Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Want Sark fired?
[Deleted User]
Posts: 11,453
Bribe some Joey's slut to spill the beans about Sark. Once one comes out, another will come out then a bunch will come out to spill the beans.
In PC Seattle he could go 10-3 and he'd lose his job for that. Don't waste your time emailing Pool Boy or President Young(unless it's Lemon Party) as they won't read our emails anyways.
Email the donors as their voice is the only voice that matters. Watching this WSU game it's looking like it will be a 7-5 season as the Cougs won't even have the opportunity to play for a bowl.
In PC Seattle he could go 10-3 and he'd lose his job for that. Don't waste your time emailing Pool Boy or President Young(unless it's Lemon Party) as they won't read our emails anyways.
Email the donors as their voice is the only voice that matters. Watching this WSU game it's looking like it will be a 7-5 season as the Cougs won't even have the opportunity to play for a bowl.
Comments
-
She blew him out behind the dumpsters every Tuesday after closing - that nice added touch.
-
All it takes is for one of his hoes on the side to come clean then the rest will follow that's how it always goes.
In Seattle no way a coach would ever survive a "Cheating on his wife" scandal. -
There's no way any of that stuff comes out publicly as long as Sark is doing the right things ...
There's also no way that that stuff isn't used against him behind closed doors for leverage as needed whether it is tied to coaching changes, buyouts, etc.
The only way that any of that comes out full blown publicly is if the UW needs a good reason to support their firing. See Slick and his better on the NCAA Tournament as an example.
There's enough smoke out there right now that any investigative reporter worthy of their degree from WSU could go digging around and get something to run a story on. -
Agree Tequila - but there is no money in investigative journalism anymore
BTW, please nix that faggot avatar -
My point is Tequila is if the Boosters are upset with his off the field running around they might put pressure on Pool Boy.
Now not all boosters care like Crocket but I'm sure there are some boosters who don't appreciate this frat boy running around going 7-6 every year.
I do think when Sark is fired you'll see Adam Jude or some other dickhead reporter "Break the News" a week later about Sark's off the field behavior. -
It's definitely possible ...
The impression I get (if Butler Cabin is any impression to go off of) is that most of the boosters are happy with the "inside access" that they have right now and their ability to hob knob isn't putting them in a position where they'd rather fire a guy potentially a year too early than a year too late.
7-5 probably keeps people around but there will be enough noise going around (particularly depending on how he loses those games) to start making things uncomfortable enough in the program that a change SHOULD be made ... the question will be whether or not they make the call on that a year too late. 6-6 and I think it's a fairly easy call. I worry about 8-4. 8-4 and we transition relatively easily into 10-3 next year. Everybody's happy while we go through a 10 year Tedford/Bellotti cycle where you have an average coach that somehow "lucks" his way into a good year here and there. What you most likely won't get is a coach that is ever elite in the conference - particularly given the $$$ that are in the conference for coaching. -
Mr. Jeremy stays ...
-
The impression I get (if Butler Cabin is any impression to go off of) is that most of the boosters are happy with the "inside access" that they have right now.
That is the most naive thing I've heard this week
Ron needs to go, final warning -
I agree, except don't send it to the boosters. Do you really think they don't fuck around on their wives? Most of them are already married to their previous mistress. You have to send it to the boosters' FIRST wives.
The problem with taking it public is that the next coach will be hired ONLY because he's a Choir Boy. Sweet Lou nailed it the day he got fired. He said, "I'll tell ya who they hire next; the direct opposite of me!" They did.
Remember the search committee hiring Thad "the fag" Turner because he told them he "only cares about the young men's collegiate experience, not winning and losing." The faggots from upper campus on the committee ate it up. We need to keep control of the situation within the AD, lest the faggots up the hill get involved.
Let Pool Boy keep control of the next hire. If he fucks up, his career is over.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=8BwvoxGATkU -
Some good posts by Tequilla....
I also worry about 8-4. The players will feel better after Colorado and have some momentum going into UCLA. While UCLA's future is much brighter they are dealing with some key injuries. As long as the offense isn't completely inept, Sankey and the defense will give them a chance in both road games. I wouldn't bet on a win in either game but I'd be somewhat surprised if we lost both.
However, in that scenario of 8-4 and 10-3, I think Sark tries to get another job. He knows he's in over his head now. He knows he's fucked up in-state recruiting. He's an opportunist. The worst case scenario is probably 8-5 then 9-5 next year, Sark can't get another job and then he gets fired most likely after 2016 and not 2015.
What we aren't looking at, as far as what will cause the dismissal is who pool boy thinks he can get. If he can't get Mora, which would be a splash hire, I bet he'd be very hesitant to can Sark. If he knows he can get Mora then the W/L is less relevant. He's a political animal. Firing Sark and hiring Mora would be great for pool boy. He'd look like a big-time AD to the media and public. However, firing Sark and having a drawn out process and ending up with your 4th choice and the reaction would be a guilty until proven innocent thing.




