Adidas is pitching UW today
Comments
-
Pix of the D?creepycoug said:
I know that guy! I actually do! His D went to school with one of mine. Holy shit.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Glad you got a pic in with your lover. You must be really happy. I’d fuck you both. Hard.USMChawk said:
Sure.UWhuskytskeet said:
Pics.USMChawk said:
This is true. I had a $7.00 Champion sweatshirt, from the early 90’s, that I wore when I was leaving the gym or doing yard work; it’s pretty ratty. My 16 year old daughter discovered it in an old gym bag and now wears it nonstop. It’s amazing how many compliments her friends give her.Bread said:Just dropped by my local middle school. Champion is the hot brand with the next generation. If we want to be a power house in the 2020s we better switch to Champion.
Pretty smile! -
Given the usual stupidity by many on this board, you never knowcreepycoug said:
There's a lot of wet water in this poast.Tequilla said:
I guarantee that there was a RFP sent to both Nike and AdidasBennyBeaver said:
Ageerd. Overpaying is always a great business strat.BleachedAnusDawg said:
TCU MBA analysis.Tequilla said:
Given that Nike didn’t make a realistic offer outside of re-upping at essentially the existing terms, Adidas COULD have gotten away with a slightly less attractive offer than what they made.Tequilla said:I’ve always tended to like Adidas products a little better ... although Nike generally owns the basketball shoe market.
Personally, I’d like to see us disassociate with Nike purely because of the Knight/Oregon relationship. Both Nike/Adidas are HQ’ed in Portland and I could see a deal with UW being a strategic priority for Adidas.
It’s very clear to me that Adidas made this deal a very strategic priority for them in the NW ... strong business done there
I also guarantee that Adidas has a strong plan to monetize their investment in UW ... just like Nike’s bid was consistent with their plan to monetize
Adidas is more than willing to spend more money to make more money ... and that’s not counting the strategic implications of the deal for both sides -
Since Adidas has dropped some payroll in the Bball thingy.... sure. They have some loose change to swing to you Mutts.Tequilla said:
I guarantee that there was a RFP sent to both Nike and AdidasBennyBeaver said:
Ageerd. Overpaying is always a great business strat.BleachedAnusDawg said:
TCU MBA analysis.Tequilla said:
Given that Nike didn’t make a realistic offer outside of re-upping at essentially the existing terms, Adidas COULD have gotten away with a slightly less attractive offer than what they made.Tequilla said:I’ve always tended to like Adidas products a little better ... although Nike generally owns the basketball shoe market.
Personally, I’d like to see us disassociate with Nike purely because of the Knight/Oregon relationship. Both Nike/Adidas are HQ’ed in Portland and I could see a deal with UW being a strategic priority for Adidas.
It’s very clear to me that Adidas made this deal a very strategic priority for them in the NW ... strong business done there
I also guarantee that Adidas has a strong plan to monetize their investment in UW ... just like Nike’s bid was consistent with their plan to monetize
Adidas is more than willing to spend more money to make more money ... and that’s not counting the strategic implications of the deal for both sides -
HIV is strong in this thread
