I'm watching our boy DeRuyter blow it. They were just up 14 like 5 minutes ago.
The think I think is weird with this board is the idea that good coaches are perfect. It turns out there hasn't been a lot of coaches that go 12-0 every year and win 100 consecutive natties (I like to call them that).
It actually considerably weakens the HHB argument to say that coaches suck when they lose. That's a standard no one can meet...
Sark isn't mediocre because he loses games... he's mediocre because he loses a LOT of games. Losing 1-2 games a year is a stellar record... losing 6 a year is mediocre.
I'm watching our boy DeRuyter blow it. They were just up 14 like 5 minutes ago.
The think I think is weird with this board is the idea that good coaches are perfect. It turns out there hasn't been a lot of coaches that go 12-0 every year and win 100 consecutive natties (I like to call them that).
It actually considerably weakens the HHB argument to say that coaches suck when they lose. That's a standard no one can meet...
Sark isn't mediocre because he loses games... he's mediocre because he loses a LOT of games. Losing 1-2 games a year is a stellar record... losing 6 a year is mediocre.
It's not us it's the idiot Doogs. Mora loses a couple of games then Doogs write him off and they'll do the same with DeRuyter. Nevermind Sark is allowed to lose 6+ games every year.
Comments
It actually considerably weakens the HHB argument to say that coaches suck when they lose. That's a standard no one can meet...
Sark isn't mediocre because he loses games... he's mediocre because he loses a LOT of games. Losing 1-2 games a year is a stellar record... losing 6 a year is mediocre.
Too soon.