Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

OFFICIAL Oregon-Stanford thread

145791015

Comments

  • Gladstone
    Gladstone Member Posts: 16,425
    "They don't care that Oregon knows what is coming"

    I am so fucking envious, christ. That is what UW used to be. It isn't rocket science, doogs. Dominant lineplay. Physicality. Commit to the run.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,408 Standard Supporter
    tracker said:


    Whatever the outcome of this game, gotta say that Mark Helfrich is one impressive coach. He just seems like the real deal.

    Based on what? Wait a few years before anointing him. He couldn't have inherited a better situation.

  • mobey
    mobey Member Posts: 3,254
    Gladstone said:

    "They don't care that Oregon knows what is coming"

    I am so fucking envious, christ. That is what UW used to be. It isn't rocket science, doogs. Dominant lineplay. Physicality. Commit to the run.

    How is Sark going to be recognized as a genius if he simply runs it down teams' throats?

    No, recruit QBs and WRs and if you get a couple of big guys thrown in somewhere, throw them out in front of the stars.

    Anyway, it's the unis that are important.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,408 Standard Supporter
    mobey said:

    Gladstone said:

    "They don't care that Oregon knows what is coming"

    I am so fucking envious, christ. That is what UW used to be. It isn't rocket science, doogs. Dominant lineplay. Physicality. Commit to the run.

    How is Sark going to be recognized as a genius if he simply runs it down teams' throats?

    No, recruit QBs and WRs and if you get a couple of big guys thrown in somewhere, throw them out in front of the stars.

    Anyway, it's the unis that are important.
    I've been saying that for a few years. I have no other explanation why he goes away from the run at crucial times, especially early in games.

  • tracker
    tracker Member Posts: 866



    tracker said:


    Whatever the outcome of this game, gotta say that Mark Helfrich is one impressive coach. He just seems like the real deal.

    Based on what? Wait a few years before anointing him. He couldn't have inherited a better situation.

    I agree he inherited a great situation. My comment was really about his demeanor. Based on the interviews I've seen he comes across as very self-assured, thoughtful, intelligent. . .a coach with a clear idea of who he is and what he wants to do.

  • dhdawg said:

    shaw really fucked up his season with his play calling at Utah, he calls a run on 3rd and 2. They're preparing a move to 2nd in the country

    Could be back to back years that Stanford misses out on a national title due to weird decisions by Shaw.

    I won't say he is a bad coach because if he pulls this off his record will have spoke for itself.
  • Homebrew_Dawg
    Homebrew_Dawg Member Posts: 1,652
    Can Oregon spot 'furd 20? Or, will Helfrich have to settle for a moral victory?
  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    Stanford is so much better at everything. Oregon is sloppy and the special teams are shit. That's on the coach.
  • I love Stanford so much! They defy every Doog myth out there! They wear basic uni's(for the most part), run a boring offense that features the power I where they run the ball down your throat, they play discipline football that focuses on lack of penalties and special teams, more importantly they focus on great line play which they have on both sides.

    Oregon hasn't lost much the last few years but the times they do lose is because the opposing team has dominated the line of scrimmage. You'll never defeat Oregon with 5 WR sets, no huddle offense and trying to out score them.

    Stanford is what UW used to be. Stanford is just a reminder that the type of football that UW used to win with can still be successful today.
  • Homebrew_Dawg
    Homebrew_Dawg Member Posts: 1,652
    DAT looks, almost, pedestrian. I know he's coming of injury, but not impressed.