But could Eason transfer and start next year?!?

UWhuskytskeet

Actually, yeah. Maybe.

http://twitter.com/ESPN_Schick/status/953671983866277888

Probably wouldn't go into effect immediately, but prayingdog.png

BaldwinIV

Fuck that rule. Open recruiting 247 poaching of current players players bailing if they don't play after 1 year total insanity cats and dogs living together

HuskyJW

BaldwinIV said:

Fuck that rule. Open recruiting 247 poaching of current players players bailing if they don't play after 1 year total insanity cats and dogs living together

Coaches can so should players.

Bread

If it passes it should go into effect immediately. Otherwise thats like the ncaa saying fuck you to everyone who transfered this year.

BaldwinIV

HuskyJW said:

BaldwinIV said:

Fuck that rule. Open recruiting 247 poaching of current players players bailing if they don't play after 1 year total insanity cats and dogs living together

Coaches can so should players.

So you need to keep recruiting a kid all 4-5 years he's at your school? LOI day means nothing? Sounds like lunacy.

doogie

Sounds like roster management to me.

You make $5 Million/year. You just added a 10th assistant. Figure it out.

BleachedAnusDawg

Play this scenario out beyond college. If people want to bitch about coaches being able to leave whenever they want even when they have a contract! then I guess we should rip up all professional player contracts, too, when their coach leaves or is fired. Whether they are a paid pro or a college amateur it's the same thing in principle.

I would only support this model if it also allows coaches to cut shit players at the end of each season and have their scholly available for someone else. Could be combined with college athletes getting a stipend salary of some amount and it probably doesn't do anything to harm the big boy programs who can pay more to keep kids on the bench.

FYFMFE

dnc

BleachedAnusDawg said:

Play this scenario out beyond college. If people want to bitch about coaches being able to leave whenever they want even when they have a contract! then I guess we should rip up all professional player contracts, too, when their coach leaves or is fired. Whether they are a paid pro or a college amateur it's the same thing in principle.

I would only support this model if it also allows coaches to cut shit players at the end of each season and have their scholly available for someone else. Could be combined with college athletes getting a stipend salary of some amount and it probably doesn't do anything to harm the big boy programs who can pay more to keep kids on the bench.

FYFMFE

It's not the same thing in principle.

Pros are paid. College players are not. That's a massively different level of commitment.

When the NCAA does the right thing and pays players then making them sit out a year to transfer is fine. Until then, this is the right move.

BleachedAnusDawg

dnc said:

BleachedAnusDawg said:

Play this scenario out beyond college. If people want to bitch about coaches being able to leave whenever they want even when they have a contract! then I guess we should rip up all professional player contracts, too, when their coach leaves or is fired. Whether they are a paid pro or a college amateur it's the same thing in principle.

I would only support this model if it also allows coaches to cut shit players at the end of each season and have their scholly available for someone else. Could be combined with college athletes getting a stipend salary of some amount and it probably doesn't do anything to harm the big boy programs who can pay more to keep kids on the bench.

FYFMFE

It's not the same thing in principle.

Pros are paid. College players are not. That's a massively different level of commitment.

When the NCAA does the right thing and pays players then making them sit out a year to transfer is fine. Until then, this is the right move.

Players are compensated. Please tell me which NFL team is going to pay an 18 year old who is 3-4 years away from being physically able to survive an NFL game.

AIRWOLF

I am all for common sense reforms to the transfer rules that would give student athletes more say over where they play (and go to school, ha!), but this seems change seems like it might go a little too far.

RaceBannon

This rule once again helps Petersen IMO. We? may get frustrated at times with his recruiting approach but it will be even more vital to recruit football players not recruiting all stars. Guys that love football and aren't afraid to compete won't bail at the first demotion

NEsnake12

I'd be okay with this rule change if they limit the number of immediate transfers that schools can take to a max of like 2-3 per year. Otherwise some blue blood teams could consistently exploit this and essentially turn G5 and FCS schools (and even dreck P5 schools) into farm teams.

RaceBannon

NEsnake12 said:

I'd be okay with this rule change if they limit the number of immediate transfers that schools can take to a max of like 2-3 per year. Otherwise some blue blood teams could consistently exploit this and essentially turn G5 and FCS schools (and even Pac 12 schools) into farm teams.

TTJ

bananasnblondes

UWhuskytskeet said:

Actually, yeah. Maybe.

http://twitter.com/ESPN_Schick/status/953671983866277888

Probably wouldn't go into effect immediately, but prayingdog.png

If that happens, he ain't transferring to UW

LaZoris

bananasnblondes said:

UWhuskytskeet said:

Actually, yeah. Maybe.

http://twitter.com/ESPN_Schick/status/953671983866277888

Probably wouldn't go into effect immediately, but prayingdog.png

If that happens, he ain't transferring to UW

Cuogs

uzi

If this rule change happens, does it mean there is a better chance that we can convince Browning to transfer to Oregon State?