He wasn't going their for the coach. He would because of his brother. his brother already signed and even if he gets a release he ain't coming here(maybe he would idk shit about recruiting).
If I were a chick I would 100 percent sue my company for sexual harassment right this moment.
You'd be an idiot not to these days and I would start young. Every high school has a semi-creepy teacher. Sue them.
Sue your university. You'll find something in those 4 or 5 years.
Sue your employer every five years then bail to a new job. NDA's, no one can talk about what happened before.
Retire loaded. Vaginas are a gold mine right now.
Vaginas has always been a gold mine. @HarveyWeinsteinDawg entered into settlement agreements like normal dudes take a shit.
Now chicks want to keep the money AND out their alleged assailants. It's going to fuck over the gals who may have valid claims.
Dudes are going to lawyer up big time on defense lawyers and skip the settlement phase. If there's a risk of losing both dollars and reputation, they'll just say fuck it and go to war. Burden of proof is now on the gal.
Stupid #metoo shit. Same way the left lost the White House by being overt dumbshits and impatient pressing too hard on BLM and transgender bathrooms.
There's no way that I'd ever want to work at a place where after a 10 week investigation of unsubstantiated claims that I'm fired just so that the University doesn't come across as condoning the behavior and have to pay material damages in the pending lawsuit.
I'm absolutely all for holding people accountable for their actions ... but at the same time we're at a point where we're way too easy to claim that people are guilty until proven innocent ... and in some cases, there's no way to prove innocence on this.
He was fired go for going 7-6 in year 6, CHRIST.
Also they could noy substantiate the claims with the alleged victim not participating because of litigation. So you might want to LIPO before getting on your soapbox on this one.
I’m not on a soap box on this one ... it’s just a dangerous precedent IMO that we assume guilt before innocence
There's no way that I'd ever want to work at a place where after a 10 week investigation of unsubstantiated claims that I'm fired just so that the University doesn't come across as condoning the behavior and have to pay material damages in the pending lawsuit.
I'm absolutely all for holding people accountable for their actions ... but at the same time we're at a point where we're way too easy to claim that people are guilty until proven innocent ... and in some cases, there's no way to prove innocence on this.
He was fired go for going 7-6 in year 6, CHRIST.
Also they could noy substantiate the claims with the alleged victim not participating because of litigation. So you might want to LIPO before getting on your soapbox on this one.
I’m not on a soap box on this one ... it’s just a dangerous precedent IMO that we assume guilt before innocence
Rich Rod is getting paid pursuant to the terms of his contract for early termination. There's no issue.
I read it as they couldn't substantiate the complaint bu found something else while looking into it
Perhaps a pattern of behavior?
That's really every pretend lawyer's advice to the client who says, "they'll never find that!" Yeah, dumb fuck, they probably won't. But if the result of it is to fire up an audit, they will find something. An audit always finds something. The goal, salemkewg, is to not be audited in the first place.
There's no way that I'd ever want to work at a place where after a 10 week investigation of unsubstantiated claims that I'm fired just so that the University doesn't come across as condoning the behavior and have to pay material damages in the pending lawsuit.
I'm absolutely all for holding people accountable for their actions ... but at the same time we're at a point where we're way too easy to claim that people are guilty until proven innocent ... and in some cases, there's no way to prove innocence on this.
He was fired go for going 7-6 in year 6, CHRIST.
Also they could noy substantiate the claims with the alleged victim not participating because of litigation. So you might want to LIPO before getting on your soapbox on this one.
I’m not on a soap box on this one ... it’s just a dangerous precedent IMO that we assume guilt before innocence
Rich Rod is getting paid pursuant to the terms of his contract for early termination. There's no issue.
Get that ... can imagine seeing a lawsuit for damage to reputation and the like
Comments
Now chicks want to keep the money AND out their alleged assailants. It's going to fuck over the gals who may have valid claims.
Dudes are going to lawyer up big time on defense lawyers and skip the settlement phase. If there's a risk of losing both dollars and reputation, they'll just say fuck it and go to war. Burden of proof is now on the gal.
Stupid #metoo shit. Same way the left lost the White House by being overt dumbshits and impatient pressing too hard on BLM and transgender bathrooms.
Perhaps a pattern of behavior?