Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

I can’t wait until jake browning is done at UW.

2»

Comments

  • NeGgaPlEaSeNeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 5,729

    If Jake were 1/2 the Qb Smiff was ....

    Smiff was a GOOD college Qb; it stands to reason he'd be a great OC. I don't get it.

    Smith had ocho cinco and housh to throw to, which eclipses ross and dante last year.
    Don't forget steven Jackson
  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,279 Founders Club
    edited November 2017

    If Jake were 1/2 the Qb Smiff was ....

    Smiff was a GOOD college Qb; it stands to reason he'd be a great OC. I don't get it.

    Smith had ocho cinco and housh to throw to, which eclipses ross and dante last year.
    People forget that

    If Jake were 1/2 the Qb Smiff was ....

    Smiff was a GOOD college Qb; it stands to reason he'd be a great OC. I don't get it.

    Smith had ocho cinco and housh to throw to, which eclipses ross and dante last year.
    Don't forget steven Jackson
    People forget that too


    #ATBSJBS
  • Mosster47Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246

    He is the epitome of a game manager. He can win if everything around him is working, but if you have to rely on him to win a game, you're fucked. Unfortunately, our stupid fucking OC is convinced that Jake is the second coming of Joe Montana. In reality, he's the second coming of uncle Rico.

    Name me a Chris Petersen QB that doesn't fit this mold. It's sound football.

    Last night boiled down to you aren't that talented on offense, which you aren't. Coleman might get a cup of coffee in the league and Pettis will get a shot as a punt returner more than a WR. Everyone else is a college player. Good players, but talent matters. It's why you couldn't score on ASU. Their defense is talented to say the least.

    Secondly you have two stud D-tackles. Those guys are fucking good. Gaines gained a little too much weight and plays a little lazy compared to last year, but they are both guys that will earn NFL pensions. Stanford has one of the best S&C programs in America. When they put seven guys on the LOS minimum that's tough for two guys to make a difference.

    Stanford is 100% beatable if you have the right dudes, but most don't which is why they win so much. Wisconsin does the same thing every year.

    Coaching, at least schematically isn't why you lost last night.
  • NeGgaPlEaSeNeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 5,729
    Mosster47 said:

    He is the epitome of a game manager. He can win if everything around him is working, but if you have to rely on him to win a game, you're fucked. Unfortunately, our stupid fucking OC is convinced that Jake is the second coming of Joe Montana. In reality, he's the second coming of uncle Rico.

    Name me a Chris Petersen QB that doesn't fit this mold. It's sound football.

    Last night boiled down to you aren't that talented on offense, which you aren't. Coleman might get a cup of coffee in the league and Pettis will get a shot as a punt returner more than a WR. Everyone else is a college player. Good players, but talent matters. It's why you couldn't score on ASU. Their defense is talented to say the least.

    Secondly you have two stud D-tackles. Those guys are fucking good. Gaines gained a little too much weight and plays a little lazy compared to last year, but they are both guys that will earn NFL pensions. Stanford has one of the best S&C programs in America. When they put seven guys on the LOS minimum that's tough for two guys to make a difference.

    Stanford is 100% beatable if you have the right dudes, but most don't which is why they win so much. Wisconsin does the same thing every year.

    Coaching, at least schematically isn't why you lost last night.
    Get the fuck out of here. Any decent coach would have won that game
  • Mosster47Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246

    Mosster47 said:

    He is the epitome of a game manager. He can win if everything around him is working, but if you have to rely on him to win a game, you're fucked. Unfortunately, our stupid fucking OC is convinced that Jake is the second coming of Joe Montana. In reality, he's the second coming of uncle Rico.

    Name me a Chris Petersen QB that doesn't fit this mold. It's sound football.

    Last night boiled down to you aren't that talented on offense, which you aren't. Coleman might get a cup of coffee in the league and Pettis will get a shot as a punt returner more than a WR. Everyone else is a college player. Good players, but talent matters. It's why you couldn't score on ASU. Their defense is talented to say the least.

    Secondly you have two stud D-tackles. Those guys are fucking good. Gaines gained a little too much weight and plays a little lazy compared to last year, but they are both guys that will earn NFL pensions. Stanford has one of the best S&C programs in America. When they put seven guys on the LOS minimum that's tough for two guys to make a difference.

    Stanford is 100% beatable if you have the right dudes, but most don't which is why they win so much. Wisconsin does the same thing every year.

    Coaching, at least schematically isn't why you lost last night.
    Get the fuck out of here. Any decent coach would have won that game
    You have like the winningest active coach and the same staff that got you to the Bama scrimmage last year. They didn't forget how to coach.
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 43,541 Standard Supporter
    image

    You plan to enroll at the University of Washington in early January for winter quarter, and have to work ahead to make sure you complete your classes at Coeur d’Alene High, where the semester ends the third week of January. How tough was the decision to leave high school early?

    “A difficult one. Obviously it’s not easy to say goodbye to the second half of your senior year. But I figured if I’m going to play college football, I’m going to do it right

    Bye, Jake.
  • PassionPassion Member Posts: 4,622
    BallzDeep said:

    We're almost three full seasons into Browning's career and he has won zero competitive games against quality opponents. ZERO. Every time the game is competitive in the second half he shits himself. He hasn't even gotten an impressive win just by pure luck.

    His Freshman season they were the epitome of average. Blew out every shit team and got beat by every competitive team. His Sophomore season he shit himself against Bama, Colorado (bailed out by running game and defense), USC, Utah (bailed out by Pettis), and Arizona (bailed out by Coleman). This season the only two competitive games so far against respectable teams he shits himself both times and they lose.

    The most impressive second half performance of his career in competitive game came this season against Rutgers with the help of Gaskin who made a couple of phenomenal catches. What do you do with a QB who can't perform in the second half and win you a game when the other team isn't utter garbage?

    Yes. Anyone with half a brain has known this for over a year. He cannot perform against a quality defense/opponent: he can blow out bad teams but completely falls apart against good ones.
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,520 Founders Club
    Mosster47 said:

    He is the epitome of a game manager. He can win if everything around him is working, but if you have to rely on him to win a game, you're fucked. Unfortunately, our stupid fucking OC is convinced that Jake is the second coming of Joe Montana. In reality, he's the second coming of uncle Rico.

    Name me a Chris Petersen QB that doesn't fit this mold. It's sound football.

    Last night boiled down to you aren't that talented on offense, which you aren't. Coleman might get a cup of coffee in the league and Pettis will get a shot as a punt returner more than a WR. Everyone else is a college player. Good players, but talent matters. It's why you couldn't score on ASU. Their defense is talented to say the least.

    Secondly you have two stud D-tackles. Those guys are fucking good. Gaines gained a little too much weight and plays a little lazy compared to last year, but they are both guys that will earn NFL pensions. Stanford has one of the best S&C programs in America. When they put seven guys on the LOS minimum that's tough for two guys to make a difference.

    Stanford is 100% beatable if you have the right dudes, but most don't which is why they win so much. Wisconsin does the same thing every year.

    Coaching, at least schematically isn't why you lost last night.
    The "high level coach in a football state" is defending the coaches. Shocker.

    We basically contained Love most of the game, and their skill guys and QB aren't anything special. Costello was missing plenty of throws in the first half. Coaching definitely matters. Everyone knew what Shaw's strategy was and it's his strategy 99% of the time - shorten the game and grind it out. We couldn't stop it and couldn't adjust. The second half was abysmal.
Sign In or Register to comment.