Excellent piece by Spengler on the CSA Monuments
Comments
-
You were an alter boy, right?
-
A very good article. I keep wondering why now and have my own opinion but LarryinIowa's comment at the end of the article summed it up nicely:
"Some find it politically advantageous to reopen healed scars and divide Americans against each other. They thrive on hatred and strife. They call themselves Progressives".
Of course I love irony.
http://www.activistmom.com/blog/margaret-sanger-statue/ -
Why do you think these statues were even put up 50 years after the war?Sledog said:A very good article. I keep wondering why now and have my own opinion but LarryinIowa's comment at the end of the article summed it up nicely:
"Some find it politically advantageous to reopen healed scars and divide Americans against each other. They thrive on hatred and strife. They call themselves Progressives".
Of course I love irony.
http://www.activistmom.com/blog/margaret-sanger-statue/
Gotta remind them negros that they ain't shit.
https://www.newsy.com/stories/why-confederate-monuments-exist-in-the-first-place/ -
-
-
I have to agree with my long time sparring partner on this one. I found it odd this week that so many of them had been put up in the 20'sdhdawg said:
Why do you think these statues were even put up 50 years after the war?Sledog said:A very good article. I keep wondering why now and have my own opinion but LarryinIowa's comment at the end of the article summed it up nicely:
"Some find it politically advantageous to reopen healed scars and divide Americans against each other. They thrive on hatred and strife. They call themselves Progressives".
Of course I love irony.
http://www.activistmom.com/blog/margaret-sanger-statue/
Gotta remind them negros that they ain't shit.
https://www.newsy.com/stories/why-confederate-monuments-exist-in-the-first-place/
Slow and painful as it was, Blacks had made some progress by then and whites were nervous. And I am talking northern whites -
Oh come on now Rerun. Them scares were never healed. Sure people use it disingenuously for policital expediency, in the same way that Bannon is pulling your dick through Donnie.Sledog said:A very good article. I keep wondering why now and have my own opinion but LarryinIowa's comment at the end of the article summed it up nicely:
"Some find it politically advantageous to reopen healed scars and divide Americans against each other. They thrive on hatred and strife. They call themselves Progressives".
Of course I love irony.
http://www.activistmom.com/blog/margaret-sanger-statue/
But please. Race has always mattered. And not just the one on this bored. -
Stop Creepy you're scaresing me!creepycoug said:
Oh come on now Rerun. Them scares were never healed. Sure people use it disingenuously for policital expediency, in the same way that Bannon is pulling your dick through Donnie.Sledog said:A very good article. I keep wondering why now and have my own opinion but LarryinIowa's comment at the end of the article summed it up nicely:
"Some find it politically advantageous to reopen healed scars and divide Americans against each other. They thrive on hatred and strife. They call themselves Progressives".
Of course I love irony.
http://www.activistmom.com/blog/margaret-sanger-statue/
But please. Race has always mattered. And not just the one on this bored. -
Rent check is in the male.Sledog said:
Stop Creepy you're scaresing me!creepycoug said:
Oh come on now Rerun. Them scares were never healed. Sure people use it disingenuously for policital expediency, in the same way that Bannon is pulling your dick through Donnie.Sledog said:A very good article. I keep wondering why now and have my own opinion but LarryinIowa's comment at the end of the article summed it up nicely:
"Some find it politically advantageous to reopen healed scars and divide Americans against each other. They thrive on hatred and strife. They call themselves Progressives".
Of course I love irony.
http://www.activistmom.com/blog/margaret-sanger-statue/
But please. Race has always mattered. And not just the one on this bored.
With that said, it is apparent that my prior poasts focusing on your lack of a good grasp of Engrish hurt a little bit. Let me be the first to extend the olive branch and say I am truly sorry. I am entirely confident that you know, and knew, the difference between affect and effect. I should not have been so indulgent.
PS: wouldn't "scareing" have been more on the mark? -
PS: wouldn't "scareing" have been more on the mark?
