Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Washington Post rips the antifa idiots
Comments
-
I'm hearing Bezos is an Antifa sympathizer.
-
Yes, now that the ANTIFA/Dem connection is firmly established, suddenly, some Dems are having second thoughts.
El-oh-el
https://www.mediaite.com/columnists/why-wont-media-demand-dems-condemn-antifa/
http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2017/04/21/berkeley-mayor-is-member-of-antifa-facebook-group-that-organized-riots/ Plus https://pjmedia.com/trending/2017/08/29/berkeley-mayor-wants-antifa-classified-gang-assaulting-trump-supporters/ -
I just think most of these Antifa faggots are upset at the recent League of Legends patch and need to let out some agression.
-
Excellent piece Boobs from a quality, reputable, news source.
-
I don't know what's more pathetic, Boobs turning in his black scarf or he actually paying to be a WaPost subscriber.YellowSnow said:Excellent piece Boobs from a quality, reputable, news source.
-
I'm giving Boobs props for linking a good piece from a reputable, albeit center-left newspaper. They have good reporters and the op-ed page has a wide array of view points. This chart is pretty accurate in my view.salemcoog said:
I don't know what's more pathetic, Boobs turning in his black scarf or he actually paying to be a WaPost subscriber.YellowSnow said:Excellent piece Boobs from a quality, reputable, news source.
-
Truth is truth why so much concern who gets credit?
-
The problem with the democrats are the democrat mayors and councils telling the police to stand down. They are purposely inciting the violence Antifa brings. I wonder where the marching orders are coming from since Soros and company run Antifa (BLM too) and the democratic party.
-
The guardian is shit.
-
That chart isn't fit to line my grammas catbox.YellowSnow said:
I'm giving Boobs props for linking a good piece from a reputable, albeit center-left newspaper. They have good reporters and the op-ed page has a wide array of view points. This chart is pretty accurate in my view.salemcoog said:
I don't know what's more pathetic, Boobs turning in his black scarf or he actually paying to be a WaPost subscriber.YellowSnow said:Excellent piece Boobs from a quality, reputable, news source.
-
I take it you weren't happy with the placement of the Tin Foil Hat Times?salemcoog said:
That chart isn't fit to line my grammas catbox.YellowSnow said:
I'm giving Boobs props for linking a good piece from a reputable, albeit center-left newspaper. They have good reporters and the op-ed page has a wide array of view points. This chart is pretty accurate in my view.salemcoog said:
I don't know what's more pathetic, Boobs turning in his black scarf or he actually paying to be a WaPost subscriber.YellowSnow said:Excellent piece Boobs from a quality, reputable, news source.
-
salemcoog said:
I don't know what's more pathetic, Boobs turning in his black scarf or he actually paying to be a WaPost subscriber.YellowSnow said:Excellent piece Boobs from a quality, reputable, news source.
-
Mainstream news is hard left. No gray area whatsoever. HTH.YellowSnow said:
I'm giving Boobs props for linking a good piece from a reputable, albeit center-left newspaper. They have good reporters and the op-ed page has a wide array of view points. This chart is pretty accurate in my view.salemcoog said:
I don't know what's more pathetic, Boobs turning in his black scarf or he actually paying to be a WaPost subscriber.YellowSnow said:Excellent piece Boobs from a quality, reputable, news source.
-
Bull shit. It's center-left for NYT, WP, etc. WSJ, Economist, are center-right. There's a pretty god damned big difference between center-left and hard left. A new outlet can be left or right leaning and still be a reputable source of news. HTH.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Mainstream news is hard left. No gray area whatsoever. HTH.YellowSnow said:
I'm giving Boobs props for linking a good piece from a reputable, albeit center-left newspaper. They have good reporters and the op-ed page has a wide array of view points. This chart is pretty accurate in my view.salemcoog said:
I don't know what's more pathetic, Boobs turning in his black scarf or he actually paying to be a WaPost subscriber.YellowSnow said:Excellent piece Boobs from a quality, reputable, news source.
-
NYT and WP are nothing more than worthless hard left propaganda machines, like CNN and MSNBC. Nothing but one sided trash. Show me one positive article they have ever published about Trump.YellowSnow said:
Bull shit. It's center-left for NYT, WP, etc. WSJ, Economist, are center-right. There's a pretty god damned big difference between center-left and hard left. A new outlet can be left or right leaning and still be a reputable source of news. HTH.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Mainstream news is hard left. No gray area whatsoever. HTH.YellowSnow said:
I'm giving Boobs props for linking a good piece from a reputable, albeit center-left newspaper. They have good reporters and the op-ed page has a wide array of view points. This chart is pretty accurate in my view.salemcoog said:
I don't know what's more pathetic, Boobs turning in his black scarf or he actually paying to be a WaPost subscriber.YellowSnow said:Excellent piece Boobs from a quality, reputable, news source.
-
@TheChart was clearly created by someone from the second-to-left column.YellowSnow said:
I'm giving Boobs props for linking a good piece from a reputable, albeit center-left newspaper. They have good reporters and the op-ed page has a wide array of view points. This chart is pretty accurate in my view.salemcoog said:
I don't know what's more pathetic, Boobs turning in his black scarf or he actually paying to be a WaPost subscriber.YellowSnow said:Excellent piece Boobs from a quality, reputable, news source.
-
They are in good company with conservative/right leaning papers like the San Diego Union Tribune, Arizona Republic, Dallas Morning News, etc. all of which had never endorsed a Democrat for President in the past 100 years until 2016.oregonblitzkrieg said:
NYT and WP are nothing more than worthless hard left propaganda machines, like CNN and MSNBC. Nothing but one sided trash. Show me one positive article they have ever published about Trump.YellowSnow said:
Bull shit. It's center-left for NYT, WP, etc. WSJ, Economist, are center-right. There's a pretty god damned big difference between center-left and hard left. A new outlet can be left or right leaning and still be a reputable source of news. HTH.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Mainstream news is hard left. No gray area whatsoever. HTH.YellowSnow said:
I'm giving Boobs props for linking a good piece from a reputable, albeit center-left newspaper. They have good reporters and the op-ed page has a wide array of view points. This chart is pretty accurate in my view.salemcoog said:
I don't know what's more pathetic, Boobs turning in his black scarf or he actually paying to be a WaPost subscriber.YellowSnow said:Excellent piece Boobs from a quality, reputable, news source.
-
No more the NYT, WaPo and the real whoppers, NPR and CNN being non partisan make it a wasteland for fancy feast.YellowSnow said:
I take it you weren't happy with the placement of the Tin Foil Hat Times?salemcoog said:
That chart isn't fit to line my grammas catbox.YellowSnow said:
I'm giving Boobs props for linking a good piece from a reputable, albeit center-left newspaper. They have good reporters and the op-ed page has a wide array of view points. This chart is pretty accurate in my view.salemcoog said:
I don't know what's more pathetic, Boobs turning in his black scarf or he actually paying to be a WaPost subscriber.YellowSnow said:Excellent piece Boobs from a quality, reputable, news source.
-
In other words, Soros or Bezos purchased those papers between 2012 and 2016. Or did the Clintons bribe them with the bribes they took from Saudi Arabia, Oman and other islamofuck countries known for their strong stance on women's rights, gay rights and freedom of speech.YellowSnow said:
They are in good company with conservative/right leaning papers like the San Diego Union Tribune, Arizona Republic, Dallas Morning News, etc. all of which had never endorsed a Democrat for President in the past 100 years until 2016.oregonblitzkrieg said:
NYT and WP are nothing more than worthless hard left propaganda machines, like CNN and MSNBC. Nothing but one sided trash. Show me one positive article they have ever published about Trump.YellowSnow said:
Bull shit. It's center-left for NYT, WP, etc. WSJ, Economist, are center-right. There's a pretty god damned big difference between center-left and hard left. A new outlet can be left or right leaning and still be a reputable source of news. HTH.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Mainstream news is hard left. No gray area whatsoever. HTH.YellowSnow said:
I'm giving Boobs props for linking a good piece from a reputable, albeit center-left newspaper. They have good reporters and the op-ed page has a wide array of view points. This chart is pretty accurate in my view.salemcoog said:
I don't know what's more pathetic, Boobs turning in his black scarf or he actually paying to be a WaPost subscriber.YellowSnow said:Excellent piece Boobs from a quality, reputable, news source.
-
YellowSnow said:
I'm giving Boobs props for linking a good piece from a reputable, albeit center-left newspaper. They have good reporters and the op-ed page has a wide array of view points. This chart is pretty accurate in my view.salemcoog said:
I don't know what's more pathetic, Boobs turning in his black scarf or he actually paying to be a WaPost subscriber.YellowSnow said:Excellent piece Boobs from a quality, reputable, news source.
-
Show me where Fox news said anything positive on Obama.oregonblitzkrieg said:
NYT and WP are nothing more than worthless hard left propaganda machines, like CNN and MSNBC. Nothing but one sided trash. Show me one positive article they have ever published about Trump.YellowSnow said:
Bull shit. It's center-left for NYT, WP, etc. WSJ, Economist, are center-right. There's a pretty god damned big difference between center-left and hard left. A new outlet can be left or right leaning and still be a reputable source of news. HTH.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Mainstream news is hard left. No gray area whatsoever. HTH.YellowSnow said:
I'm giving Boobs props for linking a good piece from a reputable, albeit center-left newspaper. They have good reporters and the op-ed page has a wide array of view points. This chart is pretty accurate in my view.salemcoog said:
I don't know what's more pathetic, Boobs turning in his black scarf or he actually paying to be a WaPost subscriber.YellowSnow said:Excellent piece Boobs from a quality, reputable, news source.
-
Moot point, right leaning news organizations are the minority. Mainstream media is controlled by left wing.2001400ex said:
Show me where Fox news said anything positive on Obama.oregonblitzkrieg said:
NYT and WP are nothing more than worthless hard left propaganda machines, like CNN and MSNBC. Nothing but one sided trash. Show me one positive article they have ever published about Trump.YellowSnow said:
Bull shit. It's center-left for NYT, WP, etc. WSJ, Economist, are center-right. There's a pretty god damned big difference between center-left and hard left. A new outlet can be left or right leaning and still be a reputable source of news. HTH.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Mainstream news is hard left. No gray area whatsoever. HTH.YellowSnow said:
I'm giving Boobs props for linking a good piece from a reputable, albeit center-left newspaper. They have good reporters and the op-ed page has a wide array of view points. This chart is pretty accurate in my view.salemcoog said:
I don't know what's more pathetic, Boobs turning in his black scarf or he actually paying to be a WaPost subscriber.YellowSnow said:Excellent piece Boobs from a quality, reputable, news source.
-
*gurgle*Southerndawg said:YellowSnow said:
I'm giving Boobs props for linking a good piece from a reputable, albeit center-left newspaper. They have good reporters and the op-ed page has a wide array of view points. This chart is pretty accurate in my view.salemcoog said:
I don't know what's more pathetic, Boobs turning in his black scarf or he actually paying to be a WaPost subscriber.YellowSnow said:Excellent piece Boobs from a quality, reputable, news source.
-
Racist as fuckCirrhosisDawg said:
*gurgle*Southerndawg said:YellowSnow said:
I'm giving Boobs props for linking a good piece from a reputable, albeit center-left newspaper. They have good reporters and the op-ed page has a wide array of view points. This chart is pretty accurate in my view.salemcoog said:
I don't know what's more pathetic, Boobs turning in his black scarf or he actually paying to be a WaPost subscriber.YellowSnow said:Excellent piece Boobs from a quality, reputable, news source.
-
dnc said:CirrhosisDawg said:
*gurgle*Southerndawg said:YellowSnow said:
I'm giving Boobs props for linking a good piece from a reputable, albeit center-left newspaper. They have good reporters and the op-ed page has a wide array of view points. This chart is pretty accurate in my view.salemcoog said:
I don't know what's more pathetic, Boobs turning in his black scarf or he actually paying to be a WaPost subscriber.YellowSnow said:Excellent piece Boobs from a quality, reputable, news source.
RacistHermaphrodite as fuck -
Lets introduce Antifa to the 2nd amendment
-
Ts&Ps to southern white trash.dnc said:
Racist as fuckCirrhosisDawg said:
*gurgle*Southerndawg said:YellowSnow said:
I'm giving Boobs props for linking a good piece from a reputable, albeit center-left newspaper. They have good reporters and the op-ed page has a wide array of view points. This chart is pretty accurate in my view.salemcoog said:
I don't know what's more pathetic, Boobs turning in his black scarf or he actually paying to be a WaPost subscriber.YellowSnow said:Excellent piece Boobs from a quality, reputable, news source.
-
*Gurgle.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Moot point, right leaning news organizations are the minority. Mainstream media is controlled by left wing.2001400ex said:
Show me where Fox news said anything positive on Obama.oregonblitzkrieg said:
NYT and WP are nothing more than worthless hard left propaganda machines, like CNN and MSNBC. Nothing but one sided trash. Show me one positive article they have ever published about Trump.YellowSnow said:
Bull shit. It's center-left for NYT, WP, etc. WSJ, Economist, are center-right. There's a pretty god damned big difference between center-left and hard left. A new outlet can be left or right leaning and still be a reputable source of news. HTH.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Mainstream news is hard left. No gray area whatsoever. HTH.YellowSnow said:
I'm giving Boobs props for linking a good piece from a reputable, albeit center-left newspaper. They have good reporters and the op-ed page has a wide array of view points. This chart is pretty accurate in my view.salemcoog said:
I don't know what's more pathetic, Boobs turning in his black scarf or he actually paying to be a WaPost subscriber.YellowSnow said:Excellent piece Boobs from a quality, reputable, news source.
-
In this thread:
Troomps who think anything to the left of Breitbart is hard left. -
WSJ way too fucking low. Best paper in the country. HuffPo too high and center. Lulz at DailyKoz dropping out of lower left quad.YellowSnow said:
I'm giving Boobs props for linking a good piece from a reputable, albeit center-left newspaper. They have good reporters and the op-ed page has a wide array of view points. This chart is pretty accurate in my view.salemcoog said:
I don't know what's more pathetic, Boobs turning in his black scarf or he actually paying to be a WaPost subscriber.YellowSnow said:Excellent piece Boobs from a quality, reputable, news source.
NPR national's skew tends to be more of omission and theme than editorial. They report news pretty straight, and feature-type segments just ignore those culturally different. Local affiliates on the other hand are completely different. KUOW is full Mao, and from what I remember of the main Oregon stations, pretty much same.
