Home› Tug Tavern

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

At least Trump has confirmation the NDA is invalid

2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
in Tug Tavern
Because Fox and friends.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/former-trump-attorney-stuns-apos-221023844.html
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    PurpleThrobber said:

    This isn't hush money for some boss who went Weinstein and threatened women's livelihood or career.

    It's cash paid to a hooker to STFU. There's no #metoo bullshit here. SHE'S A HOOKER.

    Any red-blooded American male knows this is thanks for the good time, now go back to making porn movie money.

    Trump will gain voters from this.





    Well I'd say she's more of a porn star than a hooker. Democrats are angling at an election violation.

    That being said, he should have kept the $130k and just come out with it and bragged about it. As you said, probably a net gain in voters.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pawzpawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 20,928 Founders Club
    edited March 2018
    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    This isn't hush money for some boss who went Weinstein and threatened women's livelihood or career.

    It's cash paid to a hooker to STFU. There's no #metoo bullshit here. SHE'S A HOOKER.

    Any red-blooded American male knows this is thanks for the good time, now go back to making porn movie money.

    Trump will gain voters from this.





    Well I'd say she's more of a porn star than a hooker. Democrats are angling at an election violation.

    That being said, he should have kept the $130k and just come out with it and bragged about it. As you said, probably a net gain in voters.
    Of course you would. You're a dumb mother fucker.

    SHE GOT PAID FOR SEX. Textbook definition of a hooker.



    NTTIAWWT
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    This isn't hush money for some boss who went Weinstein and threatened women's livelihood or career.

    It's cash paid to a hooker to STFU. There's no #metoo bullshit here. SHE'S A HOOKER.

    Any red-blooded American male knows this is thanks for the good time, now go back to making porn movie money.

    Trump will gain voters from this.





    Well I'd say she's more of a porn star than a hooker. Democrats are angling at an election violation.

    That being said, he should have kept the $130k and just come out with it and bragged about it. As you said, probably a net gain in voters.
    Of course you would. You're a dumb mother fucker.

    SHE GOT PAID FOR SEX. Textbook definition of a hooker.



    NTTIAWWT
    She got paid after sex to shut the fuck up.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    PurpleThrobber said:

    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    This isn't hush money for some boss who went Weinstein and threatened women's livelihood or career.

    It's cash paid to a hooker to STFU. There's no #metoo bullshit here. SHE'S A HOOKER.

    Any red-blooded American male knows this is thanks for the good time, now go back to making porn movie money.

    Trump will gain voters from this.





    Well I'd say she's more of a porn star than a hooker. Democrats are angling at an election violation.

    That being said, he should have kept the $130k and just come out with it and bragged about it. As you said, probably a net gain in voters.
    Of course you would. You're a dumb mother fucker.

    SHE GOT PAID FOR SEX. Textbook definition of a hooker.



    NTTIAWWT
    She got paid after sex to shut the fuck up.
    You never pay the hooker BEFORE the blow job.

    That's just common knowledge.

    True. But I don't think they keep an IOU for 10 years either.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,156 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    This isn't hush money for some boss who went Weinstein and threatened women's livelihood or career.

    It's cash paid to a hooker to STFU. There's no #metoo bullshit here. SHE'S A HOOKER.

    Any red-blooded American male knows this is thanks for the good time, now go back to making porn movie money.

    Trump will gain voters from this.





    Well I'd say she's more of a porn star than a hooker. Democrats are angling at an election violation.

    That being said, he should have kept the $130k and just come out with it and bragged about it. As you said, probably a net gain in voters.
    Of course you would. You're a dumb mother fucker.

    SHE GOT PAID FOR SEX. Textbook definition of a hooker.



    NTTIAWWT
    She got paid after sex to shut the fuck up.
    You never pay the hooker BEFORE the blow job.

    That's just common knowledge.

    True. But I don't think they keep an IOU for 10 years either.
    There may have been some dispute as to too much teeth, spitting instead of swallowing, was it within the scope of work, any change orders....lots of considerations before the final transaction amount can possibly be determined. These things sometimes drag on years.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,964 Standard Supporter
    Most contracts are legally enforceable against the signor of the contract, regardless whether the other party signed it, or not. It doesn't matter if the party who wrote it, or their attorneys, signed it, particularly in a settlement scenario. If she agreed and then breeched, Trump gets to fuck her again. And take back his money. And she'll pay his attorney fees.

    Disclaimer: I'm not an attorney on TV. But I often pretend I have one in my pants.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    TurdBuffer said:

    Most contracts are legally enforceable against the signor of the contract, regardless whether the other party signed it, or not. It doesn't matter if the party who wrote it, or their attorneys, signed it, particularly in a settlement scenario. If she agreed and then breeched, Trump gets to fuck her again. And take back his money. And she'll pay his attorney fees.

    Disclaimer: I'm not an attorney on TV. But I often pretend I have one in my pants.

    So she’ll give back the $130k and pay attorneys fees, while making millions selling the story to the masses.

    Sounds like the “winning” logic of a trumpanzee.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,156 Standard Supporter
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    TurdBuffer said:

    Most contracts are legally enforceable against the signor of the contract, regardless whether the other party signed it, or not. It doesn't matter if the party who wrote it, or their attorneys, signed it, particularly in a settlement scenario. If she agreed and then breeched, Trump gets to fuck her again. And take back his money. And she'll pay his attorney fees.

    Disclaimer: I'm not an attorney on TV. But I often pretend I have one in my pants.

    So she’ll give back the $130k and pay attorneys fees, while making millions selling the story to the masses.

    Sounds like the “winning” logic of a trumpanzee.
    Trump's guys are cutting royalty agreements with Stormy's producers right now. He'll get a percentage of any look-alike porn in which she participates.

    Win win.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,843 Standard Supporter
    PurpleThrobber said:

    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    This isn't hush money for some boss who went Weinstein and threatened women's livelihood or career.

    It's cash paid to a hooker to STFU. There's no #metoo bullshit here. SHE'S A HOOKER.

    Any red-blooded American male knows this is thanks for the good time, now go back to making porn movie money.

    Trump will gain voters from this.





    Well I'd say she's more of a porn star than a hooker. Democrats are angling at an election violation.

    That being said, he should have kept the $130k and just come out with it and bragged about it. As you said, probably a net gain in voters.
    Of course you would. You're a dumb mother fucker.

    SHE GOT PAID FOR SEX. Textbook definition of a hooker.



    NTTIAWWT
    She got paid after sex to shut the fuck up.
    You never pay the hooker BEFORE the blow job.

    That's just common knowledge.

    Hondo doesn't pay!


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,964 Standard Supporter
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    TurdBuffer said:

    Most contracts are legally enforceable against the signor of the contract, regardless whether the other party signed it, or not. It doesn't matter if the party who wrote it, or their attorneys, signed it, particularly in a settlement scenario. If she agreed and then breeched, Trump gets to fuck her again. And take back his money. And she'll pay his attorney fees.

    Disclaimer: I'm not an attorney on TV. But I often pretend I have one in my pants.

    So she’ll give back the $130k and pay attorneys fees, while making millions selling the story to the masses.

    Sounds like the “winning” logic of a trumpanzee.
    No, you dumb fuck. I told you to stop playing with grown up tools for a reason. Trump could sue her for every last penny she earns by breeching the contract. Go back to watching the View, you dumb cunt.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    TurdBuffer said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    TurdBuffer said:

    Most contracts are legally enforceable against the signor of the contract, regardless whether the other party signed it, or not. It doesn't matter if the party who wrote it, or their attorneys, signed it, particularly in a settlement scenario. If she agreed and then breeched, Trump gets to fuck her again. And take back his money. And she'll pay his attorney fees.

    Disclaimer: I'm not an attorney on TV. But I often pretend I have one in my pants.

    So she’ll give back the $130k and pay attorneys fees, while making millions selling the story to the masses.

    Sounds like the “winning” logic of a trumpanzee.
    No, you dumb fuck. I told you to stop playing with grown up tools for a reason. Trump could sue her for every last penny she earns by breeching the contract. Go back to watching the View, you dumb cunt.
    No, he couldn’t. At all. You sound tough though. And stupid. So you’ve got that going for you.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,964 Standard Supporter
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    TurdBuffer said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    TurdBuffer said:

    Most contracts are legally enforceable against the signor of the contract, regardless whether the other party signed it, or not. It doesn't matter if the party who wrote it, or their attorneys, signed it, particularly in a settlement scenario. If she agreed and then breeched, Trump gets to fuck her again. And take back his money. And she'll pay his attorney fees.

    Disclaimer: I'm not an attorney on TV. But I often pretend I have one in my pants.

    So she’ll give back the $130k and pay attorneys fees, while making millions selling the story to the masses.

    Sounds like the “winning” logic of a trumpanzee.
    No, you dumb fuck. I told you to stop playing with grown up tools for a reason. Trump could sue her for every last penny she earns by breeching the contract. Go back to watching the View, you dumb cunt.
    No, he couldn’t. At all. You sound tough though. And stupid. So you’ve got that going for you.
    Fuck you're even dumber than I thought, and that's really saying something.

    Per the NDA terms, she owes a cool 1 million bucks, per instance of breach. And she's already breached the contract several times. Her lawsuit to invalidate the NDA is her last strategic gasp effort to avoid bankruptcy after shooting her mouth off and making herself liable to the tune of several million bucks. And that's only the beginning.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    TurdBuffer said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    TurdBuffer said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    TurdBuffer said:

    Most contracts are legally enforceable against the signor of the contract, regardless whether the other party signed it, or not. It doesn't matter if the party who wrote it, or their attorneys, signed it, particularly in a settlement scenario. If she agreed and then breeched, Trump gets to fuck her again. And take back his money. And she'll pay his attorney fees.

    Disclaimer: I'm not an attorney on TV. But I often pretend I have one in my pants.

    So she’ll give back the $130k and pay attorneys fees, while making millions selling the story to the masses.

    Sounds like the “winning” logic of a trumpanzee.
    No, you dumb fuck. I told you to stop playing with grown up tools for a reason. Trump could sue her for every last penny she earns by breeching the contract. Go back to watching the View, you dumb cunt.
    No, he couldn’t. At all. You sound tough though. And stupid. So you’ve got that going for you.
    Fuck you're even dumber than I thought, and that's really saying something.

    Per the NDA terms, she owes a cool 1 million bucks, per instance of breach. And she's already breached the contract several times. Her lawsuit to invalidate the NDA is her last strategic gasp effort to avoid bankruptcy after shooting her mouth off and making herself liable to the tune of several million bucks. And that's only the beginning.
    Only the beginning. I agree with that. Let’s all watch the potus try to enforce an Nda against a porn star, shall we. Lipo, right?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,964 Standard Supporter
    https://seattletimes.com/nation-world/experts-porn-stars-case-against-trump-is-a-weak-one/ Bump
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,487 Founders Club
    PurpleThrobber said:

    Need a ruling from @Swaye - is Stormy offering Trump the $130K back a form of Indian giving?

    Not sure. Let me give her some Indian and I'll report back.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnctopdawgnc Member Posts: 7,838
    Jesus Christ.

    Russia!!!!

    Fuck that didn't work.

    Hooker!!!!!

    Worked so well with Bill Clinton ...


    Sex scandals are so Gary Hart.

    Give me something good.

    Like photos of Trump fucking Hillary ... that's a scandal.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.