Signees

2001400ex

Can someone put together a list of schools and how many commits signed compared to how many commits they have? Cause I'm lazy. And @Swaye I'll fuck this up and I'm not even good enough to be your apprentice, but here goes.

Swaye

You did not fuck this one up at all.

PineapplePirate

bananasnblondes

UW - 18 signed, 0 still looking around
WSU - 18 signed, 5 still looking
Oregon - 13 signed, 7 still looking
OSU - 11 signed, 0 still looking
Stanford - 10 signed, 3 still looking
Cal - 18 signed, 0 still looking
SC - 8 signed, 3 still looking
UCLA - 8 signed, 3 still looking
The rest - NOC

Swaye

bananasnblondes said:

UW - 18 signed, 0 still looking around
WSU - 18 signed, 5 still looking
Oregon - 13 signed, 7 still looking
OSU - 11 signed, 0 still looking
Stanford - 10 signed, 3 still looking
Cal - 18 signed, 0 still looking
SC - 8 signed, 3 still looking
UCLA - 8 signed, 3 still looking
The rest - NOC

This will be an important metric in future years I think. The teams that can nail down a relatively full class early are significantly advantaged from a resourcing perspective for both late onesie twosies in the current cycle and laying groundwork for the next cycle.

Cal and UW were far and away the best this year. I do think USC is sort of a special case in that they are playing a different higher end game where they think there is self interest in NOT filling their class early, to try and cherry pick 5 stars or whatever. But, for most all teams with the exception of the blue blood goliaths, getting a 95% class signed in December is a huge advantage. I think UW will always be near tops in the conference in this under Pete - and shows he understands how resourcing works and makes it a central focus of our efforts. Efficiency wins in almost all markets, and I doubt CFB is an exception.

In short, I have a big fat red boner.

biak1

I would have assumed Stanford would close all of their commits due to the nature and similarity of their program to Pete’s.

USC and UCLA will almost always play the waiting game because they can afford to Bruce Wayne it and dick over the rest of the PAC schools.

YellowSnow

Swaye said:

bananasnblondes said:

UW - 18 signed, 0 still looking around
WSU - 18 signed, 5 still looking
Oregon - 13 signed, 7 still looking
OSU - 11 signed, 0 still looking
Stanford - 10 signed, 3 still looking
Cal - 18 signed, 0 still looking
SC - 8 signed, 3 still looking
UCLA - 8 signed, 3 still looking
The rest - NOC

This will be an important metric in future years I think. The teams that can nail down a relatively full class early are significantly advantaged from a resourcing perspective for both late onesie twosies in the current cycle and laying groundwork for the next cycle.

Cal and UW were far and away the best this year. I do think USC is sort of a special case in that they are playing a different higher end game where they think there is self interest in NOT filling their class early, to try and cherry pick 5 stars or whatever. But, for most all teams with the exception of the blue blood goliaths, getting a 95% class signed in December is a huge advantage. I think UW will always be near tops in the conference in this under Pete - and shows he understands how resourcing works and makes it a central focus of our efforts. Efficiency wins in almost all markets, and I doubt CFB is an exception.

In short, I have a big fat short red boner.

Sorry @dnc

Swaye

YellowSnow said:

Swaye said:

bananasnblondes said:

UW - 18 signed, 0 still looking around
WSU - 18 signed, 5 still looking
Oregon - 13 signed, 7 still looking
OSU - 11 signed, 0 still looking
Stanford - 10 signed, 3 still looking
Cal - 18 signed, 0 still looking
SC - 8 signed, 3 still looking
UCLA - 8 signed, 3 still looking
The rest - NOC

This will be an important metric in future years I think. The teams that can nail down a relatively full class early are significantly advantaged from a resourcing perspective for both late onesie twosies in the current cycle and laying groundwork for the next cycle.

Cal and UW were far and away the best this year. I do think USC is sort of a special case in that they are playing a different higher end game where they think there is self interest in NOT filling their class early, to try and cherry pick 5 stars or whatever. But, for most all teams with the exception of the blue blood goliaths, getting a 95% class signed in December is a huge advantage. I think UW will always be near tops in the conference in this under Pete - and shows he understands how resourcing works and makes it a central focus of our efforts. Efficiency wins in almost all markets, and I doubt CFB is an exception.

In short, I have a big fat short red boner.

Sorry @dnc

He loves me for who I am.

2001400ex

bananasnblondes said:

UW - 18 signed, 0 still looking around
WSU - 18 signed, 5 still looking
Oregon - 13 signed, 7 still looking
OSU - 11 signed, 0 still looking
Stanford - 10 signed, 3 still looking
Cal - 18 signed, 0 still looking
SC - 8 signed, 3 still looking
UCLA - 8 signed, 3 still looking
The rest - NOC

Nice work!!!


Cal still too high. Oh wait.

UWhuskytskeet

biak1 said:

I would have assumed Stanford would close all of their commits due to the nature and similarity of their program to Pete’s.

USC and UCLA will almost always play the waiting game because they can afford to Bruce Wayne it and dick over the rest of the PAC schools.

I might be misremembering, but I think Stanford doesn't get their admissions process completely finished until late December or even January. Some kids may still be waiting.

bananasnblondes

The February scramble between SC, UCLA, Bama, tOSU, etc. for the remaining attention- whore recruits will be fun to watch. It will be like 1:45 at the bar and the hot chick hasn't gone home with anyone yet.