And why do we have to believe a woman just because she makes a charge? Are we pretending that most women aren't lying cunts? Did I write that or just think it?
Reggie Love said Obama sucked his dick for coke and he served 8 years.
> @RaceBannon said: > He isn’t gone. > > this is true > > And why do we have to believe a woman just because she makes a charge? Are we pretending that most women aren't lying cunts? Did I write that or just think it? > > Reggie Love said Obama sucked his dick for coke and he served 8 years.
I agree. I don't think the lying cunts part is necessary and I think it's more all human beings are pieces of shit than women specifically.
Lebatard read an interaction Dustin Hoffman had with John Oliver about the accusations against Hoffman and Oliver defends the women and insists they are telling the truth because they "have nothing to gain" but since fucking when do people need something to gain to lie? If that's your standard, if you're just going to believe anything someone says if you believe they have nothing to gain you're a sucker. It's also ignoring the fact that we've created something for them to gain. It's attention and applause. You're a hero now for accusing someone.
I don't know how we sort through it. The amount of accusers and severity of the accusations seems like our best bet but there's a reason the justice system has problems dealing with this. Part of it is the way we view women. Not just men but the way other women view women. And there are examples of gross rape trials where lawyers do ugly things like show that the woman made a sex joke on Facebook therefore she couldn't have been raped. But the real problem is it's he said/she said. If we default to she is telling the truth no matter what a lot of innocent men will get buried. The hard answer is we have to go case by case and beyond a reasonable doubt has to be the measurement. There's a reason we use that in our justice system. It means men that do horrible things will get away with it but it's the closest we can get to fair.
And on a related note, if you are dismissing accusations because it happened a long time ago you are every bit as stupid as the other side. If you are playing partisan politics on whom you choose to believe is innocent and not you are an Art Briles level scumbag. And I'd say I'll see you in hell but I never want to see you again.
> And why do we have to believe a woman just because she makes a charge? Are we pretending that most women aren't lying cunts? Did I write that or just think it?
>
> Reggie Love said Obama sucked his dick for coke and he served 8 years.
I agree. I don't think the lying cunts part is necessary and I think it's more all human beings are pieces of shit than women specifically.
Lebatard read an interaction Dustin Hoffman had with John Oliver about the accusations against Hoffman and Oliver defends the women and insists they are telling the truth because they "have nothing to gain" but since fucking when do people need something to gain to lie? If that's your standard, if you're just going to believe anything someone says if you believe they have nothing to gain you're a sucker. It's also ignoring the fact that we've created something for them to gain. It's attention and applause. You're a hero now for accusing someone.
I don't know how we sort through it. The amount of accusers and severity of the accusations seems like our best bet but there's a reason the justice system has problems dealing with this. Part of it is the way we view women. Not just men but the way other women view women. And there are examples of gross rape trials where lawyers do ugly things like show that the woman made a sex joke on Facebook therefore she couldn't have been raped. But the real problem is it's he said/she said. If we default to she is telling the truth no matter what a lot of innocent men will get buried. The hard answer is we have to go case by case and beyond a reasonable doubt has to be the measurement. There's a reason we use that in our justice system. It means men that do horrible things will get away with it but it's the closest we can get to fair.
And on a related note, if you are dismissing accusations because it happened a long time ago you are every bit as stupid as the other side. If you are playing partisan politics on whom you choose to believe is innocent and not you are an Art Briles level scumbag. And I'd say I'll see you in hell but I never want to see you again.
APAG has the best summary of the situation once again.
Reasonable doubt and trials in the court of public opinion is good enough for now. The end justifies the means. These sexual scandals are bringing down the whole rotten edifice that is the US power structure. Removing as many politicians, media apparatchiks, and the so called cultural elite from positions of power while we can is good for the country. We can hold ourself to a higher standard after the country has been cleansed of the corrupt filth running it.
> And why do we have to believe a woman just because she makes a charge? Are we pretending that most women aren't lying cunts? Did I write that or just think it?
>
> Reggie Love said Obama sucked his dick for coke and he served 8 years.
I agree. I don't think the lying cunts part is necessary and I think it's more all human beings are pieces of shit than women specifically.
Lebatard read an interaction Dustin Hoffman had with John Oliver about the accusations against Hoffman and Oliver defends the women and insists they are telling the truth because they "have nothing to gain" but since fucking when do people need something to gain to lie? If that's your standard, if you're just going to believe anything someone says if you believe they have nothing to gain you're a sucker. It's also ignoring the fact that we've created something for them to gain. It's attention and applause. You're a hero now for accusing someone.
I don't know how we sort through it. The amount of accusers and severity of the accusations seems like our best bet but there's a reason the justice system has problems dealing with this. Part of it is the way we view women. Not just men but the way other women view women. And there are examples of gross rape trials where lawyers do ugly things like show that the woman made a sex joke on Facebook therefore she couldn't have been raped. But the real problem is it's he said/she said. If we default to she is telling the truth no matter what a lot of innocent men will get buried. The hard answer is we have to go case by case and beyond a reasonable doubt has to be the measurement. There's a reason we use that in our justice system. It means men that do horrible things will get away with it but it's the closest we can get to fair.
And on a related note, if you are dismissing accusations because it happened a long time ago you are every bit as stupid as the other side. If you are playing partisan politics on whom you choose to believe is innocent and not you are an Art Briles level scumbag. And I'd say I'll see you in hell but I never want to see you again.
The cunt shot was out of line.
Being old I have been tempted to be skeptical of why it took so long for women to come out because in my mind this has been an issue since the 80's and I think, well, gosh there has been support for women coming forward for a long time.
BUT even after all these years and over those years, most of them got savaged when they did.
another option Race given your track record. Maybe these aren’t your thoughts at all and you’re just plagerism someone else’s shit like some sick fucko
> @oregonblitzkrieg said: > Reasonable doubt and trials in the court of public opinion is good enough for now. The end justifies the means. These sexual scandals are bringing down the whole rotten edifice that is the US power structure. Removing as many politicians, media apparatchiks, and the so called cultural elite from positions of power while we can is good for the country. We can hold ourself to a higher standard after the country has been cleansed of the corrupt filth running it.
> Reasonable doubt and trials in the court of public opinion is good enough for now. The end justifies the means. These sexual scandals are bringing down the whole rotten edifice that is the US power structure. Removing as many politicians, media apparatchiks, and the so called cultural elite from positions of power while we can is good for the country. We can hold ourself to a higher standard after the country has been cleansed of the corrupt filth running it.
Except Moore. Must still vote for Moore.
Moore is a liability for the other corrupt party in Washington. I don't understand why they're tethering themselves to his sinking ship. Also, learn how to use the quote feature dumbass.
> Reasonable doubt and trials in the court of public opinion is good enough for now. The end justifies the means. These sexual scandals are bringing down the whole rotten edifice that is the US power structure. Removing as many politicians, media apparatchiks, and the so called cultural elite from positions of power while we can is good for the country. We can hold ourself to a higher standard after the country has been cleansed of the corrupt filth running it.
Except Moore. Must still vote for Moore.
There's pics of Franken in the act, got any of Moore?
> @Sledog said: > > @oregonblitzkrieg said: > > > Reasonable doubt and trials in the court of public opinion is good enough for now. The end justifies the means. These sexual scandals are bringing down the whole rotten edifice that is the US power structure. Removing as many politicians, media apparatchiks, and the so called cultural elite from positions of power while we can is good for the country. We can hold ourself to a higher standard after the country has been cleansed of the corrupt filth running it. > > > > Except Moore. Must still vote for Moore. > > There's pics of Franken in the act, got any of Moore?
No woman was ever sexually assaulted before the invention of the camera.
Reasonable doubt and trials in the court of public opinion is good enough for now. The end justifies the means. These sexual scandals are bringing down the whole rotten edifice that is the US power structure. Removing as many politicians, media apparatchiks, and the so called cultural elite from positions of power while we can is good for the country. We can hold ourself to a higher standard after the country has been cleansed of the corrupt filth running it.
> @TierbsHsotBoobs said: > Reasonable doubt and trials in the court of public opinion is good enough for now. The end justifies the means. These sexual scandals are bringing down the whole rotten edifice that is the US power structure. Removing as many politicians, media apparatchiks, and the so called cultural elite from positions of power while we can is good for the country. We can hold ourself to a higher standard after the country has been cleansed of the corrupt filth running it. > > Helps Trump IMO
> Reasonable doubt and trials in the court of public opinion is good enough for now. The end justifies the means. These sexual scandals are bringing down the whole rotten edifice that is the US power structure. Removing as many politicians, media apparatchiks, and the so called cultural elite from positions of power while we can is good for the country. We can hold ourself to a higher standard after the country has been cleansed of the corrupt filth running it.
>
> Helps Trump IMO
Poast mor
36,861 posts aren't enough for you? Look up DeerGnorst if that isn't enough. 100K worth of absolute gems.
> Reasonable doubt and trials in the court of public opinion is good enough for now. The end justifies the means. These sexual scandals are bringing down the whole rotten edifice that is the US power structure. Removing as many politicians, media apparatchiks, and the so called cultural elite from positions of power while we can is good for the country. We can hold ourself to a higher standard after the country has been cleansed of the corrupt filth running it.
>
> Helps Trump IMO
Poast mor
36,861 posts aren't enough for you? Look up DeerGnorst if that isn't enough. 100K worth of absolute gems.
> > Reasonable doubt and trials in the court of public opinion is good enough for now. The end justifies the means. These sexual scandals are bringing down the whole rotten edifice that is the US power structure. Removing as many politicians, media apparatchiks, and the so called cultural elite from positions of power while we can is good for the country. We can hold ourself to a higher standard after the country has been cleansed of the corrupt filth running it.
>
>
>
> Except Moore. Must still vote for Moore.
>
> There's pics of Franken in the act, got any of Moore?
No woman was ever sexually assaulted before the invention of the camera.
> > Reasonable doubt and trials in the court of public opinion is good enough for now. The end justifies the means. These sexual scandals are bringing down the whole rotten edifice that is the US power structure. Removing as many politicians, media apparatchiks, and the so called cultural elite from positions of power while we can is good for the country. We can hold ourself to a higher standard after the country has been cleansed of the corrupt filth running it.
>
>
>
> Except Moore. Must still vote for Moore.
>
> There's pics of Franken in the act, got any of Moore?
No woman was ever sexually assaulted before the invention of the camera.
Comments
And why do we have to believe a woman just because she makes a charge? Are we pretending that most women aren't lying cunts? Did I write that or just think it?
Reggie Love said Obama sucked his dick for coke and he served 8 years.
> He isn’t gone.
>
> this is true
>
> And why do we have to believe a woman just because she makes a charge? Are we pretending that most women aren't lying cunts? Did I write that or just think it?
>
> Reggie Love said Obama sucked his dick for coke and he served 8 years.
I agree. I don't think the lying cunts part is necessary and I think it's more all human beings are pieces of shit than women specifically.
Lebatard read an interaction Dustin Hoffman had with John Oliver about the accusations against Hoffman and Oliver defends the women and insists they are telling the truth because they "have nothing to gain" but since fucking when do people need something to gain to lie? If that's your standard, if you're just going to believe anything someone says if you believe they have nothing to gain you're a sucker. It's also ignoring the fact that we've created something for them to gain. It's attention and applause. You're a hero now for accusing someone.
I don't know how we sort through it. The amount of accusers and severity of the accusations seems like our best bet but there's a reason the justice system has problems dealing with this. Part of it is the way we view women. Not just men but the way other women view women. And there are examples of gross rape trials where lawyers do ugly things like show that the woman made a sex joke on Facebook therefore she couldn't have been raped. But the real problem is it's he said/she said. If we default to she is telling the truth no matter what a lot of innocent men will get buried. The hard answer is we have to go case by case and beyond a reasonable doubt has to be the measurement. There's a reason we use that in our justice system. It means men that do horrible things will get away with it but it's the closest we can get to fair.
And on a related note, if you are dismissing accusations because it happened a long time ago you are every bit as stupid as the other side. If you are playing partisan politics on whom you choose to believe is innocent and not you are an Art Briles level scumbag. And I'd say I'll see you in hell but I never want to see you again.
Kudos.
Being old I have been tempted to be skeptical of why it took so long for women to come out because in my mind this has been an issue since the 80's and I think, well, gosh there has been support for women coming forward for a long time.
BUT even after all these years and over those years, most of them got savaged when they did.
Good points.
> Reasonable doubt and trials in the court of public opinion is good enough for now. The end justifies the means. These sexual scandals are bringing down the whole rotten edifice that is the US power structure. Removing as many politicians, media apparatchiks, and the so called cultural elite from positions of power while we can is good for the country. We can hold ourself to a higher standard after the country has been cleansed of the corrupt filth running it.
Except Moore. Must still vote for Moore.
> > @oregonblitzkrieg said:
>
> > Reasonable doubt and trials in the court of public opinion is good enough for now. The end justifies the means. These sexual scandals are bringing down the whole rotten edifice that is the US power structure. Removing as many politicians, media apparatchiks, and the so called cultural elite from positions of power while we can is good for the country. We can hold ourself to a higher standard after the country has been cleansed of the corrupt filth running it.
>
>
>
> Except Moore. Must still vote for Moore.
>
> There's pics of Franken in the act, got any of Moore?
No woman was ever sexually assaulted before the invention of the camera.
#SleDoogFS
> Reasonable doubt and trials in the court of public opinion is good enough for now. The end justifies the means. These sexual scandals are bringing down the whole rotten edifice that is the US power structure. Removing as many politicians, media apparatchiks, and the so called cultural elite from positions of power while we can is good for the country. We can hold ourself to a higher standard after the country has been cleansed of the corrupt filth running it.
>
> Helps Trump IMO
Poast mor
https://twitter.com/reedstrong7
Fuck.