was apparently not required since ESPN and the SEC Network and the Big10 Network and every other "linear channel" were frantically covering signing day with a special emphasis of ignoring Pac12 teams naturally.
Therefore, THE Pac12 Networks determined they really didn't need to do anything but show some old Final Four games that involved teams that weren't in the Pac12 at the time they played in the Final Four. Makes perfect sense to Larry Scott and his innovative network, of course.
https://mercurynews.com/2017/12/21/if-you-missed-football-signing-day-well-so-did-the-pac-12-networks-what-happened-what-it-means-and-what-can-be-done/(Wilner) "...(signing day flips and wins)...Of course, you would not have known any of that based on the Pac-12 Networks’ coverage of signing day.
Make that: Based on the Pac-12 Networks’ confounding, inexplicable, lack of coverage of signing day.
There were plenty of replays of football and basketball games on the conference’s network Wednesday morning and afternoon.
There was even a replay of a 1998 Final Four game matching teams that weren’t members of the conference in 1998.
But football recruiting? Not a mention.
No interviews, no news flashes, no end-of-the-day recaps and breakdowns."
Comments
Or maybe they really are just so stupid that they didn't realize December 20th was the more significant LOI day. Considering they've always had wall-to-wall coverage of signing day in the past, there's a pretty good chance that this is the case.
At the end of the day, our brand fucking sucks and we're a second-rate conference.
They are simply asleep at the wheel.
Both are in their first year on the job.