Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Confession

fivehundredmileDAWGfivehundredmileDAWG Member Posts: 1,212
in Hardcore Husky Board
I dooged hard tonight.

Does that mean I should get full blown AIDS and die a slow miserable death...? Or can I just light myself on fire using premium unleaded as the accelerant of choice...?

Please advise

... At least I am at peace. ..
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • Homebrew_DawgHomebrew_Dawg Member Posts: 1,650
    Only doogs choose their own accelerant. Confess all, little grasshopper.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • fivehundredmileDAWGfivehundredmileDAWG Member Posts: 1,212
    I pulled for the FURD ... Hard.

    It made me feel good inside.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    I only wanted Stanford to win so I could talk shit to some in here who said Oregon would beat Bama.

    So yes I wanted Oregon to lose just so I can say I was right.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • loadsockloadsock Member Posts: 686
    fivehundredmileDAWG said:

    I dooged hard tonight.

    Does that mean I should get full blown AIDS and die a slow miserable death...? Or can I just light myself on fire using premium unleaded as the accelerant of choice...?

    Please advise

    ... At least I am at peace. ..

    Instead of premium unleaded, just use regular unleaded and find some octane booster around your house or garage.

    In this economy, you have to look out for your family with such an important decision.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,948 Founders Club
    edited November 2013
    I've never understood the "You're a Doog retard If you root against Oregon!!" HHB mantra, other than when Doogs talk about trading four wins for one win against Oregon.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,304 Founders Club
    CuntWaffle said:

    I was rooting for Stanford too because it was awesome to see some old school TOP pound the ball all night offense control the game and hold this new school hurry up stuff to 13 points.

    I don't dislike the new offenses, they are fun to watch, but Stanford running their gameplan almost to perfection (fucking special teams) was cool.

    Totally agree.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,751
    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    I've never understood the "You're a Doog retard If you root against Oregon!!" HHB mantra, other than when Doogs talk about trading four wins for one win against Oregon.

    You're not a doog if you root against Whoregon (LOL!), you're a doog if you care more about Oregon losing than Washington winning.

    Being Oregon's little brother is what being a doog is all about.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,304 Founders Club
    edited November 2013
    tracker said:


    I was pulling for Stanford because I enjoy watching traditional Husky football.

    Nothing Doogish 'bout that.

    Agree, but it is more than a little depressing to think we have to watch Stanford to see Husky Football instead of seeing it from the Huskies. Remind me again, where was Stanford at as a program and what did they look like when Harbaugh took over? How long did it take him to have them playing Husky Football? Did they implode when Stanford had to replace him? Did they implode when they had to replace a quarterback who was the top pick in the NFL draft?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnctopdawgnc Member Posts: 7,838
    Southerndawg said:

    tracker said:


    I was pulling for Stanford because I enjoy watching traditional Husky football.

    Nothing Doogish 'bout that.

    Agree, but it is more than a little depressing to think we have to watch Stanford to see Husky Football instead of seeing it from the Huskies. Remind me again, where was Stanford at as a program and what did they look like when Harbaugh took over? How long did it take him to have them playing Husky Football? Did they implode when Stanford had to replace him? Did they implode when they had to replace a quarterback who was the top pick in the NFL draft?
    Have you forgotten about 0-12?

    And you have NO idea the damage Tyrone Willingham did to the program.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CFetters_Nacho_LoverCFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,432 Founders Club
    Southerndawg said:

    tracker said:


    I was pulling for Stanford because I enjoy watching traditional Husky football.

    Nothing Doogish 'bout that.

    Agree, but it is more than a little depressing to think we have to watch Stanford to see Husky Football instead of seeing it from the Huskies. Remind me again, where was Stanford at as a program and what did they look like when Harbaugh took over? How long did it take him to have them playing Husky Football? Did they implode when Stanford had to replace him? Did they implode when they had to replace a quarterback who was the top pick in the NFL draft?
    The rebuttal used every time a Doog says 0-12, young, Sark needs more time should simply be Stanford.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,304 Founders Club
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

    Southerndawg said:

    tracker said:


    I was pulling for Stanford because I enjoy watching traditional Husky football.

    Nothing Doogish 'bout that.

    Agree, but it is more than a little depressing to think we have to watch Stanford to see Husky Football instead of seeing it from the Huskies. Remind me again, where was Stanford at as a program and what did they look like when Harbaugh took over? How long did it take him to have them playing Husky Football? Did they implode when Stanford had to replace him? Did they implode when they had to replace a quarterback who was the top pick in the NFL draft?
    The rebuttal used every time a Doog says 0-12, young, Sark needs more time should simply be Stanford.
    Couldn't agree more. 0-12, too young, needs more time, and coaching stability are all blown out of the water with one example.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    Nevermind that Stanford was a 1-10 mess and if not for an awful coach they would have gone 0fer.

    I'm willing to bet that 2009 UW team had way more NFL players on their roster than the 2007 Cardinal team.

    They lost Gerhert so they'll go back to being Stanford

    They lost Harbaugh so they'll go back to being Stanford

    They lost Luck so they'll go back to being Stanford

    Guess what? They are here to stay. Proving all Doog and Iron Laws(Both are the same I know) to be completely full of shit.

    This also gives me hope that if UW were to hire a good coach whether it be luck(Emmert did hire Saban) or skill(doubtful with Pool Boy) that UW can start pumping out BCS games.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.