Somebody splain this to me

PurpleThrobber

Why is the City of Seattle paying $150K on behalf of their deposed boy-diddling mayor for a crime he allegedly committed decades before he was Mayor?

Even then - why would the city be paying damages for a criminal act by an employee/elected official? Maybe if it happened in the mayor's office itself? Not even beginning to comprehend why this is a taxpayer funded payoff.

Other than liberal guilt, I can't fathom why that is on the public dole.

TierbsHsotBoobs

The city and its idiot voters should be liable for acts he committed while in office.

The rest, not so much.

Sledog

Liberals cover for sexual deviouts and Don't mind using our tac dollars to help them out.

doogie

PurpleThrobber said:

Why is the City of Seattle paying $150K on behalf of their deposed boy-diddling mayor for a crime he allegedly committed decades before he was Mayor?

Even then - why would the city be paying damages for a criminal act by an employee/elected official? Maybe if it happened in the mayor's office itself? Not even beginning to comprehend why this is a taxpayer funded payoff.

Other than liberal guilt, I can't fathom why that is on the public dole.

The City obviously feels liable for damages caused while the Former Mayor was conducting official business while in office.

LebamDawg

I think it is because the mayor was a pasty white guy and the law suit guy is black. they don't want bad press for a progressive city.