It's a deep dive into the darkness of the human colon
Must hold back and not be a thread jacking asshole!
Wood
She used to be #1 on my celebrity list. She's still top 5. Bad chica.
So basically Mean Girls was the hottest movie of all time then?
Means Girls needs a sequel - though they are past college age - where the gals go off to college, join a sorority, get drunk frequently and engage in sexual hijinks with frats, football teams, older sugar daddies, etc.
Maybe cast one of them as a waitress as Joey's with an obsession on tequila drinking football coaches and their dongs.
It's a deep dive into the darkness of the human colon
Must hold back and not be a thread jacking asshole!
Wood
She used to be #1 on my celebrity list. She's still top 5. Bad chica.
So basically Mean Girls was the hottest movie of all time then?
Means Girls needs a sequel - though they are past college age - where the gals go off to college, join a sorority, get drunk frequently and engage in sexual hijinks with frats, football teams, older sugar daddies, etc.
Maybe cast one of them as a waitress as Joey's with an obsession on tequila drinking football coaches and their dongs.
It's a deep dive into the darkness of the human colon
Must hold back and not be a thread jacking asshole!
Wood
She used to be #1 on my celebrity list. She's still top 5. Bad chica.
So basically Mean Girls was the hottest movie of all time then?
Means Girls needs a sequel - though they are past college age - where the gals go off to college, join a sorority, get drunk frequently and engage in sexual hijinks with frats, football teams, older sugar daddies, etc.
Maybe cast one of them as a waitress as Joey's with an obsession on tequila drinking football coaches and their dongs.
M'eh. I need Rachel McAdams tittays or nothing at all.
It's a deep dive into the darkness of the human colon
Must hold back and not be a thread jacking asshole!
Wood
She used to be #1 on my celebrity list. She's still top 5. Bad chica.
So basically Mean Girls was the hottest movie of all time then?
Means Girls needs a sequel - though they are past college age - where the gals go off to college, join a sorority, get drunk frequently and engage in sexual hijinks with frats, football teams, older sugar daddies, etc.
Maybe cast one of them as a waitress as Joey's with an obsession on tequila drinking football coaches and their dongs.
M'eh. I need Rachel McAdams tittays or nothing at all.
Its always way more special when they cast girls in their late 20s to play high school girls.
I think I'll root for another team if Browning starts at QB next year.
Browning is starting at Auburn...will Pete pull a Saban and insert Haener? No@ Haener isnt that f-ing phenom Saban has over there. Now, if Browning is eating lunch on his back foot the 1st half, you might see a change-up to a mobile true frosh who is here for spring ball. Will he be ready? Fuck no. But can he help make Auburns defense a little honest? Perhaps. Either way, Jake will be back under center in game 2 and the aforementioned unlikely.
I think we'll move ball a little on Auburn with Jake.
I think I'll root for another team if Browning starts at QB next year.
Browning is starting at Auburn...will Pete pull a Saban and insert Haener? No@ Haener isnt that f-ing phenom Saban has over there. Now, if Browning is eating lunch on his back foot the 1st half, you might see a change-up to a mobile true frosh who is here for spring ball. Will he be ready? Fuck no. But can he help make Auburns defense a little honest? Perhaps. Either way, Jake will be back under center in game 2 and the aforementioned unlikely.
I think we'll move ball a little on Auburn with Jake.
I think I'll root for another team if Browning starts at QB next year.
Browning is starting at Auburn...will Pete pull a Saban and insert Haener? No@ Haener isnt that f-ing phenom Saban has over there. Now, if Browning is eating lunch on his back foot the 1st half, you might see a change-up to a mobile true frosh who is here for spring ball. Will he be ready? Fuck no. But can he help make Auburns defense a little honest? Perhaps. Either way, Jake will be back under center in game 2 and the aforementioned unlikely.
I think we'll move ball a little on Auburn with Jake.
Pete is going to insert Haener?!
Try reading comprehension buttsniffer, fuck baze! Instead of pouncing on my shit ignorantly, like you do jr high girls in the fall, read the fucking post
I think I'll root for another team if Browning starts at QB next year.
Browning is starting at Auburn...will Pete pull a Saban and insert Haener? No@ Haener isnt that f-ing phenom Saban has over there. Now, if Browning is eating lunch on his back foot the 1st half, you might see a change-up to a mobile true frosh who is here for spring ball. Will he be ready? Fuck no. But can he help make Auburns defense a little honest? Perhaps. Either way, Jake will be back under center in game 2 and the aforementioned unlikely.
I think we'll move ball a little on Auburn with Jake.
Pete is going to insert Haener?!
Try reading comprehension buttsniffer, fuck baze! Instead of pouncing on my shit ignorantly, like you do jr high girls in the fall, read the fucking post
Your post: - Pete may or may not play Browning against Auburn. - Pete may put Haener in, but he might not. - Haener may perhaps keep Auburn's defense honest. - UW will move the ball a little on Auburn with Jake. How much is a little and which Jake are you talking about, asshole?
Pete might employ the triple Jake option against Auburn.
I think I'll root for another team if Browning starts at QB next year.
Browning is starting at Auburn...will Pete pull a Saban and insert Haener? No@ Haener isnt that f-ing phenom Saban has over there. Now, if Browning is eating lunch on his back foot the 1st half, you might see a change-up to a mobile true frosh who is here for spring ball. Will he be ready? Fuck no. But can he help make Auburns defense a little honest? Perhaps. Either way, Jake will be back under center in game 2 and the aforementioned unlikely.
I think we'll move ball a little on Auburn with Jake.
Pete is going to insert Haener?!
Try reading comprehension buttsniffer, fuck baze! Instead of pouncing on my shit ignorantly, like you do jr high girls in the fall, read the fucking post
Your post: - Pete may or may not play Browning against Auburn. - Pete may put Haener in, but he might not. - Haener may perhaps keep Auburn's defense honest. - UW will move the ball a little on Auburn with Jake. How much is a little and which Jake are you talking about, asshole?
Pete might employ the triple Jake option against Auburn.
Irregardless, it will be interesting.
Is Haener a TRUE FUCKING FRESHMAN MOBILE QB WHO WILL BE HERE IN SPRING? Again, try reading baze. You are quite possibly the dumbest poster here. Baaby, youve been promoted.
Back to drooling on the chain link fences outside the schoolyard with ya baze...be careful, there are cameras everywhere now ...pounce with caution
I think I'll root for another team if Browning starts at QB next year.
Browning is starting at Auburn...will Pete pull a Saban and insert Haener? No@ Haener isnt that f-ing phenom Saban has over there. Now, if Browning is eating lunch on his back foot the 1st half, you might see a change-up to a mobile true frosh who is here for spring ball. Will he be ready? Fuck no. But can he help make Auburns defense a little honest? Perhaps. Either way, Jake will be back under center in game 2 and the aforementioned unlikely.
I think we'll move ball a little on Auburn with Jake.
Pete is going to insert Haener?!
Try reading comprehension buttsniffer, fuck baze! Instead of pouncing on my shit ignorantly, like you do jr high girls in the fall, read the fucking post
Your post: - Pete may or may not play Browning against Auburn. - Pete may put Haener in, but he might not. - Haener may perhaps keep Auburn's defense honest. - UW will move the ball a little on Auburn with Jake. How much is a little and which Jake are you talking about, asshole?
Pete might employ the triple Jake option against Auburn.
Irregardless, it will be interesting.
Is Haener a TRUE FUCKING FRESHMAN MOBILE QB WHO WILL BE HERE IN SPRING? Again, try reading baze. You are quite possibly the dumbest poster here. Baaby, youve been promoted.
Back to drooling on the chain link fences outside the schoolyard with ya baze...be careful, there are cameras everywhere now ...pounce with caution
Well if you would post clearly and wouldn't be all over the map with your bullshit...
Comments
Maybe cast one of them as a waitress as Joey's with an obsession on tequila drinking football coaches and their dongs.
mcadams is rocking too
You can tell he trusts him and looks for him.He even threw it up the seam to BB.
Everyone thought Ty Jones was some god and he barely saw the field until the end. Can't expect much more from Ozzy/Spiker.
Chico is probably the safe bet, but for the sake of reaching I'll go:
1. Hunter Bryant
2. Chico
3. Ty Jones
Its always way more special when they cast girls in their late 20s to play high school girls.
These chicks look like 18
I think we'll move ball a little on Auburn with Jake.
- Pete may or may not play Browning against Auburn.
- Pete may put Haener in, but he might not.
- Haener may perhaps keep Auburn's defense honest.
- UW will move the ball a little on Auburn with Jake. How much is a little and which Jake are you talking about, asshole?
Pete might employ the triple Jake option against Auburn.
Irregardless, it will be interesting.
Back to drooling on the chain link fences outside the schoolyard with ya baze...be careful, there are cameras everywhere now ...pounce with caution