Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

It is all coming together (an evidence-based approach to dooging hard)

What happens when you take a head coach who is an ELITE evaluator and developer of talent and give him access to a reasonable helping of top tier talent annually? We are about to find out.

Despite the FS takes on Petersen as a coach and recruiter that were being propagated by Griswold and his merry band of retards, there was ample evidence that Petersen was in rarefied air as an evluator and developer of talent before he even set foot on campus at UW.

The 2009-2011 Boise State teams are three of the top 4 Sagarin rating teams from outside the Power 5 conferences of all time. Focusing on just the 2010 team, which Sagarin rates as the best non-Power 5 team ever, the four recruiting cycles leading up to that season had BSU ranked #63,#87, #69, & #110 nationally, per 24/7 Sports composite. Over that period, BSU signed 75 recruits, of which 46 were 3-star ranked. The rest were 2-star or unranked.

Yet the 2010 BSU squad finished #6 in the Sagarin rankings and #4 in Sagarin's "pure points" Predictor ranking. It also finished #9 in the AP and #7 in the Coaches' Poll.

Of the players on the roster during that season, 11 were selected in the NFL draft (including four who were selected in the top 3 rounds),17 went on to appear on an NFL roster, and 10 were on NFL rosters in at least four separate seasons.

Looking beyond just the 2010 team, Petersen's teams produced NFL draft picks at a rate that was far in excess of what one would expect based on recruiting rankings.

Looking only at players that were recruited during Petersen's tenure as the head coach and spent the majority of their careers with Petersen leading the program, there were 14 draft picks, including 8 in the top three rounds. Of them, only a single player (a JC recruit) was ranked 4-stars or above. Half were ranked as 2-stars, or unranked.



The odds of this being some kind of random chance event are essentially zero.

More recently, the 2016 and 2017 Washington teams have massively overachieved compared to the talent (on paper) on the teams. Based on the 247 Composite rankings for the talent on hand, the Huskies have been essentially in line with the Power 5 average, yet Petersen has a 22-5 record overall (15-3 in P12 play) for the past two seasons, with a CFB Playoff appearance in '16.

Sure, the Pac-12 has been dreck during that period (especially in 2017) and we are all chapped by each and every one of those losses, but that is still a record of over-achievement vs. "on paper" talent that is pretty extraordinary.

But here is the best part...

After a few struggles during the 2015 and 2016 recruiting cycles (not to mention a difficult transition class in 2014), Petersen appears to be figuring this recruiting shit out:



We all are waiting on pins and needles to see if Petersen can pull off the incredible coup of closing on Tuli and Martin, but whether that happens or not, things are coming together incredibly well in a big picture sense already.

TL:DR:




Comments

  • jhfstyle24jhfstyle24 Member Posts: 3,255
    Assuming that recruit evaluations are equal, the standard deviations on all those guys being drafted is crazy high.

    If he could somehow do that with only 4 and 5 star guys, which is basically impossible assuming the ratings are accurate, UW would win every year barring disaster.

    Just a thought.
  • FremontTrollFremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744
    The best part is you posted similar analysis of CP's Boise tenure at the time in 2014 on dm.c along with the prediction that CP would obviously recruit at a higher level at UW but also would continue to outperform those rankings through superior development.

    And now it's really happening.


    That was at a time when a lot of dumbfucks were arguing CP was Hawkins/Koetter redux and one special man child was continually emphasizing that CP wasn't in the WAC anymore!
  • Captain_InsanoCaptain_Insano Member Posts: 156
    But can we beat Auburn?
  • doogiedoogie Member Posts: 15,072
    So, You’re saying Peterman ain’t in the Mountain West anymore and needs to recruit like it?
  • SarkFanSixtyNineSarkFanSixtyNine Member Posts: 369
    Peterman is the best coach in college football and it's not close. Everyone else in the Pac-12 will be a joke for the foreseeable future. If he can get Auburn and Michigan and Ohio State off the schedule he will go undefeated every year. Why the hell are those teams on the schedule?
  • WilburHooksHandsWilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,803
    edited February 2018

    But can we beat Auburn?

  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,998 Founders Club

    But can we beat Auburn?

    He looks like the shitty smart ass son of the guy who runs gambling in the county and has the sheriffs on the payroll so little shit can do whatever he wants and laugh in your face and if you smash it in you die

    But you think it is worth it
  • FremontTrollFremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744

    Assuming that recruit evaluations are equal, the standard deviations on all those guys being drafted is crazy high.

    If he could somehow do that with only 4 and 5 star guys, which is basically impossible assuming the ratings are accurate, UW would win every year barring disaster.

    Just a thought.

    Easier to exceed mediocre expectations than high expectations but yeah...if CP gets to the point of signing perennial top 10 classes we might not become Bama but at the least we wouldn't be Texas.
  • AIRWOLFAIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840

    Assuming that recruit evaluations are equal, the standard deviations on all those guys being drafted is crazy high.

    If he could somehow do that with only 4 and 5 star guys, which is basically impossible assuming the ratings are accurate, UW would win every year barring disaster.

    Just a thought.

    Easier to exceed mediocre expectations than high expectations but yeah...if CP gets to the point of signing perennial top 10 classes we might not become Bama but at the least we wouldn't be Texas.
    Mack Brown is the anti-Petersen. He had a talent for finding the most maxed-out and overrated guys, particularly during the second half of his tenure in Austin, when he could pretty much pick and choose who he wanted.

    And then Texas' recruiting started to drop off.

    Herman has a monster 2018 class. He better make something of it.
Sign In or Register to comment.