CFP Chair/Committee

RhythmicSlappingDawg

Why the fuck is the guy who hired and still continues to employ Kliff Kingsbury ( The younger faggier Mike Leach), the leader of the committee that decides who the best four teams in the cuntry are?


Also, get Ty Willingham and Condy Rice off the fucking committee.

TierbsHsotBoobs

They have picked the four best teams every year.

RhythmicSlappingDawg

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

They have picked the four best teams every year.

But, still. These guys are borderline retarded.

NeGgaPlEaSe

Best teams is very fucking subjective. How about some god damn objective measures like wining a fucking power 5 championship or gtfo.

Let’s take the best bowl game in college football away from the PAC 12 and Big 10 then tell you to GTFO and not invite you to the play offs after wining your championships.

Yeah my money is on Bama, but still

doogie

If you want to kill the Bowl games, this is as good of strategy you can get

dnc

NeGgaPlEaSe said:

Best teams is very fucking subjective. How about some god damn objective measures like wining a fucking power 5 championship or gtfo.

Let’s take the best bowl game in college football away from the PAC 12 and Big 10 then tell you to GTFO and not invite you to the play offs after wining your championships.

Yeah my money is on Bama, but still

That's not the committee's fault though. Given what they have to work with, they've gotten it right. Their process has been mostly shit, but so far it's avoided any disastrous results.

phineas

This thread feels a couple weeks late.

PurpleThrobber

RhythmicSlappingDawg said:

Why the fuck is the guy who hired and still continues to employ Kliff Kingsbury ( The younger faggier Mike Leach), the leader of the committee that decides who the best four teams in the cuntry are?


Also, get Ty Willingham and Condy Rice off the fucking committee.

https://bottomsupbros.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/kliff.jpg

I’d piss all over myself to have KKKliff Kingsbury’s life.

oregonblitzkrieg

NeGgaPlEaSe said:

Best teams is very fucking subjective. How about some god damn objective measures like wining a fucking power 5 championship or gtfo.

Let’s take the best bowl game in college football away from the PAC 12 and Big 10 then tell you to GTFO and not invite you to the play offs after wining your championships.

Yeah my money is on Bama, but still

Are you saying Ohio State, the same Ohio State that and got blown out by Clemson last year, and blown out by Iowa and Oklahoma this year, deserves to be in? Or USC, who lost to the coogs, got killed by ND and barely beat the best Texas team in years, deserves a spot? GTFOutta here with that chit. They seem to get it right most of the time.

TierbsHsotBoobs

NeGgaPlEaSe said:

Best teams is very fucking subjective. How about some god damn objective measures like wining a fucking power 5 championship or gtfo.

Let’s take the best bowl game in college football away from the PAC 12 and Big 10 then tell you to GTFO and not invite you to the play offs after wining your championships.

Yeah my money is on Bama, but still

If you get blown the fuck out by Iowa or Notre Dame, you aren't one of the four best teams.

HTH

TierbsHsotBoobs

doogie said:

If you want to kill the Bowl games, this is as good of strategy you can get

The Rose Bowl died in January 2002.

Fenderbender123

Almost every idea you could possibly imagine has been floated to try and make the playoff selection less subjective, but they are dismissed for legit reasons. Long story short, there's too many obstacles with all the different conferences and scheduling and shit. Probably other conflicts of interest as well.

The BCS was a step in the right direction. The current 4 team model is another step forward. It is slowly getting more objective.

The best idea to improve upon it further is to expand it to 8 teams. But that would create an extra game every year. Plus the committee will have to figure out what teams are 5th-8th best in the country. And that's a bit harder, because the closer you get to the middle of the pack, the more the teams start to look the same.

I think the committee has done a fine job every year. There's always gonna be some rationale for teams that barely get left out. I'm not denying that. But there has been and always will be rationale for the teams they chose to include. There's much to consider, and remember their job is to choose the 4 *best* teams over the course of the season.

Should we put in Alabama or Ohio State? That's about as close as it's ever gonna get. Ohio State played an extra game, won their conference, and has more quality wins. But they also have 2 losses, one of which was getting raped by a shitty Iowa team. Alabama's 1 loss was to a top 10 team. The conference champ stuff is nice, but it doesn't mitigate the extra loss and getting slaughtered by a shit team. That's just how CFB works.

oregonblitzkrieg

Agree, expand it to 8 teams but no more than that. If it goes to 16, too many shit teams will get post season opportunities that they don't deserve.

Fenderbender123

I don't think they'll expand it. At least not anytime soon. It would be yet another game on top of the already extra playoff game and conference championship games, and there's already been enough feedback on how the current system is challenging for the players. I wouldn't be against it (more football for me), but I think that will be the rationale.

Maybe if we switch back to 11 game seasons? I don't know.

oregonblitzkrieg

Fenderbender123 said:

I don't think they'll expand it. At least not anytime soon. It would be yet another game on top of the already extra playoff game and conference championship games, and there's already been enough feedback on how the current system is challenging for the players. I wouldn't be against it (more football for me), but I think that will be the rationale.

Maybe if we switch back to 11 game seasons? I don't know.

Not enough football as is. No way we shorten the season.

Fenderbender123

No, I agree. That's why I said I don't know. Wasn't really a serious suggestion. Probably shouldn't have even typed it.

CaptainPJ

RhythmicSlappingDawg said:

Why the fuck is the guy who hired and still continues to employ Kliff Kingsbury ( The younger faggier Mike Leach), the leader of the committee that decides who the best four teams in the cuntry are?


Also, get Ty Willingham and Condy Rice off the fucking committee.

Tha fuck? Have you seen Kingbury’s moves (.gif)?!

And the fact that you didn’t put try at the front of that shooting gallery makes you’re poont mute, for all intensive purposes.

No go fuck off!!

SpoonieLuv

RhythmicSlappingDawg said:

Why the fuck is the guy who hired and still continues to employ Kliff Kingsbury ( The younger faggier Mike Leach), the leader of the committee that decides who the best four teams in the cuntry are?


Also, get Ty Willingham and Condy Rice off the fucking committee.

Pitchfork51

Who gives a fucking shit if it's too hard for the players.

One more game is fine.

Why the fuck have power 5 conferences with only 4 spots? It's Larry Scott stupid.

doogie

P-5+1 with the stooped committee choosing the seeding would have been better.

8 teams, best.

5 conference Champions, 2 at large from P5 conferences and 1 team from the Best of the Dreck

puppylove_sugarsteel

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

They have picked the four best teams every year.

According to a woman scholar? Fitting that statement came from you baaby