OFFICIAL Huskies-Cougars Game Thread
Comments
-
PurpleBaze said:
He wasn't punching for the football.
You don't know that . - Cuog.
Having said that - that is what desperation looks like.
-
could be a snap hook here
-
Normally I would agree, but these Wazzu players are so shit at everything he genuinely might not have known the play was over...PurpleBaze said:He wasn't punching for the football.
-
Desperation is a stinky cologne.
-
More education for your fucktarded ass:BallzDeep said:
No they don't. South games have no bearing on who wins the North.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Holy fuck you are retarded.BallzDeep said:
South division games don't matter. Like I said both teams have one North division loss. Head-to-head tie breaker is stupid. So Stanford could have beaten WSU but lost to Oregon State one of the worst teams in the country but as long as they beat UW they're in. If you have two teams that are 4-1 you should judge them by their loss because that encapsulates the two team's performances against the entire division instead of their performance in just one division game.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
It's hard:BallzDeep said:Seriously annoying we can't clinch the North after this epic ass kicking. UW, Stanford, and WSU all have a loss to a North division opponent. So the North champion should be the team that lost to the highest ranked North team in the final standings which would be UW. So what the fuck? UW lost to Stanford but Stanford lost to WSU. WSU will finish lower in the division standings than Stanford. Stanford's loss is worse. This is stupid.
Stanford 7-2
Washington 7-2
Washington State 6-3
All nine conference games matter.
Go back to Doogman where you belong.
A series of tiebreakers are used to determine which two teams match up in the Pac-12 Football Championship Game. Final standings in each division are ordered top to bottom (with the top team in each division playing for the title) based on the following criteria:
Conference winning percentage
Number of conference wins
Two-team ties
If two teams are tied for a division championship, head-to-head results between those two teams are used as a tiebreaker to decide who participates in the Football Championship Game.
http://pac-12.com/article/2014/11/06/pac-12-football-championship-game-tiebreaker-explanation -
2 for fuckin' 2.
-
Okay, that made me chuckle.NorwegianHusky said:
Normally I would agree, but these Wazzu players are so shit at everything he genuinely might not have known the play was over...PurpleBaze said:He wasn't punching for the football.
-
Cuog tears are delicious.
If they keep cheap shotting someone better knock a gray fuck out Blount style. -
ignore him like everyone else dudeTierbsHsotBoobs said:
More education for your fucktarded ass:BallzDeep said:
No they don't. South games have no bearing on who wins the North.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Holy fuck you are retarded.BallzDeep said:
South division games don't matter. Like I said both teams have one North division loss. Head-to-head tie breaker is stupid. So Stanford could have beaten WSU but lost to Oregon State one of the worst teams in the country but as long as they beat UW they're in. If you have two teams that are 4-1 you should judge them by their loss because that encapsulates the two team's performances against the entire division instead of their performance in just one division game.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
It's hard:BallzDeep said:Seriously annoying we can't clinch the North after this epic ass kicking. UW, Stanford, and WSU all have a loss to a North division opponent. So the North champion should be the team that lost to the highest ranked North team in the final standings which would be UW. So what the fuck? UW lost to Stanford but Stanford lost to WSU. WSU will finish lower in the division standings than Stanford. Stanford's loss is worse. This is stupid.
Stanford 7-2
Washington 7-2
Washington State 6-3
All nine conference games matter.
Go back to Doogman where you belong.
A series of tiebreakers are used to determine which two teams match up in the Pac-12 Football Championship Game. Final standings in each division are ordered top to bottom (with the top team in each division playing for the title) based on the following criteria:
Conference winning percentage
Number of conference wins
Two-team ties
If two teams are tied for a division championship, head-to-head results between those two teams are used as a tiebreaker to decide who participates in the Football Championship Game.
http://pac-12.com/article/2014/11/06/pac-12-football-championship-game-tiebreaker-explanation -
So let's play this out.....................You go 4-1 in the north, and winless in the south, so you should represent the north in the title game b/c you beat OSU/Wazzu/Oregon/Cal and lose to stanford?BallzDeep said:
No they don't. South games have no bearing on who wins the North.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Holy fuck you are retarded.BallzDeep said:
South division games don't matter. Like I said both teams have one North division loss. Head-to-head tie breaker is stupid. So Stanford could have beaten WSU but lost to Oregon State one of the worst teams in the country but as long as they beat UW they're in. If you have two teams that are 4-1 you should judge them by their loss because that encapsulates the two team's performances against the entire division instead of their performance in just one division game.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
It's hard:BallzDeep said:Seriously annoying we can't clinch the North after this epic ass kicking. UW, Stanford, and WSU all have a loss to a North division opponent. So the North champion should be the team that lost to the highest ranked North team in the final standings which would be UW. So what the fuck? UW lost to Stanford but Stanford lost to WSU. WSU will finish lower in the division standings than Stanford. Stanford's loss is worse. This is stupid.
Stanford 7-2
Washington 7-2
Washington State 6-3
All nine conference games matter.
Go back to Doogman where you belong.
God that is fucking laughable beyond DM.C. Ruth, put down the keyboard and step back into Kems underpants. -
There's only one thing worse and gayer than the cuogs, and that is brady Quinn.
-
You're a special kind of fucktardBallzDeep said:
No they don't. South games have no bearing on who wins the North.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Holy fuck you are retarded.BallzDeep said:
South division games don't matter. Like I said both teams have one North division loss. Head-to-head tie breaker is stupid. So Stanford could have beaten WSU but lost to Oregon State one of the worst teams in the country but as long as they beat UW they're in. If you have two teams that are 4-1 you should judge them by their loss because that encapsulates the two team's performances against the entire division instead of their performance in just one division game.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
It's hard:BallzDeep said:Seriously annoying we can't clinch the North after this epic ass kicking. UW, Stanford, and WSU all have a loss to a North division opponent. So the North champion should be the team that lost to the highest ranked North team in the final standings which would be UW. So what the fuck? UW lost to Stanford but Stanford lost to WSU. WSU will finish lower in the division standings than Stanford. Stanford's loss is worse. This is stupid.
Stanford 7-2
Washington 7-2
Washington State 6-3
All nine conference games matter.
Go back to Doogman where you belong.
-
These fuckers better hold onto this shutout. . .
-
Done.Gladstone said:
ignore him like everyone else dudeTierbsHsotBoobs said:
More education for your fucktarded ass:BallzDeep said:
No they don't. South games have no bearing on who wins the North.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Holy fuck you are retarded.BallzDeep said:
South division games don't matter. Like I said both teams have one North division loss. Head-to-head tie breaker is stupid. So Stanford could have beaten WSU but lost to Oregon State one of the worst teams in the country but as long as they beat UW they're in. If you have two teams that are 4-1 you should judge them by their loss because that encapsulates the two team's performances against the entire division instead of their performance in just one division game.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
It's hard:BallzDeep said:Seriously annoying we can't clinch the North after this epic ass kicking. UW, Stanford, and WSU all have a loss to a North division opponent. So the North champion should be the team that lost to the highest ranked North team in the final standings which would be UW. So what the fuck? UW lost to Stanford but Stanford lost to WSU. WSU will finish lower in the division standings than Stanford. Stanford's loss is worse. This is stupid.
Stanford 7-2
Washington 7-2
Washington State 6-3
All nine conference games matter.
Go back to Doogman where you belong.
A series of tiebreakers are used to determine which two teams match up in the Pac-12 Football Championship Game. Final standings in each division are ordered top to bottom (with the top team in each division playing for the title) based on the following criteria:
Conference winning percentage
Number of conference wins
Two-team ties
If two teams are tied for a division championship, head-to-head results between those two teams are used as a tiebreaker to decide who participates in the Football Championship Game.
http://pac-12.com/article/2014/11/06/pac-12-football-championship-game-tiebreaker-explanation -
Brady Quin and Tinfoil South
-
Beating up retards part of what made this bored what it is
-
Should have told him to take a seat
-
Please let this be a Harv alt.BallzDeep said:
Under the current rules if a North team gets beat by every South division opponent they play but beats every other North team that team wins the North division. Those are the fucking rules bitch. Sorry you're fucking dumb and didn't know that.FreeChavez said:
So let's play this out.....................You go 4-1 in the north, and winless in the south, so you should represent the north in the title game b/c you beat OSU/Wazzu/Oregon/Cal and lose to stanford?BallzDeep said:
No they don't. South games have no bearing on who wins the North.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Holy fuck you are retarded.BallzDeep said:
South division games don't matter. Like I said both teams have one North division loss. Head-to-head tie breaker is stupid. So Stanford could have beaten WSU but lost to Oregon State one of the worst teams in the country but as long as they beat UW they're in. If you have two teams that are 4-1 you should judge them by their loss because that encapsulates the two team's performances against the entire division instead of their performance in just one division game.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
It's hard:BallzDeep said:Seriously annoying we can't clinch the North after this epic ass kicking. UW, Stanford, and WSU all have a loss to a North division opponent. So the North champion should be the team that lost to the highest ranked North team in the final standings which would be UW. So what the fuck? UW lost to Stanford but Stanford lost to WSU. WSU will finish lower in the division standings than Stanford. Stanford's loss is worse. This is stupid.
Stanford 7-2
Washington 7-2
Washington State 6-3
All nine conference games matter.
Go back to Doogman where you belong.
God that is fucking laughable beyond DM.C. Ruth, put down the keyboard and step back into Kems underpants. -
Looks like his teammates really like Burr-Kirven. Must be a crazy fucker.
-
If two teams are tied for a division championship, head-to-head results between those two teams are used as a tiebreaker to decide who participates in the Football Championship
Anyone with a competitive bone in their body can't complain about having a chance h2h on the field and the winner moves on. NOBODY. Unless of course you're still looking for a participation ribbon for posting on HHH.
-
jesdsdud. gaskin ran right past browning
-
Holy hell
-
GAME OVER!!
-
Touchdown Gaskin. ThT guy ever stops moving his legs.
-
But how is gaskin a total superstar?
-
LOL @ Triscut
-
The cougs suck
-
Remember that time Washington only gave the RBs 21 carries at Arizona State?
-
LMAO @ myles running straight past Jake trying to celebrate with him
-
Gaskin just ran right past Jake and left him hanging on his way to celebrate with the bench.
