Oregon in at #17
Comments
-
There's still tim.haie said:
Yeah it's so doogish and shitty to try and match playoffs, 2 national championship appearances, a rose bowl win, a heisman, and multiple conference championships.oregonblitzkrieg said:Oregon thread coming up on 2K page views. Doogs aren't obsessed with Oregon at all. Deep down they still seethe with envy over the program that the Ducks became, and want to try to match that. That's why they cling to the coattails of the greatness that came before them. Don't worry, you'll get all the Oregon you can handle in the coming years. Ducks are on the march again bitches and loaded with money to buy all the best coaches in the nation.
We didn't lose to a shitty Arizona team twice while in this run, so we're not completely trying to copy Oregon.
-
Whew. I haven't figured out whether this is a pup recycler tour poast or if original.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Stop braying faggot. Don't you have something better to do, like catching sucker fish? Leave the release ruler at home, no one gives a shit if you eat them or toss them back. Just pull out the 3 inch long flesh ruler if you want to take measurements. No they won't compare to that record breaking 8 inch trout you caught 15 years ago. But at least they won't cock-size shame you too much. Fishdick.dflea said:
That's because Race is smart and you're a retarded motherfucker.oregonblitzkrieg said:Race makes a good poont about the voting. But still, getting voted to play in the game is different than getting voted the 'win.'
I'm leaning towards original, which puts obks commitment to non psilly poast pledge in doubt -
And by "history" you mean that one time in 2000 when UW won the conference and kind of sucked after that.Mosster47 said:
Your run is just starting sweetheart, or maybe it's over. History says it's over.haie said:
Yeah it's so doogish and shitty to try and match playoffs, 2 national championship appearances, a rose bowl win, a heisman, and multiple conference championships.oregonblitzkrieg said:Oregon thread coming up on 2K page views. Doogs aren't obsessed with Oregon at all. Deep down they still seethe with envy over the program that the Ducks became, and want to try to match that. That's why they cling to the coattails of the greatness that came before them. Don't worry, you'll get all the Oregon you can handle in the coming years. Ducks are on the march again bitches and loaded with money to buy all the best coaches in the nation.
We didn't lose to a shitty Arizona team twice while in this run, so we're not completely trying to copy Oregon.
Either way it will be chinteresting.
Because basically every other time UW has been at the top of the conference it's been a multiple year run.
You're probably just trolling but given your own history it's not out of the realm of possibility you're this stupid. -
If you think He's incorrigible now, just wait until after #mossterscats eek by the Fighting Gurgles next weekdnc said:
And by "history" you mean that one time in 2000 when UW won the conference and kind of sucked after that.Mosster47 said:
Your run is just starting sweetheart, or maybe it's over. History says it's over.haie said:
Yeah it's so doogish and shitty to try and match playoffs, 2 national championship appearances, a rose bowl win, a heisman, and multiple conference championships.oregonblitzkrieg said:Oregon thread coming up on 2K page views. Doogs aren't obsessed with Oregon at all. Deep down they still seethe with envy over the program that the Ducks became, and want to try to match that. That's why they cling to the coattails of the greatness that came before them. Don't worry, you'll get all the Oregon you can handle in the coming years. Ducks are on the march again bitches and loaded with money to buy all the best coaches in the nation.
We didn't lose to a shitty Arizona team twice while in this run, so we're not completely trying to copy Oregon.
Either way it will be chinteresting.
Because basically every other time UW has been at the top of the conference it's been a multiple year run.
You're probably just trolling but given your own history it's not out of the realm of possibility you're this stupid. -
Even if this is partially a whoosh it fills right in with the rest of your shtick.Mosster47 said:I think it's safe to say that Freeman, TBJ, and Benoit are all better than that Edwards kid who ran at will on your guys. No one in Rutger O-line rotation would be in the 10-man at Oregon and Herbert can make every throw in the book unlike that shit bird that Rutgers trots out there who can barely make two throws.
Your O-line couldn't keep Rutgers from beating the shit out of Brownsocks. Rutgers. Let that sink in. You couldn't run on Rutgers. Rutgers.
Stanford will have 350 yards on the ground against you.
This board is about to become amazing in November.
Wow southern Utah put up 21 in a half against oregon.
#1 who gives a flying fuck
#2 since you won't play an offense even close to as bad as them using your immaculate logic that means oregon will give up between 60 and 65 points a game.
Wow! Drawing conclusions based off of scrimmages is fun! -
It's funny you talk about the left lane thing as a Washingtonian. I used to be one. But I swear to Allah that I didn't set up my tent in that left lane when I lived there like most Washington drivers do here.Baseman said:Answer me this. Why does the most liberal—the "acceptance preaching party"— state in the union seem to produce the biggest assholes?
Is it the abundance of 1970's Volvos still on Oregon roads blocking the left lane? The continued shortage of women's razors (is there a fucking tariff, or what)? Could it be the specter of lingering Angel dust once mixed into your state's weed? Or is it Californication, when the Golden State's poor— tinsel town's failures—packed up their toilet paper screenplays, gave their BMW's back to the bank and moved north. -
Oregon-Washington arguments are so petty after you watch what Alabama did Saturday, in a "rebuilding year". The talent level between them and the tallest midget in the Pac 12 in any given year is so lopsided, does any of this really matter?
-
He's so fucking right, you know.ntxduck said:Oregon-Washington arguments are so petty after you watch what Alabama did Saturday, in a "rebuilding year". The talent level between them and the tallest midget in the Pac 12 in any given year is so lopsided, does any of this really matter?
The Pac-12 just went 11-0 and we all know the season is over for the whole damn conference. -
agreeMosster47 said:The Ducks have the offensive weaponry to score 50+ on everyone. They have the best O-line in the conference and physically the best back. You throw in a kid like Herbert and those little shifty fuckers everywhere at wide out and it's a really good offense. That said our backup QB is a walk-on who is shitty even by walk-on standards. If Herbert goes down TSIO.
The Ducks have the best kicker in the conference also. Being able to rake points every time you clear the 33 yard line is a massive plus.
Here's where things turn to shit; all three zero techniques are true freshman which means Stanford's running backs won't get touched until 3 yards. One of the starting ends are 245lbs. You can't play a 4i at the Pac-12 level with a 245lb guy. The Pagano kid from Clemson will fill that spot the second he is healthy.
One of the middle backers is a walk-on.
-
100%oregonblitzkrieg said:Oregon has the best defensive coordinator in the conference. The best o-line coach in the conference. The best that money can buy. We? just won't stop until we buy our way to the championship.
