Browning vs. Tuiasosopo
Comments
-
I doubt they'll even say the competition is over.TurdBuffer said:Browning will start because he'll be the best QB in practices on account of his knowledge of the playbook. That's how coaches pick starters. It's a shame his breakdowns under the lights don't count for more, but coaches kill themselves to spread blame around after losses, which is what Pete, Saban, or any other coach does, hiding and burying Browning's shortcomings and fuck-ups among everyone else's. Coaches don't focus on the incremental and obvious failings, because that's not positive thinking. Plus we've had Smiffy sucking off Jake, Pete and himself for 3 years, during two of which UW won 10 games. They'll say the QB competition is "open" but it won't be. Only if Browning gets hurt and Yankoff or Sirmon comes in and engineer two or three stellar drives will we see any change due to high pressure from the fanbase.
The situation is akin to a prize fighting where 99% of the time a challenger cannot win a fight on points, but most knock out the champion to win the belt.
"Jake is our starter" will be the statement. And as much as I hate it, Browning's probably the right choice. A true freshman is highly unlikely to be better than Browning in 2018. -
I played against Chris Chandler. Don & Carol showed up at the game. Oh, the humiliation, although we won. Fucker was ready for the Pac10 as a HS Junior.
We can dream of better true frosh than Browning, can't we? -
Jake will be fine in practice because he can't be hit in practice.
-
I'd play sandlot ball against Jake.
ACL *snap* -
2018: At Auburn, South Dakota then at Utah? 1-2 with Browning after 3 games.
TSI-FUCKING-O! -
Pete, with Brownsocks sitting next to him:
“The Quarterback is really really good”
“McSorely is a heck of a player, he’s a great competitor and he just makes that whole thing go”
“When we got a little pressure on him, he stepped up or took off and ran, buying time, getting out of there”
-
This is the Boobs we love.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Jake will be fine in practice because he can't be hit in practice.
-
Thanks. Now I don't have to say it.TurdBuffer said:2018: At Auburn, South Dakota then at Utah? 1-2 with Browning after 3 games.
TSI-FUCKING-O! -
Then Petersen switches quarterbacks and goes David Shaw and wins outTurdBuffer said:2018: At Auburn, South Dakota then at Utah? 1-2 with Browning after 3 games.
TSI-FUCKING-O! -
This. Which is why it's such a shame that Jake's such a huge fucking pussy.dnc said:
I doubt they'll even say the competition is over.TurdBuffer said:Browning will start because he'll be the best QB in practices on account of his knowledge of the playbook. That's how coaches pick starters. It's a shame his breakdowns under the lights don't count for more, but coaches kill themselves to spread blame around after losses, which is what Pete, Saban, or any other coach does, hiding and burying Browning's shortcomings and fuck-ups among everyone else's. Coaches don't focus on the incremental and obvious failings, because that's not positive thinking. Plus we've had Smiffy sucking off Jake, Pete and himself for 3 years, during two of which UW won 10 games. They'll say the QB competition is "open" but it won't be. Only if Browning gets hurt and Yankoff or Sirmon comes in and engineer two or three stellar drives will we see any change due to high pressure from the fanbase.
The situation is akin to a prize fighting where 99% of the time a challenger cannot win a fight on points, but most knock out the champion to win the belt.
"Jake is our starter" will be the statement. And as much as I hate it, Browning's probably the right choice. A true freshman is highly unlikely to be better than Browning in 2018.
Fuck the sandlot. Put that fucker on a desert island and let him man up to survive. If he dies, then take it as a sign that we would indeed be better off starting a true freshman. No call for genocide - just overwhelming odds against his survival.
