This is not a joke. Sagarin has us at #10 on USA Today's Computer ranking. Did Sark's parents change the name from Sagarin? usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/sagarin/
I like to rank a team higher than a team that just beat them head to head like a run away slave...that's what I like to do. Last time I checked, Stanford is better than Oregon for second straight year
I like to rank a team higher than a team that just beat them head to head like a run away slave...that's what I like to do. Last time I checked, Stanford is better than Oregon for second straight year
Yeah... you don't understand how this system works. The numbers are what the numbers are. They may be wrong but it isn't a "like" to do anything.
Also, what is a better record - undefeated other than a loss to Utah or undefeated other than a loss to Stanford?
Back on topic here, we apparently lost to #4,5,9... I wonder how different things would be if the refs hadn't jobbed Wisconsin, thus dropping ASU and then us.
The weirdest thing of all here is that the predictor has us at 9th... typically we fail there and are pulled up by the "score differential is irrelevant" pure elo
NO RESPECT! LA-Lafayette, received more votes than the doogs in the coaches poll. Obviously they don't read USA Today. Somebody needs to tell the coaches that USA Today is who pays them the big money to vote.
"The Huskies are once again left out of the top 25 despite a smattering of objective assessments that suggest that UW may be the most under-ranked team in the nation."
We had a very close loss to Stanford and a loss to Oregon which was the best against them by far until Stanford beat them. Our wins against Boise and Arizona score high because Arizona is 24 and Boise 38. ASU is our only bad game.
So in terms of points we are potentially 9th but in winning/losing only 30th.
We had a very close loss to Stanford and a loss to Oregon which was the best against them by far until Stanford beat them. Our wins against Boise and Arizona score high because Arizona is 24 and Boise 38. ASU is our only bad game.
So in terms of points we are potentially 9th but in winning/losing only 30th.
Apparently Sagarin thinks UW gets to play all its games at home or something.
Comments
WOOF!
Could be an epic we for northwestfootballfucktards.
Also, what is a better record - undefeated other than a loss to Utah or undefeated other than a loss to Stanford?
Back on topic here, we apparently lost to #4,5,9... I wonder how different things would be if the refs hadn't jobbed Wisconsin, thus dropping ASU and then us.
The weirdest thing of all here is that the predictor has us at 9th... typically we fail there and are pulled up by the "score differential is irrelevant" pure elo
The Doogpound always brings up these worthless, abstract rankings, grasping @ any straw they can to make 7WS look better. From today's article http://www.uwdawgpound.com/2013/11/11/5090366/what-the-ruff-week-12-cfb-rankings-updates, they write:
"The Huskies are once again left out of the top 25 despite a smattering of objective assessments that suggest that UW may be the most under-ranked team in the nation."
Give me a fucking break.
We had a very close loss to Stanford and a loss to Oregon which was the best against them by far until Stanford beat them. Our wins against Boise and Arizona score high because Arizona is 24 and Boise 38. ASU is our only bad game.
So in terms of points we are potentially 9th but in winning/losing only 30th.
lol