Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

J’Raan Brooks

24

Comments

  • Edwin_Bambino
    Edwin_Bambino Member Posts: 2,944
    He’s committed to Lehigh, if that’s his best offer right now we don’t want him.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FreeChavez
    FreeChavez Member Posts: 3,223
    Edwin_Bambino said:

    He’s committed to Lehigh, if that’s his best offer right now we don’t want him.

    For the most part, that is what got romar in trouble. It wasn't his top tier 1-2 players, it was the other 3 in the class that weren't pac12 players.

    Until hop proves he's peterson and can mold lesser players to be very good i'd trust who's recruiting you as a barometer on future success.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    Edwin_Bambino said:

    He’s committed to Lehigh, if that’s his best offer right now we don’t want him.

    All I know is this team has jack shit for a front court. J'Raan Brooks isn't gonna be a post presence in the Pac-12. HTH
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Neighbor2972
    Neighbor2972 Member Posts: 4,334
    Since it looks like we're getting him, here's some highlights. As far as AAU videos go, this one's pretty good.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3lQF4pX-3A
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • huskyhooligan
    huskyhooligan Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 6,029 Swaye's Wigwam
    Honestly not a fan. I've been wrong before. I'll point out that not all players are going to contribute on a 13 man roster soooo, why not? Anyone know if Ed Chang is going to be eligible?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Rapeculturedawg
    Rapeculturedawg Member Posts: 901
    huskyhooligan said:

    Honestly not a fan. I've been wrong before. I'll point out that not all players are going to contribute on a 13 man roster soooo, why not? Anyone know if Ed Chang is going to be eligible?

    Ed chang is likely reclassifying to 2019
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • backthepack
    backthepack Member Posts: 19,942
    You guys are dumb he's a stretch 4 that can play down low and defend about as well as Dickerson. He's around Dickerson's size and is a lot more fluid athletically coming out. Not nearly as strong. He's footwork is decent down low. I see him more in the Bennie Boatwright mold a more perimeter oriented player and that plays to the new freedom of movement rules. He's good and will be good in college.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • backthepack
    backthepack Member Posts: 19,942
    He's a player you can win a national championship with if you properly develop him over 4 years. He'll contribute more than Hameir Wright contributed this year. I think Ham's ceiling is a lot higher in the zone though.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    I'm not saying don't take him, he's a good player. But stretch 4/SF/non PGs are a dime a dozen. We need a real PG and some post presence. Brooks is Darnell Gant all over again. I don't mean that as an insult. I liked Gant. He knew his role and he played it well. He's not a can't miss prospect though.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,615
    backthepack said:

    You guys are dumb he's a stretch 4 that can play down low and defend about as well as Dickerson. He's around Dickerson's size and is a lot more fluid athletically coming out. Not nearly as strong. He's footwork is decent down low. I see him more in the Bennie Boatwright mold a more perimeter oriented player and that plays to the new freedom of movement rules. He's good and will be good in college.

    I'm hearing that if his grandma visits, it's a guarantee that he'll be good
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter