Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

YouTube and Politics

2»

Comments

  • pawzpawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,156 Founders Club

    Milo, Mike Adams and Michael Yon have all been censored or shut down by Youtube, Facebook and Twitter

    When are you going to shutdown #aclockworkshill?
  • pawzpawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,156 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    Milo, Mike Adams and Michael Yon have all been censored or shut down by Youtube, Facebook and Twitter

    Care to post the link of what they did to be censored? Would be great context.
    Fuck the fuck off. You have a long history of denying the proof in front of your face.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    Milo, Mike Adams and Michael Yon have all been censored or shut down by Youtube, Facebook and Twitter

    Care to post the link of what they did to be censored? Would be great context.
    Fuck the fuck off. You have a long history of denying the proof in front of your face.
    You have a long history of never posting evidence of your stupid ass assertions.
  • pawzpawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,156 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    Milo, Mike Adams and Michael Yon have all been censored or shut down by Youtube, Facebook and Twitter

    Care to post the link of what they did to be censored? Would be great context.
    Fuck the fuck off. You have a long history of denying the proof in front of your face.
    You have a long history of never posting evidence of your stupid ass assertions.
    No.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    Dude61 said:

    2001400ex said:
    By demonetizing the channel, Youtube is, in effect. deleting it. This is censorship.

    They deleted a couple obvious fake news pieces being posted as real news. Clearly you support fake news. Dumbfuck.

    No they didn't you lying motherfucker. We know Alex Jones is your #1 enemy since he was the one to first out Herr Hillary's health problems during the election. They cancelled the guy's entire channel that has a massive following because it's 'off-script'.

    He's not the only one either. And they've demonetized a ton of channels, videos off-script with weak excuses.

    The same chicken-shit excuses you peddle.




    Since you obviously don't support free speech, maybe you should just shut the fuck up for once.


    #aclockworkshill
    Your support of free speech extends to the liberal media too, right?

    Free speech is a non-partisan issue.

    Which is the point that went whizzing past your pea-brain.



    GFY, shill.

    Then why don't you scream at Trump when he screams about fake news?

    Shill.
    When he's mistaken, I say so.

    So far he hasn't been wrong about you or your handlers, shill.
    Lol yes I remember when you called bullshit on Trump claiming 3 to 5 million illegals voting. Among a bunch of other bullshit he's lied about.
    Prove they didn't.

    Dems have long owned the monopoly stuffing the ballot box. The allegation certainly isn't a stretch.

    Just a threat to your handlers, shill.
    You are some kind of special stupid.
  • pawzpawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,156 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    Dude61 said:

    2001400ex said:
    By demonetizing the channel, Youtube is, in effect. deleting it. This is censorship.

    They deleted a couple obvious fake news pieces being posted as real news. Clearly you support fake news. Dumbfuck.

    No they didn't you lying motherfucker. We know Alex Jones is your #1 enemy since he was the one to first out Herr Hillary's health problems during the election. They cancelled the guy's entire channel that has a massive following because it's 'off-script'.

    He's not the only one either. And they've demonetized a ton of channels, videos off-script with weak excuses.

    The same chicken-shit excuses you peddle.




    Since you obviously don't support free speech, maybe you should just shut the fuck up for once.


    #aclockworkshill
    Your support of free speech extends to the liberal media too, right?

    Free speech is a non-partisan issue.

    Which is the point that went whizzing past your pea-brain.



    GFY, shill.

    Then why don't you scream at Trump when he screams about fake news?

    Shill.
    When he's mistaken, I say so.

    So far he hasn't been wrong about you or your handlers, shill.
    Lol yes I remember when you called bullshit on Trump claiming 3 to 5 million illegals voting. Among a bunch of other bullshit he's lied about.
    Prove they didn't.

    Dems have long owned the monopoly stuffing the ballot box. The allegation certainly isn't a stretch.

    Just a threat to your handlers, shill.
    You are some kind of special stupid.
    Coming from you, that's a compliment.

    Thank you, shill.
  • pawzpawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,156 Founders Club
    pawz said:

    When is it OK for YouTube to sensor videos due to political persuasions?

    Where is the threshold between 'private company' as such and being a fundamental/critical part of the public domain?



    By taking sides, do they risk their immunity and become legally responsible for user content?


    Bump.

    The questions are worth discussing, sans highjack shill
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    When is it OK for YouTube to sensor videos due to political persuasions?

    Where is the threshold between 'private company' as such and being a fundamental/critical part of the public domain?



    By taking sides, do they risk their immunity and become legally responsible for user content?


    Bump.

    The questions are worth discussing, sans highjack shill
    Funny you don't ask the same about Rush Limbaugh or Fox news.
  • pawzpawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,156 Founders Club
    edited March 2018
    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    When is it OK for YouTube to sensor videos due to political persuasions?

    Where is the threshold between 'private company' as such and being a fundamental/critical part of the public domain?



    By taking sides, do they risk their immunity and become legally responsible for user content?


    Bump.

    The questions are worth discussing, sans highjack shill
    Funny you don't ask the same about Rush Limbaugh or Fox news.
    They aren't pretending to be impartial, shill.

    Do try to stay on topic.
  • dfleadflea Member Posts: 7,236
    Why does youtube have to be impartial or even pretend to be? Government censorship bothers me - like when a university tries to disallow some dipshit the opportunity to speak if their words are scary and make you want to shale and vomit.

    I don't think google or youtube are obliged to be non-partisan, though. They aren't government agencies and contrary to obk's wailing, they aren't monopolies. either, IMO. You should probably send them a strongly worded email and let them know what cunts they are.



  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,886
    AIDS won pulling away in this one.
Sign In or Register to comment.