This is why my default setting on guns is: people who want to keep things more or less as they are need to show me how to make gun ownership safe by developed-world standards.
Paws, I'm curious why you are linking a liberal website. That being said, this chart is telling. I'm curious if anyone knows when the Brady bill was signed and then lapsed correlated with this chart.
If you are going to site Australia's gun suicide rate dropping as a leading example of why you should limit guns shouldn't you do a bit more background research on that (i.e. is it really changing anything)?
Chart #5 is telling. Look how low NJ and IL are relatively speaking and that's with places like Chicago and Newark included. And the all white people states like MT and WY are leading the pack.
If you are going to site Australia's gun suicide rate dropping as a leading example of why you should limit guns shouldn't you do a bit more background research on that (i.e. is it really changing anything)?
'85 - '93 spike in violence, mass shootings, L.A. gangsters shooting uzis at each other, playground shootings, etc. Led to crime bills, assault weapons ban, and passage of Brady Bill.
Progressives conveniently ignore the spike in violence from the drug trafficking gang wars of the late 80's and early 90's when they decry Mass Incarceration and instead blame it solely upon unfair & discriminatory sentencing laws.
Sorry folks, but you can't ignore the facts when making your arguments.
1) Infographics are overrated 2) See above (oh they used an icon of a gun...cute! Can't wait to Pinterest it!) 3) Most map charts just become population charts 4) Calendars should always feature bikini girls 5) Too busy 6) Too small 7) Not enough contrast to make an impact. Every state is colored, so you can't easily identify the focal point(s) 8) Grid lines too dotted 9) Line charts don't need data markers 10) Needs more contrast between colors 11) Pie charts are for pedophiles, although kudos for limiting to two slices per pie 12) Visually not bad. Incomplete story as it's lacking the suicide rate for self-immolation over the same years. 13) Another population chart ... worthless 14) Not terrible. Uses a lot of ink to say almost nothing, though. 15) Here, the data labels don't add insight and make an already busy chart busier. Showing % on Y-axis would be a better choice 16) Hard to follow 17) Pretty good, except the "R-D diff" column on the right is unnecessary and distracting
If you are going to site Australia's gun suicide rate dropping as a leading example of why you should limit guns shouldn't you do a bit more background research on that (i.e. is it really changing anything)?
If you are going to site Australia's gun suicide rate dropping as a leading example of why you should limit guns shouldn't you do a bit more background research on that (i.e. is it really changing anything)?
If you are going to site Australia's gun suicide rate dropping as a leading example of why you should limit guns shouldn't you do a bit more background research on that (i.e. is it really changing anything)?
If you are going to site Australia's gun suicide rate dropping as a leading example of why you should limit guns shouldn't you do a bit more background research on that (i.e. is it really changing anything)?
This is why my default setting on guns is: people who want to keep things more or less as they are need to show me how to make gun ownership safe by developed-world standards.
Alternatively - treat guns like cars.
Switzerland does very nicely but I'm not sure how since most adults have an actual assault weapon and ammunition at home.
This article is total bullshit. Just look where most homicides occur and it'll be democrat controlled and have very strict gun laws. Try the book More Guns Less Crime. By this guy:
This is why my default setting on guns is: people who want to keep things more or less as they are need to show me how to make gun ownership safe by developed-world standards.
Alternatively - treat guns like cars.
Switzerland does very nicely but I'm not sure how since most adults have an actual assault weapon and ammunition at home. This article is total bullshit. Just look where most homicides occur and it'll be democrat controlled and have very strict gun laws. Try the book More Guns Less Crime. By this guy:
This is why my default setting on guns is: people who want to keep things more or less as they are need to show me how to make gun ownership safe by developed-world standards.
Alternatively - treat guns like cars.
Switzerland does very nicely but I'm not sure how since most adults have an actual assault weapon and ammunition at home.
This article is total bullshit. Just look where most homicides occur and it'll be democrat controlled and have very strict gun laws. Try the book More Guns Less Crime. By this guy:
If you are going to site Australia's gun suicide rate dropping as a leading example of why you should limit guns shouldn't you do a bit more background research on that (i.e. is it really changing anything)?
If you are going to site Australia's gun suicide rate dropping as a leading example of why you should limit guns shouldn't you do a bit more background research on that (i.e. is it really changing anything)?
Your @TheChart is hard as fuck to read, but it looks like Australia's death rate by suicide is as low as it's been since the early 1950's.
Two morons that can't read.
From the link... In 2015, 3,027 people ended their own lives in Australia. That's 12.6 people in every 100,000.
Which puts it above the average of where its been for the last almost 100 years. So if you are "bright" enough to write an article that says getting rid of guns will save people from committing suicide and use Australia as the example, shouldn't you at least go spend 30 seconds Googling the actual Australia data to see if it helped before you claim this wonderful benefit?
Like I said, the Vox folks are not the sharpest tools in the shed.
And if you are "bright" enough to reply to a simple post pointing out this stupidity without reading/understanding a simple link and plot...well...that is how we coin terms like HondoFS...but in your defense at least you weren't alone?
This is why my default setting on guns is: people who want to keep things more or less as they are need to show me how to make gun ownership safe by developed-world standards.
Alternatively - treat guns like cars.
Switzerland does very nicely but I'm not sure how since most adults have an actual assault weapon and ammunition at home.
This article is total bullshit. Just look where most homicides occur and it'll be democrat controlled and have very strict gun laws. Try the book More Guns Less Crime. By this guy:
Linky no worky. I even run into Swiss citizens at rifle ranges here in the states because even if they are out of country they turn in there qualification targets. The don't have their Stg57's or SG550'something. They were shooting K31's because they can't have the others here. They buy ammunition at cost from the government and that most towns have shooting ranges. I guess they were all crazy liars.
Comments
This is why my default setting on guns is: people who want to keep things more or less as they are need to show me how to make gun ownership safe by developed-world standards.
Alternatively - treat guns like cars.
If you are going to site Australia's gun suicide rate dropping as a leading example of why you should limit guns shouldn't you do a bit more background research on that (i.e. is it really changing anything)?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com.au/2016/09/27/australias-suicide-crisis-has-peaked-to-a-terrifying-new-height_a_21480647/
Don't change for me.
Progressives conveniently ignore the spike in violence from the drug trafficking gang wars of the late 80's and early 90's when they decry Mass Incarceration and instead blame it solely upon unfair & discriminatory sentencing laws.
Sorry folks, but you can't ignore the facts when making your arguments.
1) Infographics are overrated
2) See above (oh they used an icon of a gun...cute! Can't wait to Pinterest it!)
3) Most map charts just become population charts
4) Calendars should always feature bikini girls
5) Too busy
6) Too small
7) Not enough contrast to make an impact. Every state is colored, so you can't easily identify the focal point(s)
8) Grid lines too dotted
9) Line charts don't need data markers
10) Needs more contrast between colors
11) Pie charts are for pedophiles, although kudos for limiting to two slices per pie
12) Visually not bad. Incomplete story as it's lacking the suicide rate for self-immolation over the same years.
13) Another population chart ... worthless
14) Not terrible. Uses a lot of ink to say almost nothing, though.
15) Here, the data labels don't add insight and make an already busy chart busier. Showing % on Y-axis would be a better choice
16) Hard to follow
17) Pretty good, except the "R-D diff" column on the right is unnecessary and distracting
This article is total bullshit. Just look where most homicides occur and it'll be democrat controlled and have very strict gun laws. Try the book More Guns Less Crime. By this guy:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Kleck
526 murder victims in Chicago alone so far this year. Hondo's silence is the normal response from the far left.
Look at all these liberal states!!
Not the case
From the link...
In 2015, 3,027 people ended their own lives in Australia. That's 12.6 people in every 100,000.
Which puts it above the average of where its been for the last almost 100 years. So if you are "bright" enough to write an article that says getting rid of guns will save people from committing suicide and use Australia as the example, shouldn't you at least go spend 30 seconds Googling the actual Australia data to see if it helped before you claim this wonderful benefit?
Like I said, the Vox folks are not the sharpest tools in the shed.
And if you are "bright" enough to reply to a simple post pointing out this stupidity without reading/understanding a simple link and plot...well...that is how we coin terms like HondoFS...but in your defense at least you weren't alone?