Village idiot confirms his small penis
Comments
-
You are offended but I will add being FS. To add to your really long list, Trump didn't "making fun of dropping nukes" despite you hysterically claiming otherwise, but reading much less comprehending is not a specialty of yours.2001400ex said:
Lol then you go off the deep end and say I'm offended? Um no. But keep gurgling Trump's balls. Hope they are salty.HoustonHusky said:2001400ex said:
Da fuq? So negotiating like an adult is seen as awful and shitty. But making fun of dropping nukes is now the standard behavior and you support that? Lol ok! Gurgle trumps balls just a little more will ya.HoustonHusky said:Its comedy seeing all the faux outrage on this...its like a bunch of folks here are 11 year old girls.
All it is is a tacky way to put Un in his place...NK's negotiations for the last 20 years has involved blowing up some nukes/missiles to try and prove how important they are before they come to the negotiating table and get everything they can. Previously everybody has let them do it and for the most part given in to them...every time Un has been doing it in the last year Trump goes out of his way to put him in his place as not an equal. Its BSchool negotiating 101. The fact NK just contacted SK for the first time in 2 years reinforces that point.
Getting the HondoFS, Boobs, and CirrhosisOfTheBrains of the world's panties in a wad is just an added bonus.
-
No amount of sanctions would have kept the NKs from building a bomb, only an invasion would have and the Chinese vetoed that in 1950. Diplomacy had nothing to do with it and the sanctions regime doesn't either.HoustonHusky said:NK isn't the Soviets nor Israel, and it was "diplomats" negotiating like "diplomats" for 20+ years that got the situation into the current mess it is. And its a big mess.
Regime change never was on the table for us...nobody wants to take over a country that is basically living like its 500 years ago. China and SK may be forced to, but that's a them problem not a us problem.
And Trump in his tacky way is making NK too much of a pariah to shelter under the wing of China and Russia, which is better negotiating than has happened in the last 20+ years.
Any sovereign state that wants nukes badly enough can get them. -
Back to boobs and fusion. The NY Times is now struggling as bad as boobs and hondo on trying to justify Obama spying on a political opponent.
Never Trump National Review -
Maybe, Maybe not. But not enforcing sanctions and giving regimes money, fuel oil, and everything else to prop them up when they structurally very weak (aka NK and Iran) is FS, which has been the "diplomatic" negotiating policy for the last 20+ years.
And all its done is create a lot of messes in the world. -
Ok!HoustonHusky said:
You are offended but I will add being FS. To add to your really long list, Trump didn't "making fun of dropping nukes" despite you hysterically claiming otherwise, but reading much less comprehending is not a specialty of yours.2001400ex said:
Lol then you go off the deep end and say I'm offended? Um no. But keep gurgling Trump's balls. Hope they are salty.HoustonHusky said:2001400ex said:
Da fuq? So negotiating like an adult is seen as awful and shitty. But making fun of dropping nukes is now the standard behavior and you support that? Lol ok! Gurgle trumps balls just a little more will ya.HoustonHusky said:Its comedy seeing all the faux outrage on this...its like a bunch of folks here are 11 year old girls.
All it is is a tacky way to put Un in his place...NK's negotiations for the last 20 years has involved blowing up some nukes/missiles to try and prove how important they are before they come to the negotiating table and get everything they can. Previously everybody has let them do it and for the most part given in to them...every time Un has been doing it in the last year Trump goes out of his way to put him in his place as not an equal. Its BSchool negotiating 101. The fact NK just contacted SK for the first time in 2 years reinforces that point.
Getting the HondoFS, Boobs, and CirrhosisOfTheBrains of the world's panties in a wad is just an added bonus. -
Actually it would be great to see Rocket man try to launch something at us. It would finally give us the juice to say Fuck China and make it an overflow parking lot for Hyundais and Kias.CirrhosisDawg said:Rocket Man and an obese orangutan escalating over who has the quicker and bigger trigger finger.
What could go wrong? -
There's a big difference in getting the material and then actually getting it to work as intended. Not any backwater nation can do that. You have to be watching and you have to do what you can to sabotage their efforts quietly. But when that doesn't work, then you have to take things into your own hands before they DO figure it out.AZDuck said:
No amount of sanctions would have kept the NKs from building a bomb, only an invasion would have and the Chinese vetoed that in 1950. Diplomacy had nothing to do with it and the sanctions regime doesn't either.HoustonHusky said:NK isn't the Soviets nor Israel, and it was "diplomats" negotiating like "diplomats" for 20+ years that got the situation into the current mess it is. And its a big mess.
Regime change never was on the table for us...nobody wants to take over a country that is basically living like its 500 years ago. China and SK may be forced to, but that's a them problem not a us problem.
And Trump in his tacky way is making NK too much of a pariah to shelter under the wing of China and Russia, which is better negotiating than has happened in the last 20+ years.
Any sovereign state that wants nukes badly enough can get them.
Something that the last administration didn't care to do. Too busy fluffing fags I suppose. -
You know the last administration successfully damaged the Iranian nuke program using an internet worm, right?salemcoog said:
There's a big difference in getting the material and then actually getting it to work as intended. Not any backwater nation can do that. You have to be watching and you have to do what you can to sabotage their efforts quietly. But when that doesn't work, then you have to take things into your own hands before they DO figure it out.AZDuck said:
No amount of sanctions would have kept the NKs from building a bomb, only an invasion would have and the Chinese vetoed that in 1950. Diplomacy had nothing to do with it and the sanctions regime doesn't either.HoustonHusky said:NK isn't the Soviets nor Israel, and it was "diplomats" negotiating like "diplomats" for 20+ years that got the situation into the current mess it is. And its a big mess.
Regime change never was on the table for us...nobody wants to take over a country that is basically living like its 500 years ago. China and SK may be forced to, but that's a them problem not a us problem.
And Trump in his tacky way is making NK too much of a pariah to shelter under the wing of China and Russia, which is better negotiating than has happened in the last 20+ years.
Any sovereign state that wants nukes badly enough can get them.
Something that the last administration didn't care to do. Too busy fluffing fags I suppose.
Sooner or later a sovereign actor is going to figure it out, though. -
So if we damaged their nuke program, Why did we need to give back their MVP terrorists and Billions of Dollars in a failed attempt at easier monitoring?AZDuck said:
You know the last administration successfully damaged the Iranian nuke program using an internet worm, right?salemcoog said:
There's a big difference in getting the material and then actually getting it to work as intended. Not any backwater nation can do that. You have to be watching and you have to do what you can to sabotage their efforts quietly. But when that doesn't work, then you have to take things into your own hands before they DO figure it out.AZDuck said:
No amount of sanctions would have kept the NKs from building a bomb, only an invasion would have and the Chinese vetoed that in 1950. Diplomacy had nothing to do with it and the sanctions regime doesn't either.HoustonHusky said:NK isn't the Soviets nor Israel, and it was "diplomats" negotiating like "diplomats" for 20+ years that got the situation into the current mess it is. And its a big mess.
Regime change never was on the table for us...nobody wants to take over a country that is basically living like its 500 years ago. China and SK may be forced to, but that's a them problem not a us problem.
And Trump in his tacky way is making NK too much of a pariah to shelter under the wing of China and Russia, which is better negotiating than has happened in the last 20+ years.
Any sovereign state that wants nukes badly enough can get them.
Something that the last administration didn't care to do. Too busy fluffing fags I suppose.
Sooner or later a sovereign actor is going to figure it out, though. -
Stuck nut is Israeli
-
I'm not Obama or the Israelis (@RaceBannon who yes, also worked on Stuxnet) - so I can't say, but recent history shows that countries that want nukes badly enough will get them eventually and that slowing their progress while nudging them toward the global mainstream isn't a bad approach. It worked with South Africa, Argentina, and Brazil, after all.salemcoog said:
So if we damaged their nuke program, Why did we need to give back their MVP terrorists and Billions of Dollars in a failed attempt at easier monitoring?AZDuck said:
You know the last administration successfully damaged the Iranian nuke program using an internet worm, right?salemcoog said:
There's a big difference in getting the material and then actually getting it to work as intended. Not any backwater nation can do that. You have to be watching and you have to do what you can to sabotage their efforts quietly. But when that doesn't work, then you have to take things into your own hands before they DO figure it out.AZDuck said:
No amount of sanctions would have kept the NKs from building a bomb, only an invasion would have and the Chinese vetoed that in 1950. Diplomacy had nothing to do with it and the sanctions regime doesn't either.HoustonHusky said:NK isn't the Soviets nor Israel, and it was "diplomats" negotiating like "diplomats" for 20+ years that got the situation into the current mess it is. And its a big mess.
Regime change never was on the table for us...nobody wants to take over a country that is basically living like its 500 years ago. China and SK may be forced to, but that's a them problem not a us problem.
And Trump in his tacky way is making NK too much of a pariah to shelter under the wing of China and Russia, which is better negotiating than has happened in the last 20+ years.
Any sovereign state that wants nukes badly enough can get them.
Something that the last administration didn't care to do. Too busy fluffing fags I suppose.
Sooner or later a sovereign actor is going to figure it out, though.
Also, Iran's economy is much more closely tied into the global one, and is thus more susceptible to economic pressure than NK. But if the mullahs want a bomb badly enough, they can probably make one tomorrow. -
Iran.... Mainstream....AZDuck said:
I'm not Obama or the Israelis (@RaceBannon who yes, also worked on Stuxnet) - so I can't say, but recent history shows that countries that want nukes badly enough will get them eventually and that slowing their progress while nudging them toward the global mainstream isn't a bad approach. It worked with South Africa, Argentina, and Brazil, after all.salemcoog said:
So if we damaged their nuke program, Why did we need to give back their MVP terrorists and Billions of Dollars in a failed attempt at easier monitoring?AZDuck said:
You know the last administration successfully damaged the Iranian nuke program using an internet worm, right?salemcoog said:
There's a big difference in getting the material and then actually getting it to work as intended. Not any backwater nation can do that. You have to be watching and you have to do what you can to sabotage their efforts quietly. But when that doesn't work, then you have to take things into your own hands before they DO figure it out.AZDuck said:
No amount of sanctions would have kept the NKs from building a bomb, only an invasion would have and the Chinese vetoed that in 1950. Diplomacy had nothing to do with it and the sanctions regime doesn't either.HoustonHusky said:NK isn't the Soviets nor Israel, and it was "diplomats" negotiating like "diplomats" for 20+ years that got the situation into the current mess it is. And its a big mess.
Regime change never was on the table for us...nobody wants to take over a country that is basically living like its 500 years ago. China and SK may be forced to, but that's a them problem not a us problem.
And Trump in his tacky way is making NK too much of a pariah to shelter under the wing of China and Russia, which is better negotiating than has happened in the last 20+ years.
Any sovereign state that wants nukes badly enough can get them.
Something that the last administration didn't care to do. Too busy fluffing fags I suppose.
Sooner or later a sovereign actor is going to figure it out, though.
Also, Iran's economy is much more closely tied into the global one, and is thus more susceptible to economic pressure than NK. But if the mullahs want a bomb badly enough, they can probably make one tomorrow.
You funny Joe. -
If only it was a Later Guys poast.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Making my point for me.RaceBannon said:
No he doesn't. Fusion has a track record of lying and colluding with RussiaTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Trump has a track record of distraction.RaceBannon said:
Jesus. Get helpTierbsHsotBoobs said:
It's a typical distraction.dnc said:
Trump's a nutjob, yet we all know he's not dropping any nukes. See also Lil Kim over in Norkland.CirrhosisDawg said:
The potus threatened a nuclear attack on North Korea in a tweet.dnc said:
Nothing is going to happen.CirrhosisDawg said:
Two insane people threatening certain death for millions is “faux” outrage?dnc said:
We both know they're both too pussy to actually #DoSomething, but the faux outrage is fun to watch.CirrhosisDawg said:Rocket Man and an obese orangutan escalating over who has the quicker and bigger trigger finger.
What could go wrong?
Delridge was a more desperate place than I ever could have imagined. Stay safe in Tennessee.
Tweets like this are the definition of faux outrage. Or are you telling me he's really insane enough to believe anyone who doesn't try to oust the president should be imprisoned?
You posted “faux outrage” from the Palmer report.
Great equivalency as always.
Pretending their little dick measuring is anything to actually gaf about is only playing politics, nothing more.
Feel free to provide a better explanation for this shit.
Trump has a track record of tweeting you round the bend
Good evening. -
Once upon a time, South Africa and Argentina were more like pariah states than Iran. Shit happens. Shit sometimes unhappens. Iran has an educated population and the mullahs are having a hard time with it.salemcoog said:
Iran.... Mainstream....AZDuck said:
I'm not Obama or the Israelis (@RaceBannon who yes, also worked on Stuxnet) - so I can't say, but recent history shows that countries that want nukes badly enough will get them eventually and that slowing their progress while nudging them toward the global mainstream isn't a bad approach. It worked with South Africa, Argentina, and Brazil, after all.salemcoog said:
So if we damaged their nuke program, Why did we need to give back their MVP terrorists and Billions of Dollars in a failed attempt at easier monitoring?AZDuck said:
You know the last administration successfully damaged the Iranian nuke program using an internet worm, right?salemcoog said:
There's a big difference in getting the material and then actually getting it to work as intended. Not any backwater nation can do that. You have to be watching and you have to do what you can to sabotage their efforts quietly. But when that doesn't work, then you have to take things into your own hands before they DO figure it out.AZDuck said:
No amount of sanctions would have kept the NKs from building a bomb, only an invasion would have and the Chinese vetoed that in 1950. Diplomacy had nothing to do with it and the sanctions regime doesn't either.HoustonHusky said:NK isn't the Soviets nor Israel, and it was "diplomats" negotiating like "diplomats" for 20+ years that got the situation into the current mess it is. And its a big mess.
Regime change never was on the table for us...nobody wants to take over a country that is basically living like its 500 years ago. China and SK may be forced to, but that's a them problem not a us problem.
And Trump in his tacky way is making NK too much of a pariah to shelter under the wing of China and Russia, which is better negotiating than has happened in the last 20+ years.
Any sovereign state that wants nukes badly enough can get them.
Something that the last administration didn't care to do. Too busy fluffing fags I suppose.
Sooner or later a sovereign actor is going to figure it out, though.
Also, Iran's economy is much more closely tied into the global one, and is thus more susceptible to economic pressure than NK. But if the mullahs want a bomb badly enough, they can probably make one tomorrow.
You funny Joe. -
These kinds of threads are HH's low-end equivalent of The View.
Hondo = Joy Behar.
Cirrho = Meghan McCain.
Boobs = Whoopie Goldberg.
Ozone = brain-dead, shit-list celebrity guest. -
That's rough, man. What did Joy Behar do to you?TurdBuffer said:These kinds of threads are HH's low-end equivalent of The View.
Hondo = Joy Behar.
Cirrho = Meghan McCain.
Boobs = Whoopie Goldberg.
Ozone = brain-dead, shit-list celebrity guest. -
Noted “View” expert heard from. Your viewership as regular as your period?TurdBuffer said:These kinds of threads are HH's low-end equivalent of The View.
Hondo = Joy Behar.
Cirrho = Meghan McCain.
Boobs = Whoopie Goldberg.
Ozone = brain-dead, shit-list celebrity guest. -
Agree. Even being a non-Trump fan, seeing others lose their shit over him, including leftists in real life gives me a perverted schadenfreude. #sadlifeHoustonHusky said:Its comedy seeing all the faux outrage on this...its like a bunch of folks here are 11 year old girls.
All it is is a tacky way to put Un in his place...NK's negotiations for the last 20 years has involved blowing up some nukes/missiles to try and prove how important they are before they come to the negotiating table and get everything they can. Previously everybody has let them do it and for the most part given in to them...every time Un has been doing it in the last year Trump goes out of his way to put him in his place as not an equal. Its BSchool negotiating 101. The fact NK just contacted SK for the first time in 2 years reinforces that point.
Getting the HondoFS, Boobs, and CirrhosisOfTheBrains of the world's panties in a wad is just an added bonus. -
Also, Iran's economy is much more closely tied into the global one, and is thus more susceptible to economic pressure than NK. But if the mullahs want a bomb badly enough, they can probably make one tomorrow.
Iran.... Mainstream....
You funny Joe.
Once upon a time, South Africa and Argentina were more like pariah states than Iran. Shit happens. Shit sometimes unhappens. Iran has an educated population and the mullahs are having a hard time with it.
Neither were rogue nation states with Nuclear aspirations or capability.
But good cut, Billy!
Keep your eye on the ball next time. -
Who.gifTurdBuffer said:These kinds of threads are HH's low-end equivalent of The View.
Hondo = Joy Behar.
Cirrho = Meghan McCain.
Boobs = Whoopie Goldberg.
Ozone = brain-dead, shit-list celebrity guest. -
Iran.... Mainstream....salemcoog said:
Also, Iran's economy is much more closely tied into the global one, and is thus more susceptible to economic pressure than NK. But if the mullahs want a bomb badly enough, they can probably make one tomorrow.
You funny Joe.
Once upon a time, South Africa and Argentina were more like pariah states than Iran. Shit happens. Shit sometimes unhappens. Iran has an educated population and the mullahs are having a hard time with it.
Neither were rogue nation states with Nuclear aspirations or capability.
But good cut, Billy!
Keep your eye on the ball next time.
You have the attention span of an adolescent mayfly.
South Africa sanctions
South Africa nuke program
Argentina hanging out with the PLO and Cuba
Argentina nuclear program
Troomps something something facts -
Look - we HAD to get that South Africa shit cleaned up because, well, Charlize Theron.
-
Once upon a time, South Africa and Argentina were more like pariah states than Iran. Shit happens. Shit sometimes unhappens. Iran has an educated population and the mullahs are having a hard time with it.AZDuck said:
Iran.... Mainstream....salemcoog said:
Also, Iran's economy is much more closely tied into the global one, and is thus more susceptible to economic pressure than NK. But if the mullahs want a bomb badly enough, they can probably make one tomorrow.
You funny Joe.
Neither were rogue nation states with Nuclear aspirations or capability.
But good cut, Billy!
Keep your eye on the ball next time.
You have the attention span of an adolescent mayfly.
South Africa sanctions South African sanctions were for Human rights violations within their borders. Not for vowing to wipe another nation(s) off of the map.
South Africa nuke program
South Africa had nuclear aspirations for half a minute but never were a threat to the free world.
Argentina hanging out with the PLO and Cuba
Ewwww.. Somebody told me that somebody else said that Argentina had a cup of coffee with the PLO. No threat to anyone outside their borders.
Argentina nuclear program
Argentina had a shortlived uranium enrichment program who was never of any danger to anyone, as it never got past enrichmnent status. Argentina never vowed to wipe anyone of the face of the earth either Your false equivalency generator is working overtime as per usual.
Troomps something something facts
-
Wood, wood & wood. Until it falls off.PurpleThrobber said:Look - we HAD to get that South Africa shit cleaned up because, well, Charlize Theron.
-
Trump tweets about the size of his Button, Bernouts and Chillary’s explode, Kim-less Un opens peace talks.
#stillwinning2018
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/north-korea-reopening-key-communication-channel-south-korea-donald-trump-kim-jong-un/