I'll chip in for your ticket. Anyone else willing to help Hondo?
So how many have democracy killed? By the way we're a democratic republic. Doesn't look like you know that.
No we aren't a democratic republic. We are a representative democracy. (Technically a constitutional federal representative democracy). But still in the family of democracy. Dumbass.
And the US has killed several hundred thousand people in the middle East alone.
I'll chip in for your ticket. Anyone else willing to help Hondo?
So how many have democracy killed? By the way we're a democratic republic. Doesn't look like you know that.
No we aren't a democratic republic. We are a representative democracy. (Technically a constitutional federal representative democracy). But still in the family of democracy. Dumbass.
And the US has killed several hundred thousand people in the middle East alone.
I'll chip in for your ticket. Anyone else willing to help Hondo?
So how many have democracy killed? By the way we're a democratic republic. Doesn't look like you know that.
No we aren't a democratic republic. We are a representative democracy. (Technically a constitutional federal representative democracy). But still in the family of democracy. Dumbass.
And the US has killed several hundred thousand people in the middle East alone.
I'll chip in for your ticket. Anyone else willing to help Hondo?
So how many have democracy killed? By the way we're a democratic republic. Doesn't look like you know that.
No we aren't a democratic republic. We are a representative democracy. (Technically a constitutional federal representative democracy). But still in the family of democracy. Dumbass.
And the US has killed several hundred thousand people in the middle East alone.
I'll chip in for your ticket. Anyone else willing to help Hondo?
So how many have democracy killed? By the way we're a democratic republic. Doesn't look like you know that.
No we aren't a democratic republic. We are a representative democracy. (Technically a constitutional federal representative democracy). But still in the family of democracy. Dumbass.
And the US has killed several hundred thousand people in the middle East alone.
Communists are inside our government, some openly. Some claim to be socialists. Same thing same dead people. Then there are the "progressives" who are nothing but the same in sheep's clothing.. The democratic party and our educational systems are the last real bastions of communism. It's ridiculous. Where's McCarthy?
Working awesome in Portugal:
Since 2015, Portugal has had a minority Socialist government, backed by the Communists and Left Bloc in parliament, which has overseen a robust economic expansion, helped by investment and tourism.
This year the country is set to record its highest growth in at least ten years, helped by foreign investment and exports.
See The Peoples Republic of China. There's far more to it than the economics. Think, don't just parrot.
I'll chip in for your ticket. Anyone else willing to help Hondo?
Still not in the last 20 years. In other words. Democracy has killed more people in the last 20 years than any other form of government. According to your idiotic methodology.
I'll chip in for your ticket. Anyone else willing to help Hondo?
Still not in the last 20 years. In other words. Democracy has killed more people in the last 20 years than any other form of government. According to your idiotic methodology.
The governing center-right coalition won the most seats in the October 2015 parliamentary elections but lost its majority. Shortly thereafter, Socialist former Lisbon Mayor António Costa joined leftist parties in the parliament to topple the government. In November 2015, Costa was appointed prime minister. The anti-austerity government has slowed economic reforms, causing friction with the European Union and International Monetary Fund. Adherence to strict budgetary discipline had allowed Portugal to move beyond the worst of its economic crisis, but growth has slowed, and Portugal failed to meet the EU-mandated deficit reduction target. Unemployment is high, especially among younger Portuguese, many of whom have moved abroad for work.
>>> Yeah, I bet every US kid strives to fall to the economic and lifestyle of Portugese puppets
The governing center-right coalition won the most seats in the October 2015 parliamentary elections but lost its majority. Shortly thereafter, Socialist former Lisbon Mayor António Costa joined leftist parties in the parliament to topple the government. In November 2015, Costa was appointed prime minister. The anti-austerity government has slowed economic reforms, causing friction with the European Union and International Monetary Fund. Adherence to strict budgetary discipline had allowed Portugal to move beyond the worst of its economic crisis, but growth has slowed, and Portugal failed to meet the EU-mandated deficit reduction target. Unemployment is high, especially among younger Portuguese, many of whom have moved abroad for work.
>>> Yeah, I bet every US kid strives to fall to the economic and lifestyle of Portugese puppets
2) Mandate all households to obtain adequate insurance. Many states now require passengers in automobiles to wear seatbelts for their own protection. Many others require anybody driving a car to have li a bility insurance. But neither the federal government nor any state requires all households to protect themselves from the potentially catastrophic costs of a serious accident or illness. Under the Heritage plan, there would be such a requirement. This man d ate is based on two important principles. First, that health care protection is a responsibility of individuals, not businesses. Thus to the extent that anybody should be required to provide coverage to a family, the household mandate assumes that it is t h e family that carries the first responsibility. Second, it assumes that there is an implicit contract between households and society, based on the notion that health insurance is not like other forms of insurance protection. If a young man wrecks his Pors c he and has not had the foresight to obtain insurance, we may commiserate but society feels no obligation to repair his car. But health care is different. If a man is struck down by a heart attack in the street, Americans will care for him whether or not h e has insurance. If we find that he has spent his money on other things rather than insurance, we may be angry but we will not deny him services - even if that means more prudent citizens end up paying the tab. A mandate on individuals recognizes this impl i cit contract.
The governing center-right coalition won the most seats in the October 2015 parliamentary elections but lost its majority. Shortly thereafter, Socialist former Lisbon Mayor António Costa joined leftist parties in the parliament to topple the government. In November 2015, Costa was appointed prime minister. The anti-austerity government has slowed economic reforms, causing friction with the European Union and International Monetary Fund. Adherence to strict budgetary discipline had allowed Portugal to move beyond the worst of its economic crisis, but growth has slowed, and Portugal failed to meet the EU-mandated deficit reduction target. Unemployment is high, especially among younger Portuguese, many of whom have moved abroad for work.
>>> Yeah, I bet every US kid strives to fall to the economic and lifestyle of Portugese puppets
2) Mandate all households to obtain adequate insurance. Many states now require passengers in automobiles to wear seatbelts for their own protection. Many others require anybody driving a car to have li a bility insurance. But neither the federal government nor any state requires all households to protect themselves from the potentially catastrophic costs of a serious accident or illness. Under the Heritage plan, there would be such a requirement. This man d ate is based on two important principles. First, that health care protection is a responsibility of individuals, not businesses. Thus to the extent that anybody should be required to provide coverage to a family, the household mandate assumes that it is t h e family that carries the first responsibility. Second, it assumes that there is an implicit contract between households and society, based on the notion that health insurance is not like other forms of insurance protection. If a young man wrecks his Pors c he and has not had the foresight to obtain insurance, we may commiserate but society feels no obligation to repair his car. But health care is different. If a man is struck down by a heart attack in the street, Americans will care for him whether or not h e has insurance. If we find that he has spent his money on other things rather than insurance, we may be angry but we will not deny him services - even if that means more prudent citizens end up paying the tab. A mandate on individuals recognizes this impl i cit contract.
You were attempting to mis-use a highly credible source. I wanted to see how you were trying to lie/manipulate Heritage to further your Communist agenda.
Comments
Very authoritative.
And the US has killed several hundred thousand people in the middle East alone.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Iraq_War
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilian_casualties_in_the_war_in_Afghanistan_(2001–present)
Stalin starved 8 million just in the Ukraine. Mao something like 40 million on the great leap forward. You failed 3rd grade 14 times right?
There's far more to it than the economics.
Think, don't just parrot.
You're still here.
schtickdick.>>> Yeah, I bet every US kid strives to fall to the economic and lifestyle of Portugese puppets
http://www.heritage.org/index/country/portugal
2) Mandate all households to obtain adequate insurance. Many states now require passengers in automobiles to wear seatbelts for their own protection. Many others require anybody driving a car to have li a bility insurance. But neither the federal government nor any state requires all households to protect themselves from the potentially catastrophic costs of a serious accident or illness. Under the Heritage plan, there would be such a requirement. This man d ate is based on two important principles. First, that health care protection is a responsibility of individuals, not businesses. Thus to the extent that anybody should be required to provide coverage to a family, the household mandate assumes that it is t h e family that carries the first responsibility. Second, it assumes that there is an implicit contract between households and society, based on the notion that health insurance is not like other forms of insurance protection. If a young man wrecks his Pors c he and has not had the foresight to obtain insurance, we may commiserate but society feels no obligation to repair his car. But health care is different. If a man is struck down by a heart attack in the street, Americans will care for him whether or not h e has insurance. If we find that he has spent his money on other things rather than insurance, we may be angry but we will not deny him services - even if that means more prudent citizens end up paying the tab. A mandate on individuals recognizes this impl i cit contract.
I laffed
Would that mean that they were for Obamacare before they were against it?
And that's your contribution?
I didn't even need to read the article.