Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Bannon - Russia nothingburger was treasonous

2

Comments

  • Dude61
    Dude61 Member Posts: 1,254
    I forget, is Steve Bannon a conspiracy theorist, or did all that change today?
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    It still is. HTH

    Here's the real story about to break

    foxnews.com/opinion/2018/01/03/john-fund-will-media-ask-questions-about-fbi-cover-up-or-become-complicit-in-it.html

    But now a new story is about to bust open, involving Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. Nunes sent a letter Thursday to the Justice Department demanding compliance by Wednesday with the subpoenas his committee issued for information on how the department and its FBI subsidiary have handled the Russia probe.

    If the Justice Department stonewalls, the House could launch contempt proceedings or even vote to declassify and release some of the documents.

    Nunes didn’t mince words in his letter. Noting the four months of stonewalling he’s gotten, he concluded that “at this point it seems the DOJ (Justice Department) and FBI need to be investigating themselves.”

    Nunes documented a series of evasive maneuvers by the Justice Department. As a result of these maneuvers, documents and witnesses subpoenaed by his committee last August have still not been produced. Most relate to the dossier of unverified alleged connections – some financial and some salacious – between Donald Trump and Russia, compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele.

    The dossier was paid for by the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign. But it attracted the attention of the FBI, which dispatched three agents to interview Steele in Rome. The FBI even planned a few weeks before the 2016 election to pay Steele to continue his work.

    Nunes wants to know if the FBI went further and caused the Steele dossier to be used as a justification for warrants to engage in the surveillance of Trump campaign figures before the election. The congressman’s letter raises the intriguing question: are there two forms of possible collusion from the 2016 campaign that need to investigated?

    It's almost like Congress can launch investigations (Benghazi and emails) but have chosen not to launch any about the Steele dossier or uranium one. Why is that Race?
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,695 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    It still is. HTH

    Here's the real story about to break

    foxnews.com/opinion/2018/01/03/john-fund-will-media-ask-questions-about-fbi-cover-up-or-become-complicit-in-it.html

    But now a new story is about to bust open, involving Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. Nunes sent a letter Thursday to the Justice Department demanding compliance by Wednesday with the subpoenas his committee issued for information on how the department and its FBI subsidiary have handled the Russia probe.

    If the Justice Department stonewalls, the House could launch contempt proceedings or even vote to declassify and release some of the documents.

    Nunes didn’t mince words in his letter. Noting the four months of stonewalling he’s gotten, he concluded that “at this point it seems the DOJ (Justice Department) and FBI need to be investigating themselves.”

    Nunes documented a series of evasive maneuvers by the Justice Department. As a result of these maneuvers, documents and witnesses subpoenaed by his committee last August have still not been produced. Most relate to the dossier of unverified alleged connections – some financial and some salacious – between Donald Trump and Russia, compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele.

    The dossier was paid for by the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign. But it attracted the attention of the FBI, which dispatched three agents to interview Steele in Rome. The FBI even planned a few weeks before the 2016 election to pay Steele to continue his work.

    Nunes wants to know if the FBI went further and caused the Steele dossier to be used as a justification for warrants to engage in the surveillance of Trump campaign figures before the election. The congressman’s letter raises the intriguing question: are there two forms of possible collusion from the 2016 campaign that need to investigated?

    It's almost like Congress can launch investigations (Benghazi and emails) but have chosen not to launch any about the Steele dossier or uranium one. Why is that Race?
    Nunes is in Congress you blithering idiot

    You sound scared
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    It still is. HTH

    Here's the real story about to break

    foxnews.com/opinion/2018/01/03/john-fund-will-media-ask-questions-about-fbi-cover-up-or-become-complicit-in-it.html

    But now a new story is about to bust open, involving Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. Nunes sent a letter Thursday to the Justice Department demanding compliance by Wednesday with the subpoenas his committee issued for information on how the department and its FBI subsidiary have handled the Russia probe.

    If the Justice Department stonewalls, the House could launch contempt proceedings or even vote to declassify and release some of the documents.

    Nunes didn’t mince words in his letter. Noting the four months of stonewalling he’s gotten, he concluded that “at this point it seems the DOJ (Justice Department) and FBI need to be investigating themselves.”

    Nunes documented a series of evasive maneuvers by the Justice Department. As a result of these maneuvers, documents and witnesses subpoenaed by his committee last August have still not been produced. Most relate to the dossier of unverified alleged connections – some financial and some salacious – between Donald Trump and Russia, compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele.

    The dossier was paid for by the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign. But it attracted the attention of the FBI, which dispatched three agents to interview Steele in Rome. The FBI even planned a few weeks before the 2016 election to pay Steele to continue his work.

    Nunes wants to know if the FBI went further and caused the Steele dossier to be used as a justification for warrants to engage in the surveillance of Trump campaign figures before the election. The congressman’s letter raises the intriguing question: are there two forms of possible collusion from the 2016 campaign that need to investigated?

    It's almost like Congress can launch investigations (Benghazi and emails) but have chosen not to launch any about the Steele dossier or uranium one. Why is that Race?
    Nunes is in Congress you blithering idiot

    You sound scared
    Answer the question. Why doesn't Congress launch an investigation?
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,695 Founders Club
    Nunes is in Congress you blithering idiot

    Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. Nunes sent a letter Thursday to the Justice Department demanding compliance by Wednesday with the subpoenas his committee issued for information on how the department and its FBI subsidiary have handled the Russia probe.


    its already launched you blithering idiot
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,919

    Nunes is in Congress you blithering idiot

    Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. Nunes sent a letter Thursday to the Justice Department demanding compliance by Wednesday with the subpoenas his committee issued for information on how the department and its FBI subsidiary have handled the Russia probe.


    its already launched you blithering idiot

    It doesn't matter Dude.


    Trump's a racist Man.
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 6,015
    HondoFS ringing in the New Year in style...must have been a rough Holiday for him.
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 6,015
    On a side note, looks like this Wolff author made up at least part of his shock quotes for $$$...



    I imagine much will be found out to be the same with Bannon.

    As for Trump/Bannon...they have to separate now because Trump is going to sign off on a DACA/wall deal, and Bannon can't/won't be a part of that. Its at least 50/50 they get back together in some form to minimize losses for the midterm elections though.

  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    Bannon is running for President. I’m guessing he’ll hook up with David Stockman as his Econ advisor.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,695 Founders Club
    A DACA / Wall deal needs to be done. We? aren't kicking out the "Dreamers" but it is good leverage