Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

2019 Recruiting Bored (Updated 9/27/18)

2456

Comments

  • DawgWagonDan
    DawgWagonDan Member Posts: 789
    AIRWOLF said:

    I have created a table in Tableau with all known offers outstanding, per Rivals and 24/7. I grouped them by projected position for the Huskies, based on common sense. I included the three verbal commitments as well. There was one QB/Athlete that I removed from the list since he seems intent on playing QB and UW is done at that position.





    2019 Offers and Verbals by Projected Position (Sorted by 247 Composite Grade

    whats the total?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AIRWOLF
    AIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840
    DawgWagonDan said:

    AIRWOLF said:

    I have created a table in Tableau with all known offers outstanding, per Rivals and 24/7. I grouped them by projected position for the Huskies, based on common sense. I included the three verbal commitments as well. There was one QB/Athlete that I removed from the list since he seems intent on playing QB and UW is done at that position.





    2019 Offers and Verbals by Projected Position (Sorted by 247 Composite Grade

    whats the total?
    56 recruits on the list
    3 verbals
    53 outstanding offers that have not yet committed, by my count
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    AIRWOLF said:

    I have created a table in Tableau with all known offers outstanding, per Rivals and 24/7. I grouped them by projected position for the Huskies, based on common sense. I included the three verbal commitments as well. There was one QB/Athlete that I removed from the list since he seems intent on playing QB and UW is done at that position.





    2019 Offers and Verbals by Projected Position (Sorted by 247 Composite Grade

    How much free time do you have on hand?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    edited February 2018
    AIRWOLF said:

    WeakarmCobra said:

    AIRWOLF said:

    I have created a table in Tableau with all known offers outstanding, per Rivals and 24/7. I grouped them by projected position for the Huskies, based on common sense. I included the three verbal commitments as well. There was one QB/Athlete that I removed from the list since he seems intent on playing QB and UW is done at that position.





    2019 Offers and Verbals by Projected Position (Sorted by 247 Composite Grade

    How much free time do you have on hand?
    A significant amount. It is good to be comfortably retired.
    I though u were still flying shit around. Make more dawg sense now that u in ur basement now
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AIRWOLF
    AIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840
    WeakarmCobra said:

    AIRWOLF said:

    WeakarmCobra said:

    AIRWOLF said:

    I have created a table in Tableau with all known offers outstanding, per Rivals and 24/7. I grouped them by projected position for the Huskies, based on common sense. I included the three verbal commitments as well. There was one QB/Athlete that I removed from the list since he seems intent on playing QB and UW is done at that position.





    2019 Offers and Verbals by Projected Position (Sorted by 247 Composite Grade

    How much free time do you have on hand?
    A significant amount. It is good to be comfortably retired.
    I though u were still flying shit around. Make more dawg sense now that u in ur basement now
    You might be mixing me up with somebody else. I haven't flown much since Archangel retired after Iran-Contra.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,081 Founders Club
    AIRWOLF said:

    WeakarmCobra said:

    AIRWOLF said:

    I have created a table in Tableau with all known offers outstanding, per Rivals and 24/7. I grouped them by projected position for the Huskies, based on common sense. I included the three verbal commitments as well. There was one QB/Athlete that I removed from the list since he seems intent on playing QB and UW is done at that position.





    2019 Offers and Verbals by Projected Position (Sorted by 247 Composite Grade

    How much free time do you have on hand?
    A significant amount. It is good to be comfortably retired.
    I thought you were doing a school project lol
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,081 Founders Club
    AIRWOLF said:

    AIRWOLF said:

    WeakarmCobra said:

    AIRWOLF said:

    I have created a table in Tableau with all known offers outstanding, per Rivals and 24/7. I grouped them by projected position for the Huskies, based on common sense. I included the three verbal commitments as well. There was one QB/Athlete that I removed from the list since he seems intent on playing QB and UW is done at that position.





    2019 Offers and Verbals by Projected Position (Sorted by 247 Composite Grade

    How much free time do you have on hand?
    A significant amount. It is good to be comfortably retired.
    This is bullshit, by the way. I am currently unemployed between jobs and am literally in my basement.
    Should have read farther or even further
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AIRWOLF
    AIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840
    RaceBannon said:

    AIRWOLF said:

    AIRWOLF said:

    WeakarmCobra said:

    AIRWOLF said:

    I have created a table in Tableau with all known offers outstanding, per Rivals and 24/7. I grouped them by projected position for the Huskies, based on common sense. I included the three verbal commitments as well. There was one QB/Athlete that I removed from the list since he seems intent on playing QB and UW is done at that position.





    2019 Offers and Verbals by Projected Position (Sorted by 247 Composite Grade

    How much free time do you have on hand?
    A significant amount. It is good to be comfortably retired.
    This is bullshit, by the way. I am currently unemployed between jobs and am literally in my basement.
    Should have read farther or even further
    Hey man, my basement is pretty nice. And sometimes my wife will even make me pizza rolls. I still have to launder my own sweatpants though. lol
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    edited February 2018
    AIRWOLF said:

    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    AIRWOLF said:

    I have created a table in Tableau with all known offers outstanding, per Rivals and 24/7. I grouped them by projected position for the Huskies, based on common sense. I included the three verbal commitments as well. There was one QB/Athlete that I removed from the list since he seems intent on playing QB and UW is done at that position.





    2019 Offers and Verbals by Projected Position (Sorted by 247 Composite Grade

    Pete really does hate WA
    It almost certainly has to do with evaluation timetables. And UW does have to get in the game earlier with out of state kids, particularly those outside of California and the PNW.

    But one does see how it could create the perception of a bias against locals.

    The other thing that I find amusing is the fact Petersen likes to make those snarky comments about recruiting star rankings being garbage, yet at least 42 of his 56 early offers are guys that carry 4- or 5-star early rankings. And most of the remainder are high 3-stars.
    Who will be this year's Dominique Hampton, low 3 star with high 4 star talent?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Neighbor2972
    Neighbor2972 Member Posts: 4,330
    dnc said:

    AIRWOLF said:

    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    AIRWOLF said:

    I have created a table in Tableau with all known offers outstanding, per Rivals and 24/7. I grouped them by projected position for the Huskies, based on common sense. I included the three verbal commitments as well. There was one QB/Athlete that I removed from the list since he seems intent on playing QB and UW is done at that position.





    2019 Offers and Verbals by Projected Position (Sorted by 247 Composite Grade

    Pete really does hate WA
    It almost certainly has to do with evaluation timetables. And UW does have to get in the game earlier with out of state kids, particularly those outside of California and the PNW.

    But one does see how it could create the perception of a bias against locals.

    The other thing that I find amusing is the fact Petersen likes to make those snarky comments about recruiting star rankings being garbage, yet at least 42 of his 56 early offers are guys that carry 4- or 5-star early rankings. And most of the remainder are high 3-stars.
    Who will be this year's Dominique Hampton, low 3 star with high 4 star talent?
    It's gonna be someone we haven't offered yet. Maybe Elder? I dont know about 4 star, but he certainly seems under recruited.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Dennis_DeYoung
    Dennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    AIRWOLF said:

    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    AIRWOLF said:

    I have created a table in Tableau with all known offers outstanding, per Rivals and 24/7. I grouped them by projected position for the Huskies, based on common sense. I included the three verbal commitments as well. There was one QB/Athlete that I removed from the list since he seems intent on playing QB and UW is done at that position.





    2019 Offers and Verbals by Projected Position (Sorted by 247 Composite Grade

    Pete really does hate WA
    It almost certainly has to do with evaluation timetables. And UW does have to get in the game earlier with out of state kids, particularly those outside of California and the PNW.

    But one does see how it could create the perception of a bias against locals.

    The other thing that I find amusing is the fact Petersen likes to make those snarky comments about recruiting star rankings being garbage, yet at least 42 of his 56 early offers are guys that carry 4- or 5-star early rankings. And most of the remainder are high 3-stars.
    Pete is full of shit on recruiting rankings. He had to be at Boise state and when you form an attitude that hard and publicly mock the obvious truth, it's hard to turn that shit around even when it is clear that you are wrong. You won't have to crane your neck in our society to see examples of this everywhere.

    If every college coach could have their first choice there would only be like 100 players selected total.

    There's a difference between there being a strong correlation between rankings and performance and a PERFECT correlation and Pete is as guilty as anyone at trying to poison our society with the notion than a non-perfect correlation is basically the same thing as no correlation.

    When "my friend" was banging Carol Shaeffer and her 38DDD boobs after school in 9th grade, it seemed a compelling argument that this was the optimal choice and boob size was the only TRUE important criteria upon which conquests could or should be measured.

    Until small-boobed (but way hotter) Bridget Perry gave a wink, then everyone was fucking falling all over themselves to learn the words to Bon Jovi songs and buy her pizza pockets.

    FLAG ME FUCK YOU.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    AIRWOLF said:

    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    AIRWOLF said:

    I have created a table in Tableau with all known offers outstanding, per Rivals and 24/7. I grouped them by projected position for the Huskies, based on common sense. I included the three verbal commitments as well. There was one QB/Athlete that I removed from the list since he seems intent on playing QB and UW is done at that position.





    2019 Offers and Verbals by Projected Position (Sorted by 247 Composite Grade

    Pete really does hate WA
    It almost certainly has to do with evaluation timetables. And UW does have to get in the game earlier with out of state kids, particularly those outside of California and the PNW.

    But one does see how it could create the perception of a bias against locals.

    The other thing that I find amusing is the fact Petersen likes to make those snarky comments about recruiting star rankings being garbage, yet at least 42 of his 56 early offers are guys that carry 4- or 5-star early rankings. And most of the remainder are high 3-stars.
    Pete is full of shit on recruiting rankings. He had to be at Boise state and when you form an attitude that hard and publicly mock the obvious truth, it's hard to turn that shit around even when it is clear that you are wrong. You won't have to crane your neck in our society to see examples of this everywhere.

    If every college coach could have their first choice there would only be like 100 players selected total.

    There's a difference between there being a strong correlation between rankings and performance and a PERFECT correlation and Pete is as guilty as anyone at trying to poison our society with the notion than a non-perfect correlation is basically the same thing as no correlation.

    When "my friend" was banging Carol Shaeffer and her 38DDD boobs after school in 9th grade, it seemed a compelling argument that this was the optimal choice and boob size was the only TRUE important criteria upon which conquests could or should be measured.

    Until small-boobed (but way hotter) Bridget Perry gave a wink, then everyone was fucking falling all over themselves to learn the words to Bon Jovi songs and buy her pizza pockets.

    FLAG ME FUCK YOU.
    Had to be done
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AIRWOLF
    AIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840
    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    AIRWOLF said:

    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    AIRWOLF said:

    I have created a table in Tableau with all known offers outstanding, per Rivals and 24/7. I grouped them by projected position for the Huskies, based on common sense. I included the three verbal commitments as well. There was one QB/Athlete that I removed from the list since he seems intent on playing QB and UW is done at that position.





    2019 Offers and Verbals by Projected Position (Sorted by 247 Composite Grade

    Pete really does hate WA
    It almost certainly has to do with evaluation timetables. And UW does have to get in the game earlier with out of state kids, particularly those outside of California and the PNW.

    But one does see how it could create the perception of a bias against locals.

    The other thing that I find amusing is the fact Petersen likes to make those snarky comments about recruiting star rankings being garbage, yet at least 42 of his 56 early offers are guys that carry 4- or 5-star early rankings. And most of the remainder are high 3-stars.
    Pete is full of shit on recruiting rankings. He had to be at Boise state and when you form an attitude that hard and publicly mock the obvious truth, it's hard to turn that shit around even when it is clear that you are wrong. You won't have to crane your neck in our society to see examples of this everywhere.

    If every college coach could have their first choice there would only be like 100 players selected total.

    There's a difference between there being a strong correlation between rankings and performance and a PERFECT correlation and Pete is as guilty as anyone at trying to poison our society with the notion than a non-perfect correlation is basically the same thing as no correlation.
    The top 1% or so of players are so easy to identify even Eklund could do it. I do give Petersen some real credit for being able to identify and project long term potential a lot better than most coaches.

    But the narrative that recruiting rankings are meaningless is reflexive BS.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,180 Founders Club
    AIRWOLF said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    AIRWOLF said:

    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    AIRWOLF said:

    I have created a table in Tableau with all known offers outstanding, per Rivals and 24/7. I grouped them by projected position for the Huskies, based on common sense. I included the three verbal commitments as well. There was one QB/Athlete that I removed from the list since he seems intent on playing QB and UW is done at that position.





    2019 Offers and Verbals by Projected Position (Sorted by 247 Composite Grade

    Pete really does hate WA
    It almost certainly has to do with evaluation timetables. And UW does have to get in the game earlier with out of state kids, particularly those outside of California and the PNW.

    But one does see how it could create the perception of a bias against locals.

    The other thing that I find amusing is the fact Petersen likes to make those snarky comments about recruiting star rankings being garbage, yet at least 42 of his 56 early offers are guys that carry 4- or 5-star early rankings. And most of the remainder are high 3-stars.
    Pete is full of shit on recruiting rankings. He had to be at Boise state and when you form an attitude that hard and publicly mock the obvious truth, it's hard to turn that shit around even when it is clear that you are wrong. You won't have to crane your neck in our society to see examples of this everywhere.

    If every college coach could have their first choice there would only be like 100 players selected total.

    There's a difference between there being a strong correlation between rankings and performance and a PERFECT correlation and Pete is as guilty as anyone at trying to poison our society with the notion than a non-perfect correlation is basically the same thing as no correlation.
    The top 1% or so of players are so easy to identify even Eklund could do it. I do give Petersen some real credit for being able to identify and project long term potential a lot better than most coaches.

    But the narrative that recruiting rankings are meaningless is reflexive BS.

    There's definitely plenty of "noise" in the data and unseen variables but the correlation is there.

    Heh, this stuff is way more reliable than economic data I do work with and we make way more important decisions based on that.

    Recruiting rankings >>> The dismal science
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheHB
    TheHB Member Posts: 6,457
    FremontTroll said:

    AIRWOLF said:

    WeakarmCobra said:

    AIRWOLF said:

    WeakarmCobra said:

    AIRWOLF said:

    I have created a table in Tableau with all known offers outstanding, per Rivals and 24/7. I grouped them by projected position for the Huskies, based on common sense. I included the three verbal commitments as well. There was one QB/Athlete that I removed from the list since he seems intent on playing QB and UW is done at that position.





    2019 Offers and Verbals by Projected Position (Sorted by 247 Composite Grade

    How much free time do you have on hand?
    A significant amount. It is good to be comfortably retired.
    I though u were still flying shit around. Make more dawg sense now that u in ur basement now
    You might be mixing me up with somebody else. I haven't flown much since Archangel retired after Iran-Contra.
    It is hard with multiple posters gender identifying as attack helicopters.
    Totally.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam
    dnc said:

    haie said:

    Did we tell his hs coach to fuck off yet?

    Not everyone kicks ass like @jamesosborne1959
    I'd like to see this get more use around here.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    AIRWOLF said:

    I have created a table in Tableau with all known offers outstanding, per Rivals and 24/7. I grouped them by projected position for the Huskies, based on common sense. I included the three verbal commitments as well. There was one QB/Athlete that I removed from the list since he seems intent on playing QB and UW is done at that position.





    2019 Offers and Verbals by Projected Position (Sorted by 247 Composite Grade

    Pete really does hate WASHINGTON, dammit
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AIRWOLF
    AIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840
    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    AIRWOLF said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    AIRWOLF said:

    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    AIRWOLF said:

    I have created a table in Tableau with all known offers outstanding, per Rivals and 24/7. I grouped them by projected position for the Huskies, based on common sense. I included the three verbal commitments as well. There was one QB/Athlete that I removed from the list since he seems intent on playing QB and UW is done at that position.





    2019 Offers and Verbals by Projected Position (Sorted by 247 Composite Grade

    Pete really does hate WA
    It almost certainly has to do with evaluation timetables. And UW does have to get in the game earlier with out of state kids, particularly those outside of California and the PNW.

    But one does see how it could create the perception of a bias against locals.

    The other thing that I find amusing is the fact Petersen likes to make those snarky comments about recruiting star rankings being garbage, yet at least 42 of his 56 early offers are guys that carry 4- or 5-star early rankings. And most of the remainder are high 3-stars.
    Pete is full of shit on recruiting rankings. He had to be at Boise state and when you form an attitude that hard and publicly mock the obvious truth, it's hard to turn that shit around even when it is clear that you are wrong. You won't have to crane your neck in our society to see examples of this everywhere.

    If every college coach could have their first choice there would only be like 100 players selected total.

    There's a difference between there being a strong correlation between rankings and performance and a PERFECT correlation and Pete is as guilty as anyone at trying to poison our society with the notion than a non-perfect correlation is basically the same thing as no correlation.
    The top 1% or so of players are so easy to identify even Eklund could do it. I do give Petersen some real credit for being able to identify and project long term potential a lot better than most coaches.

    But the narrative that recruiting rankings are meaningless is reflexive BS.

    There's definitely plenty of "noise" in the data and unseen variables but the correlation is there.

    Heh, this stuff is way more reliable than economic data I do work with and we make way more important decisions based on that.

    Recruiting rankings >>> The dismal science
    I'll take recruiting rankings over the official index of leading economic indicators all day, every day.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter