Willie Taggart
Comments
-
Hi @SwayeSwaye said:
I keep getting alerts and am too stoopid to figure out how to turn them off.WilburHooksHands said:
I don't know watching Mosster quook and a few kill yourselfs every couple posts is underrated.Swaye said:I hate this thread so much.
-
Willie Taggart.
Willie Faggart.
Willie Fucking Faggart.
Willie Fucking Fags.
AIDS.
-
So you are saying you think unfavorably of Taggart?PineapplePirate said:Willie Taggart.
Willie Faggart.
Willie Fucking Faggart.
Willie Fucking Fags.
AIDS. -
When do we get to start calling Peterson “7”PineapplePirate said:Willie Taggart.
Willie Faggart.
Willie Fucking Faggart.
Willie Fucking Fags.
AIDS.
Just kidding. I like to joke with you guys. Last night was just a hiccup in your march to an injury free, undefeated rest of the season.
I don’t care what anyone says, that was a GOOD ASU defense. -
You might be the best troll the Duck fan base has ever produced.MikeSeaver said:
When do we get to start calling Peterson “7”PineapplePirate said:Willie Taggart.
Willie Faggart.
Willie Fucking Faggart.
Willie Fucking Fags.
AIDS.
Just kidding. I like to joke with you guys. Last night was just a hiccup in your march to an injury free, undefeated rest of the season.
I don’t care what anyone says, that was a GOOD ASU defense. -
I'm still LIPO with Taggart. I know Sark defenders talked about how TY left the cupboards bare, but seriously, Slingblade left Taggart with a 5th string running back and a reserve wide receiver/safety as backup quarterbacks. That still doesn't excuse the 49 point drubbing the defense took. I will say though, Slingblage gave up 52 last year at home to Stanford, and he had an offense with a pulse.
I still think this is a 7 win team. Which is what most reasonable quooks expected. Peterson lost a few times in his first couple years at UW as well, but I'll add that he never got blasted 49-7, but I'll also add that I don't think Taggart is on the same level as Peterson either.
In the end, LIPO. As log as they continue to improve year over year, I'm good with Taggart. Even with the issues the last couple games, I still see a better overall unit than I did at any time last year under Helfrich. -
Helfrich butt-blasted Peterman to the tune of 45-20, butt whose countinbg?greenblood said:I'm still LIPO with Taggart. I know Sark defenders talked about how TY left the cupboards bare, but seriously, Slingblade left Taggart with a 5th string running back and a reserve wide receiver/safety as backup quarterbacks. That still doesn't excuse the 49 point drubbing the defense took. I will say though, Slingblage gave up 52 last year at home to Stanford, and he had an offense with a pulse.
I still think this is a 7 win team. Which is what most reasonable quooks expected. Peterson lost a few times in his first couple years at UW as well, but I'll add that he never got blasted 49-7, but I'll also add that I don't think Taggart is on the same level as Peterson either.
In the end, LIPO. As log as they continue to improve year over year, I'm good with Taggart. Even with the issues the last couple games, I still see a better overall unit than I did at any time last year under Helfrich.
I agree though - LIFPO still.
-
Mariota butt-blasted Peterman 45-20 not Helfrich. That game was also much more competitive than 70-21AZDuck said:
Helfrich butt-blasted Peterman to the tune of 45-20, butt whose countinbg?greenblood said:I'm still LIPO with Taggart. I know Sark defenders talked about how TY left the cupboards bare, but seriously, Slingblade left Taggart with a 5th string running back and a reserve wide receiver/safety as backup quarterbacks. That still doesn't excuse the 49 point drubbing the defense took. I will say though, Slingblage gave up 52 last year at home to Stanford, and he had an offense with a pulse.
I still think this is a 7 win team. Which is what most reasonable quooks expected. Peterson lost a few times in his first couple years at UW as well, but I'll add that he never got blasted 49-7, but I'll also add that I don't think Taggart is on the same level as Peterson either.
In the end, LIPO. As log as they continue to improve year over year, I'm good with Taggart. Even with the issues the last couple games, I still see a better overall unit than I did at any time last year under Helfrich.
I agree though - LIFPO still. -
yeah, but it's more fun with Helfirchgreenblood said:
Mariota butt-blasted Peterman 45-20 not Helfrich. That game was also much more competitive than 70-21AZDuck said:
Helfrich butt-blasted Peterman to the tune of 45-20, butt whose countinbg?greenblood said:I'm still LIPO with Taggart. I know Sark defenders talked about how TY left the cupboards bare, but seriously, Slingblade left Taggart with a 5th string running back and a reserve wide receiver/safety as backup quarterbacks. That still doesn't excuse the 49 point drubbing the defense took. I will say though, Slingblage gave up 52 last year at home to Stanford, and he had an offense with a pulse.
I still think this is a 7 win team. Which is what most reasonable quooks expected. Peterson lost a few times in his first couple years at UW as well, but I'll add that he never got blasted 49-7, but I'll also add that I don't think Taggart is on the same level as Peterson either.
In the end, LIPO. As log as they continue to improve year over year, I'm good with Taggart. Even with the issues the last couple games, I still see a better overall unit than I did at any time last year under Helfrich.
I agree though - LIFPO still. -
Can't argue with thatAZDuck said:
yeah, but it's more fun with Helfirchgreenblood said:
Mariota butt-blasted Peterman 45-20 not Helfrich. That game was also much more competitive than 70-21AZDuck said:
Helfrich butt-blasted Peterman to the tune of 45-20, butt whose countinbg?greenblood said:I'm still LIPO with Taggart. I know Sark defenders talked about how TY left the cupboards bare, but seriously, Slingblade left Taggart with a 5th string running back and a reserve wide receiver/safety as backup quarterbacks. That still doesn't excuse the 49 point drubbing the defense took. I will say though, Slingblage gave up 52 last year at home to Stanford, and he had an offense with a pulse.
I still think this is a 7 win team. Which is what most reasonable quooks expected. Peterson lost a few times in his first couple years at UW as well, but I'll add that he never got blasted 49-7, but I'll also add that I don't think Taggart is on the same level as Peterson either.
In the end, LIPO. As log as they continue to improve year over year, I'm good with Taggart. Even with the issues the last couple games, I still see a better overall unit than I did at any time last year under Helfrich.
I agree though - LIFPO still.
