you shouldn't procreate. You could actually call Stanford's offense a gimmick, considering more offenses now run spread systems compared to pro-style systems.

    Also, what does Oregon's spread offense have anything to do with their undersized defensive front? Morons like you make this world dumber. Why your parents actually conceived you is beyond me.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Your_Mom
    Your_Mom Member Posts: 393
    edited November 2013
    You sound angry.



    Cry me a river.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,543 Swaye's Wigwam
    It does destroy the doog myths, but I have seen Fetters defend it by saying Stanford is not like any other school, so they don't count.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,573
    Your_Mom said:

    You sound angry.



    Cry me a river.

    If you read the end, more perplexed than angry.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter